On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 08:34, Fred Perloff wrote:
> I am running sendmail on my localhost. It dumps my mail in
> /var/spool/mail/$USER. Then I am running procmail to filter spam. Right
> now procmail is moving filtered mail to $HOME/mail where I read it with
> pine.
>
> I would like to use evoluti
Hi,
Anybody now how to sign messages using S/MIME
(smime.p7s, p7m, ...) ?
Whith Evolution 1.0.3,
menu options->mail_settings, edit a mail
account, in the "Security" tab, The Secure MIME frame is disadled
Is this option only available when using "Exchange
connector"? don't hope so!
Or n
Hi all,
Trying to track down whether this bug still exists in the 1.1.x
development tree:
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21604
Its still obviously in the 1.0.x tree, although happens rarely.
How many people out there are using 1.1.x? So far there seem to be no
reports from any 1.
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 01:41, Not Zed wrote:
> We know.
>
> And please dont double-post the same stuff.
Well, I didn't know you knew. It's frustrating to spend time to post a
problem, only to be ignored. Just a simple, polite "we are aware"
response would have been so nice.
Dan
>
> On Wed,
We know.
And please dont double-post the same stuff.
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 17:57, Dan Hensley wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 05:12, Not Zed wrote:
> >
> > Yeah.
>
> Care to elaborate?
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 20:29, Dan Hensley wrote:
> > > vFolders are acting up for me. I've noticed
There's at least one guy at Ximian who uses procmail to filter into a
maildir tree, and then uses evolution to read it at the same time. It
works reasonably well. I'm sorry I dont know how to setup procmail to
operate this way.
The original poster could try using the 'spool directory' option f
On 1 May 2002, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 04:30, Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
> > I'm just curious if anyone has managed to get an Evolution port done for Debian
> > Woody, on hppa architecture?
>
> evolution hasn't built for hppa, apparently due to gcc bugs on hppa.
> You can
I got this from [EMAIL PROTECTED] back in December 2001. Perhaps things
are different now.
Read the thread beginning with this message:
http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2001-December/015326.html
The subject of the thread is:
"Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync."
Already implemented in CVS for several months now :-)
Jeff
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 19:18, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On 1 May 2002, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
>
> > Nevermind, it is still "Edit as New" but it only works if the folder is
> > the *local* Sent folder, doesn't work for remote Sent fold
On 1 May 2002, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Nevermind, it is still "Edit as New" but it only works if the folder is
> the *local* Sent folder, doesn't work for remote Sent folders.
>
> I have just fixed this in CVS but it will still be broken in 1.0.4
Any chance of implementing a proper re-send or
Aha!! For awhile there, I thought I was going crazy. I'll be glad to
see this in the remote Sent folder.
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 17:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Nevermind, it is still "Edit as New" but it only works if the folder is
> the *local* Sent folder, doesn't work for remote Sent folder
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 16:38, Marc Williams wrote:
> Well, I might be missing something quite fundamental here, but none of
> the menu choices seem to be anything like what you are suggesting. A
> bunch of "reply" and "forward" options but I don't see anything that
> looks like what you are saying
Nevermind, it is still "Edit as New" but it only works if the folder is
the *local* Sent folder, doesn't work for remote Sent folders.
I have just fixed this in CVS but it will still be broken in 1.0.4
Jeff
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 18:17, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> It was renamed to "Open" for usab
Even so, how do I "Send" it once it's been "Open"ed? "Send" doesn't
appear to be an option.
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 17:17, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> It was renamed to "Open" for usability reasons or something.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 17:38, Marc Williams wrote:
> > Well, I might be
It was renamed to "Open" for usability reasons or something.
Jeff
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 17:38, Marc Williams wrote:
> Well, I might be missing something quite fundamental here, but none of
> the menu choices seem to be anything like what you are suggesting. A
> bunch of "reply" and "forward" op
Well, I might be missing something quite fundamental here, but none of
the menu choices seem to be anything like what you are suggesting. A
bunch of "reply" and "forward" options but I don't see anything that
looks like what you are saying.
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 16:08, Sean M Alderman wrote:
>
You can accomplish this by right clicking the message and selecting Edit
as New (or whatever it says). Then sending it. ...Granted it's a step
more than just clicking resend, but it will work.
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 16:36, Marc Williams wrote:
> Hmmm... I just went into my sent folder, right cl
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 15:07, Brian wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 15:56, Juan Martinez wrote:
> > I got this from [EMAIL PROTECTED] back in December 2001. Perhaps things
> > are different now.
>
> Ahhh ... so it was a potential locking difference between procmail and
> evolution. Fair enough.
Hmmm... I just went into my sent folder, right clicked on a message
expecting to be able to choose "Resend" on a particular message that I
wanted to resend but that choice wasn't there. I'm not saying it ever
was, but shouldn't it be? IIRC, I could do that with one of my previous
email apps. (
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 15:56, Juan Martinez wrote:
> I got this from [EMAIL PROTECTED] back in December 2001. Perhaps things
> are different now.
