On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> > > > It seems to me that the MGA makes the robust/non-robustness irrelevant. What creates ambiguity is to not know where somebody, from you to everybody on the list here, is talking from. I know the system in place is to relate by referring to the steps, but why not answer with an answer that is used in so many textbook/paper, that it must be robustly, consistently true forever? We can apply this kind of solution even to measure problem, to which, and I quote thousands of textbooks here, "the answer is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader." PGC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
