Hi guys,
mail_tool_uri_to_folder has started failing on uris that it used to
handle. Doing mail_tool_uri_to_folder
(file:///home/iain/evolution/local/Inbox, 0, ex); fails with the
exception No provider available for protocol `file'
Has this stuff changed recently?
iain
--
I think what we
Hi guys,
This is a patch I need to apply to shell and mail to allow the mailer to
be ready to handle the summary's requests for folder info.
Basically, the shell now sets the evolution directory in bonoboconf, and
on startup the mailer reads that directory instead of waiting for the
owner_set
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 01:22, Not Zed wrote:
Yeah i did something similar when purifying and quantifying on the
Solaris box - I thought 20% of total cpu for initialising 64 objects
was a bit much, I guess the timing/scheduling is different enough on
solaris to make the algorithm really not
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 11:30, Russell Steinthal wrote:
Glib2 has g_shell_quote, which seems to be exactly what I'm looking
for. Since I assume Evolution isn't going to depend on glib2 for at
least a few versions, is there any objection to my doing a cut-and-paste
port to, say,
Starting with Solaris 9, /dev/random and /dev/urandom will be
available. Many sites may also have installed ANDIrand on older
releases of Solaris. ANDIrand provides /dev/*random that is compatible
with the Linux implementation. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to try
out /dev/urandom on Solaris,
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 15:35, iain wrote:
In the current framework this is not possible -- but the patch moves us
even further away from the objective. :-)
Well, the shell could change the setting each time...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think there'd be a race condition here.
Jeff
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 19:38, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 14:44, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 15:35, iain wrote:
In the current framework this is not possible -- but the patch moves us
even further away from the objective. :-)
Well, the shell
Its been in bugzilla for over a year ...
It would be easy except for the way folder lists and searches work in
the gui, and as a result it isn't that easy and requires a few changes.
So yeah, the only way to do it at the moemnt is to manually create the
vfolder,which is pretty clumsy.
On Sat,
Currently, no. I wouldn't mind copying yam's interface for this which
would let you browse messages and delete them when you're done with
them, etc.
Although, the utility of such a feature for what you are doing is
questionable. Knowing your mail server was unavailable at 4am doesn't
really
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 07:08, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On Ne, 2002-04-21 at 21:48, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
My gues is that you were responding to a message that was not truly
iso-8859-1, but rather windows-cp1252 or whatever. Since not all chars
in windows-cp1252 can be encoded into
Has IMAP been enabled on the server?
I'm guessing here its an option, and it hasn't been turned on ...
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 12:39, muppet wrote:
the ximian pages touting evolution allude to its ability to connect to
lotus domino servers using imap. i R'd TFM and the faq and a few
I am puzzled... How can Evolution spread windoze virus? I am running
Mandrake 8.1 Linux with Evolution 1.0.3
Am I missing something?
TIA
-Mensagem encaminhada-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ohallot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NAV detected a virus in a document you authored.
Date: 20 Apr
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 08:23, Olivier Hallot wrote:
I am puzzled... How can Evolution spread windoze virus? I am running
Mandrake 8.1 Linux with Evolution 1.0.3
Evolution won't *automatically* spread viruses, but any mailer is
capable of transmitting a virus if you tell it to. Maybe you
It's easy to tell if IMAP is turned on, at the console type show
tasks. I'll go on the assumption that it _is_ turned on from here on
out...
If you are using IMAP SSL with Domino, well, sacrifice your best goat to
the gods because you have achieved a feat greater than the creation of
the world.
First off, I did already check the FAQ and read through the
possible fixes in the KnowledgeBase for Evolution for this
error. Nothing has worked yet (regarding libnspr and/or mozilla-nspr).
This is what I get every time I try and start Evo:
evolution-shell-WARNING **: Cannot access
I've finally gotten evolution (1.0.3) to the point I use it almost
exclusively as my mail client (IMAP from my Laptop to multiple IMAP
servers).
One thing I miss from MUTT is the ability to have arbitrary headers
display in the standard display.
I'd like to be able to see the SpamAssassin and
In the spirit of Havoc Pennington's recent How to write good UI's rant
[ http://www106.pair.com/rhp/free-software-ui.html ], I have to wonder
if this is even worth the trouble.
To me it seems that this will do nothing more than further complicate
the code for not much benefit (in fact, only
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 14:44, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
In the spirit of Havoc Pennington's recent How to write good UI's rant
[ http://www106.pair.com/rhp/free-software-ui.html ], I have to wonder
if this is even worth the trouble.
To me it seems that this will do nothing more than further
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 14:42, Larry Rosenman wrote:
The problem is I'd like to see the SpamAssassin and SpamBouncer scores
without having to wade through ALL the headers.
The number of headers in some of these mails are LARGE.
Why is it such an anathema to add this option?
Propose a
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 03:15, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:10:35PM +0930, Not Zed wrote:
Where did you read that such an environmental variable exists? It
doesn't.
