On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Russell Standish
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 03:43:56PM +0200, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Russell Standish >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 05:33:00AM +0200, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
> wrote:
> > > > On S
On 25 Sep 2014, at 20:41, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 , Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Your clearly ignore the entire field of philosophy of mind.
You almost make that sound like a bad thing.
You might get help by reading some book, like Kim on supervenience, or
Tye's book on "8 probl
On 26 Sep 2014, at 10:14, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:17:07AM +0200, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Russell Standish >
wrote:
Well done for being obtuse! The platonically malleable urstuff is
usually taken to be integer arithmetic, a
On 26 Sep 2014, at 19:06, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
> Computationalism involves the notion of computation
Obviously, otherwise it would be a very misleading name.
Then don't equate computationalism and materialism. The second term
does not
On 27 Sep 2014, at 00:13, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/26/2014 11:05 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Sep 2014, at 09:18, Russell Standish wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:05:43PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/24/2014 6:53 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Telmo Menezes
mailto:
On 27 Sep 2014, at 08:40, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 06:49:33PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
We agree, but after the reversal "materialism" has not the same
meaning than before the reversal, and I agree with your use, as it
is coherent with comp, but it can be misleading
On 27 Sep 2014, at 15:43, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Russell Standish > wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 05:33:00AM +0200, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Russell Standish >
> wrote:
>
> So I don't see: robust universe =>
On 28 Sep 2014, at 01:39, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 03:43:56PM +0200, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Russell Standish >
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 05:33:00AM +0200, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:39 AM, R
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>
> It seems to me that the MGA makes the robust/non-robustness irrelevant.
What creates ambiguity is to not know where somebody, from you to everybody
on the list here, is talking from.
I know the system in place is to relate by referr
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:35:44PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 27 Sep 2014, at 15:43, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Russell Standish
> > wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 05:33:00AM +0200, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
> >wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 27,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:46:24PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> >Additionally, in a robust universe, the Church-Turing thesis tells us
> >that physics we supervene on must be emergent from the properties of
> >universal systems (Bruno's reversal result). Thus the matter we
> >supervene
> >on c
11 matches
Mail list logo