Ahhh ... so it was a potential locking difference between procmail and
evolution. Fair enough. Eh, flat files suck. Not Zed's recommendation
is righ
> On Wed, 1 May 2002 12:16:26 -0500,
> "SL" == "Stuart Luppescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SL> I sent skye a message about this off-list. Perhaps I should have replied
SL> to all.
SL> I use Evolution to read and write Japanese email all the time. It works
SL> very well. Here's all I do
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 13:41, Juan Martinez wrote:
> I use both pine and evolution depending on the situation. You should
> not have procmail filter your mail into mailboxes that evolution handles
> directly. Having procmail change the contents of those mailboxes will
> make for a bad situation w
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 04:30, Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
> I'm just curious if anyone has managed to get an Evolution port done for Debian
> Woody, on hppa architecture? The Debian package manager for this doesn't respond
> to e-mail enquiries about how far his multi-architecture port might be.
ev
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 13:41, Juan Martinez wrote:
> You should not have procmail filter your mail into mailboxes that
> evolution handles directly. Having procmail change the contents of
> those mailboxes will make for a bad situation with evolution.
How's that?
If he uses procmail to sort mai
S/MIME is not supported at all in 1.0.x, Connector or not.
Jeff
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 11:27, Alex Sandini wrote:
> Hi,
> Anybody now hot to sign messages using S/MIME (smime.p7s) ?
>
> Whith Evolution 1.0.3,
>
> menu options->mail_settings, edit a mail account, in the "Security"
> tab, The S
You'll need to edit evolution/po/fi.po in the source tree and send any
patches to the author of that file.
Jeff
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 04:08, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On 1 May 2002, Not Zed wrote:
>
> > We certainly want it to work very well in all languages and locales and
> > this has been
I use both pine and evolution depending on the situation. You should
not have procmail filter your mail into mailboxes that evolution handles
directly. Having procmail change the contents of those mailboxes will
make for a bad situation with evolution.
You can continue to use procmail and have
I sent skye a message about this off-list. Perhaps I should have replied
to all.
I use Evolution to read and write Japanese email all the time. It works
very well. Here's all I do to get it working:
LANG=ja_JP.ujis
LC_ALL=ja_JP.ujis
LINGUAS="ja_JP.ujis"
LESSCHARSET=japanese
export LANG LC_ALL LI
Hi,
Anybody now hot to sign messages using S/MIME
(smime.p7s) ?
Whith Evolution 1.0.3,
menu options->mail_settings, edit a mail
account, in the "Security" tab, The Secure MIME frame is disadled
Any hint?
Is this option only available when using "Exchange
connector"? don't hope so!
Reg
> I think the drafts folder can be set too, so could point to
> postponed-msgs as well, although I'm not sure if they treat drafts the
> same way.
speaking as one who uses both evolution (home) and pine (work) on my home
machine, I can say that they don't. the problem, however, is that pine
de
I am running sendmail on my localhost. It dumps my mail in
/var/spool/mail/$USER. Then I am running procmail to filter spam. Right
now procmail is moving filtered mail to $HOME/mail where I read it with
pine.
I would like to use evolution as my MUA. Can someone help me with the
syntax for the pro
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 05:12, Not Zed wrote:
>
> Yeah.
Care to elaborate?
>
> On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 20:29, Dan Hensley wrote:
> > vFolders are acting up for me. I've noticed this for the past little
> > while, but I'm not sure when it started.
> >
> > What happens is that I have several vFol
A while back an epoched gal package got into the snapshot channel. It
has been removed, but you'll need to remove the gal snapshot package
manually in order to get the newer packages (which do not have the epoch
problem).
-JP
--
--
=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1 May 2002 at 14:51, Not Zed wrote:
>
>
> I dont think we (i certainly dont) plan to spend any time on fixing
> development kernel related problems.
>
> There is some indication (from some bugs in bugzilla) that we are
> exposing kernel bugs.
I'm just curious if anyone has managed to get an Evolution port done for Debian
Woody, on hppa architecture? The Debian package manager for this doesn't respond
to e-mail enquiries about how far his multi-architecture port might be.
--
Martin-Éric Racine, Helsinki, Finland.
http://www.pp.fishpoo
On 1 May 2002, Erik Moeller wrote:
> I've written a pretty long review / discussion of Evolution. Please let
> me know if you find any factual errors.
>
> http://www.infoanarchy.org/story/2002/5/1/64850/34022
Small tidbit about Red Carpet:
There is one benefit in using it, in that proprietary
On 1 May 2002, Not Zed wrote:
> We certainly want it to work very well in all languages and locales and
> this has been a goal from the beggining.
The Finnish localization could use improvements. Which resource files do I look
for and where do I send the changes to?
--
Martin-Éric Racine, Hel
37 matches
Mail list logo
