On 12 Jun 2014, at 10:38, Kim Jones wrote:
On 12 Jun 2014, at 8:54 am, LizR wrote:
But when I asked my computer if it could manage that, it said "I'm
afraid I can't do that, Liz."
Also it refuses to open the front door, so I'm stuck in the garage.
"Open the pod bay doors, HAL..HAL
> On 12 Jun 2014, at 8:54 am, LizR wrote:
>
> But when I asked my computer if it could manage that, it said "I'm afraid I
> can't do that, Liz."
>
> Also it refuses to open the front door, so I'm stuck in the garage.
"Open the pod bay doors, HAL..HAL - open the pod bay doors,
please.
On 12 June 2014 08:22, wrote:
> On Monday, June 9, 2014 10:32:02 PM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
>>
>> The TT has been so watered down that it doesn't prove anything except
>> that a glorified version of ELIZA can fool some of the people some of the
>> time.
>>
>
> If the TT has been watered down, then th
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:30:34 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:22:35 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, June 9, 2014 10:32:02 PM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
>>>
>>> The TT has been so watered down that it doesn't prove anything except
>>
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:22:35 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, June 9, 2014 10:32:02 PM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
>>
>> The TT has been so watered down that it doesn't prove anything except
>> that a glorified version of ELIZA can fool some of the people some of the
>> time.
On Monday, June 9, 2014 10:32:02 PM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
>
> The TT has been so watered down that it doesn't prove anything except that
> a glorified version of ELIZA can fool some of the people some of the time.
>
If the TT has been watered down, then the first question for me would be
"doesn'
On 10 Jun 2014, at 19:58, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/10/2014 2:04 AM, LizR wrote:
Having just re-re-read my good friend Wikipaedia's article on this,
I'm still not sure exactly what Turing is proposing. It looks like
what you said - that both a man and a computer tries to fool the
judge that th
Well, obviously it was based on Snow White! What's bizarre is actually
committing suicide at all, and especially in a manner based on a children's
animated film. But I suspect that it was an accident, and the apparent
coincidence was just that.
(What is it with gay people and Maleficent, anyway? I
On 6/10/2014 2:04 AM, LizR wrote:
Having just re-re-read my good friend Wikipaedia's article on this, I'm still not sure
exactly what Turing is proposing. It looks like what you said - that both a man and a
computer tries to fool the judge that they're a woman! Which is bizarre, but so are
cyan
Having just re-re-read my good friend Wikipaedia's article on this, I'm
still not sure exactly what Turing is proposing. It looks like what you
said - that both a man and a computer tries to fool the judge that they're
a woman! Which is bizarre, but so are cyanide coated apples if one can
believe t
Was that true in all the versions he published? I read the second version
of the test and wasn't sure if he meant the computer was trying to imitate
a woman, or just fool the judge that it was a person. It seems a bit
bizarre to have the judge trying to work out if it's a woman or a man or a
comput
On 10 June 2014 10:07, meekerdb wrote:
> On 6/9/2014 2:37 PM, LizR wrote:
>
> PPS those transcripts are hilarious, how could anyone be fooled? I mean
> maybe if you had no idea there was a possibility of it being a computer,
> just maybe but you'd definitely think you had someone autistic.
>
On 6/9/2014 2:37 PM, LizR wrote:
PPS those transcripts are hilarious, how could anyone be fooled? I mean maybe if you had
no idea there was a possibility of it being a computer, just maybe but you'd
definitely think you had someone autistic.
PPPS were the judges also computers? Just asking
PPS those transcripts are hilarious, how could anyone be fooled? I mean
maybe if you had no idea there was a possibility of it being a computer,
just maybe but you'd definitely think you had someone autistic.
PPPS were the judges also computers? Just asking. Some *people *couldn't
pass the Tur
The TT has been so watered down that it doesn't prove anything except that
a glorified version of ELIZA can fool some of the people some of the time.
PS Nice to see the illustration is from 2001 given the title of my thread
on this one :-D
On 10 June 2014 08:39, meekerdb wrote:
>
>
>
> ---
Original Message
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/09/eugene-person-human-computer-robot-chat-turing-test
This story has some actual transcripts. Suppose you had to decide
whether the judge was a "serious professional Turing contest judge" or
an "idiot" just bas
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