That explains it. I saw this in a diff that was posted
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 15:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Should you have multiple custom views? Again, how would it work?
Good questions...
The hard part is the design. If you can adequately spec what you want,
the coding shouldn't be that tough.
Of course, patches are welcome. ;-)
Again, with
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 16:44, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
In the spirit of Havoc Pennington's recent How to write good UI's rant
[ http://www106.pair.com/rhp/free-software-ui.html ], I have to wonder
if this is even worth the trouble.
To me it seems that this will do nothing more than further
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 16:57, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 14:44, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
In the spirit of Havoc Pennington's recent How to write good UI's rant
[ http://www106.pair.com/rhp/free-software-ui.html ], I have to wonder
if this is even worth the trouble.
To
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:00, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 14:42, Larry Rosenman wrote:
The problem is I'd like to see the SpamAssassin and SpamBouncer scores
without having to wade through ALL the headers.
The number of headers in some of these mails are LARGE.
I'd like the ability to see other interesting headers without all the
fluff of the Received: headers, for one, and the List-* headers for
another.
Can we at least talk about it?
Or is this a firm NO WAY?
It's not a firm no way.
The patch from January would be against the old config
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 15:53, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 15:32, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Should you have multiple custom views? Again, how would it work?
Good questions...
The hard part is the design. If you can adequately spec what you want,
the coding shouldn't be that
This is where I say Evolution is not a console client and point out
that this is a hell of a lot more work than it is worth. Not to mention
it will severely increase the complexity of the display code, and it's
already nasty enough as it is without adding to it.
There has to be a line drawn
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:27, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
This is where I say Evolution is not a console client
I don't see how being a GUI app makes any difference. I have used VM by
clicking on it entirely, in an X windows session, as well as in an MS
Windows session.
and point out
that this
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:11, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I'd like to be able to see the SpamAssassin and SpamBouncer headers that
get added in the standard display.
Assuming that you want to see those headers so you can figure out
whether a message is spam or not, a simpler thing to do might be
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 19:44, Rob Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:27, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
This is where I say Evolution is not a console client
I don't see how being a GUI app makes any difference. I have used VM by
clicking on it entirely, in an X windows session, as well as
Does Evolution have a particular byte order for any of the binary files it
creates, or does it just use the native byte order of the system its running on?
Can I move my Evolution file heirarchy from a machine with one byte order to
another?
The reason I ask is that I have evolution
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 18:38, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 19:44, Rob Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:27, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
There has to be a line drawn somewhere where it makes sense to say no
and I believe this feature to be over the line.
Rats. What
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 18:24, Ian Goldberg wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 20:27, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
it will severely increase the complexity of the display code, and it's
already nasty enough as it is without adding to it.
The complexity of the display code? Sure, the *UI* part usually
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 20:44, Rob Walker wrote:
[snip]
it will severely increase the complexity of the display code, and it's
already nasty enough as it is without adding to it.
Oh, ok. That's too bad. I hoped that the display code had separate
areas for building the headers and then
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 07:09, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Resource temporarily unavalable means Resource temporarily
unavalable, ie the server cannot be looked up or connected to or
something.
Suggests to me that it has nothing to do with evolution.
Could it be related to the connect code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:38:53PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Mr. Winship said it wasn't a definite no way. Mr. Stedfast seems to say
definite no way.
Now, since there seems to be some disagreement within Ximian, we need a
call whether to
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 20:22, Rob Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 18:38, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 19:44, Rob Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:27, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
There has to be a line drawn somewhere where it makes sense to say no
and I
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 21:42, Zot O'Connor wrote:
So this is totally the opposite of what I was thinking... and makes the
display field trickier (something I was hoping to avoid).
What about a drop of all headers. There are plenty of times I want just
1 or two headers. If I could click on
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 09:57, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
This is where I say Evolution is not a console client and point out
that this is a hell of a lot more work than it is worth. Not to mention
it will severely increase the complexity of the display code, and it's
already nasty enough as it is
Anything's possible I guess, but I would think that this would be
happening to a lot more people (ie, more than 1) if it was a bug in the
connect code, right?
Then again, we thought that for other problems too...
Jeff
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 21:28, Not Zed wrote:
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 07:09,
As NotZed and I were just talking about on IRC, it seems to be a
gethostbyname_r error code. Not sure why it would be getting an error
there unless it is a libc bug (or the server really is down or
whatever).
what is the hostname of the server? What does the config.xmldb file have
as the
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 21:30, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:38:53PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Mr. Winship said it wasn't a definite no way. Mr. Stedfast seems to say
definite no way.
Now, since there seems to be
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 10:54, Ian Goldberg wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 20:27, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
it will severely increase the complexity of the display code, and it's
already nasty enough as it is without adding to it.
The complexity of the display code? Sure, the *UI* part usually
43 matches
Mail list logo
