multiverses and quantum computers

Hi Telmo Menezes Perhaps you're right, but to my limited knowledge, a quantum has infinite paths available between points A and B without invoking another universe. So no problem. - Receiving the following content - From: Telmo Menezes Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-01-31, 08:13

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Telmo Menezes Perhaps you're right, but to my limited knowledge, a quantum has infinite paths available between points A and B without invoking another universe. Once we are able to use (classical) information obtained in the other quantum p

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

Hi Bruno, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote: > > Hi Telmo Menezes > > Perhaps you're right, but to my limited knowledge, > a quantum has infinite paths available between > points A and B without invoking another universe. > >

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On 01 Feb 2013, at 09:46, Telmo Menezes wrote: Hi Bruno, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Telmo Menezes Perhaps you're right, but to my limited knowledge, a quantum has infinite paths available between points A and

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On 2/1/2013 12:46 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: Hi Bruno, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal > wrote: On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Telmo Menezes Perhaps you're right, but to my limited knowledge, a quantum has infinite pa

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 01 Feb 2013, at 09:46, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > Hi Bruno, > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> >> On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote: >> >> Hi Telmo Menezes >> >> Perhaps you're right, but to my li

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 8:39 AM, meekerdb wrote: > On 2/1/2013 12:46 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > Hi Bruno, > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> >> On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote: >> >> Hi Telmo Menezes >> >> Perhaps you're right, but to my limited kno

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On Saturday, February 2, 2013 2:39:53 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > On 2/1/2013 12:46 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > Hi Bruno, > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal > > wrote: > >> >> On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote: >> >> Hi Telmo Menezes >> >> Perhaps you're right

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On 2/2/2013 2:43 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 8:39 AM, meekerdb > wrote: On 2/1/2013 12:46 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: Hi Bruno, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> wrote: On 31 Jan 20

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

apparently both logical and evolution based "reason". And there is an abyss of complexity between those two kind of reasons. Bruno - Receiving the following content - From: Telmo Menezes Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-02-01, 03:46:32 Subject: Re: multiverses

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On 02 Feb 2013, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 01 Feb 2013, at 09:46, Telmo Menezes wrote: Hi Bruno, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Telmo Menezes P

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 02 Feb 2013, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> >> On 01 Feb 2013, at 09:46, Telmo Menezes wrote: >> >> Hi Bruno, >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal w

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On 04 Feb 2013, at 23:21, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 02 Feb 2013, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 01 Feb 2013, at 09:46, Telmo Menezes wrote: Hi Bruno, On Thu, Jan 31,

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

(including 'testable" one) between Plato, computer science and physics. Bruno - Receiving the following content - From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-02-04, 11:43:07 Subject: Re: multiverses and quantum computers On 01 Feb 2013, at 19:26, Roger Clough w

Re: multiverses and quantum computers

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 04 Feb 2013, at 23:21, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> >> On 02 Feb 2013, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>

Re: Re: multiverses and quantum computers

originally compounded for. - Receiving the following content - From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-02-01, 12:11:55 Subject: Re: multiverses and quantum computers On 01 Feb 2013, at 09:46, Telmo Menezes wrote: Hi Bruno, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bru

Re: Re: multiverses and quantum computers

nezes Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-02-01, 03:46:32 Subject: Re: multiverses and quantum computers Hi Bruno, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Telmo Menezes Perhaps you're right, but to my limited kno

Re: Re: multiverses and quantum computers

Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-02-04, 11:43:07 Subject: Re: multiverses and quantum computers On 01 Feb 2013, at 19:26, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Bruno, I can't see that superposition of states is any more magical in one universe than, say, multiple roots to an equation, or imaginary