Re: [Evolution-hackers] custom headers ?

2002-09-21 Thread Colin Walters
[ yes, I know, old mail; I'm just now catching up on this list ] On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 08:27, Tiberiu Ungureanu wrote: Is there any way you could define custom headers in the emails you send? Like X-Something: bla bla ? i searched all available menus, and then i searched through config

[Evolution-hackers] branching 1.2 off?

2002-09-21 Thread Colin Walters
Hello, Now that it seems 1.2 is nearing release, could we make it a separate CVS branch? I have a ton of outstanding patches I'd like to get integrated, and it would be nice to have CVS HEAD to play on without disrupting 1.2 Thanks. ___

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution feature change/alternative

2002-09-21 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Just use the Stop Processing action if that's what you want (that's what it is there for). It's also not going to change. Jeff On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 18:12, Corey Rogers wrote: Hi all. I hope this is the right list. Forgive me if it isn't. I'm try to propose a feature change in evolution in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution feature change/alternative

2002-09-21 Thread Corey Rogers
Thanks. Strangely enough when I went to do that I noticed I had done it for some filters. Must have been something I stumbled on and forgot about since I never really consciously saw it in action. Will have to pass this on. Thanks. On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 18:37, William Walsh wrote: On Sat,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] branching 1.2 off?

2002-09-21 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 01:08, Colin Walters wrote: Hello, Now that it seems 1.2 is nearing release, could we make it a separate CVS branch? I have a ton of outstanding patches I'd like to get integrated, and it would be nice to have CVS HEAD to play on without disrupting 1.2 I would think

Re: [Evolution] Free/Busy question

2002-09-21 Thread Lonnie Borntreger
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 18:16, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: Evolution, GAL, SOUP, gtkHTML: All latest CVS. I just setup my wife's Outlook 2k to publish her free/busy information to a web server. I then added that URL to her contact information in Evolution. When I go to create a meeting, and

Re: [Evolution] evolution 1.2 beta

2002-09-21 Thread Mårten Woxberg
fre 2002-09-20 klockan 15.20 skrev Not Zed: alphanumeric keys now jump to matches in the column you're currently sorting on. Which makes it pretty useless.. at least for me. I sort on Date and if evey date is Yesterday ##:## it doesnt mather how many times I press Y I could just press Down.

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Issues ...

2002-09-21 Thread Ryan P Skadberg
It's fixed in the latest snap!!! It took just over 2 minutes to load up all my folders. Thanks to everyone for their help! Skadz On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 12:13, Ryan P Skadberg wrote: I filed a bug as 30803. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help debug this. This is still

Re: [Evolution] evolution 1.2 beta

2002-09-21 Thread Dan Winship
fre 2002-09-20 klockan 15.20 skrev Not Zed: alphanumeric keys now jump to matches in the column you're currently sorting on. Which makes it pretty useless.. at least for me. I sort on Date and if evey date is Yesterday ##:## it doesnt mather how many times I press Y I could just press

[Evolution] Version confusion??

2002-09-21 Thread Steve
Okay, which version is 1.2? I went and hunted for it and I saw evolution-1.1.1-0.ximian.1.2.i386.rpm / evolution-devel-1.1.1-0.ximian.1.2.i386.rpm but the one I downloaded yesterday, evolution-1.1.1.99-snap.ximian.200209191730 is being reported as newer, by RPM. So do I have the ultra up to

Re: [Evolution] Version confusion??

2002-09-21 Thread Aaron
On Saturday, September 21, 2002, at 12:52 PM, Steve wrote: Okay, which version is 1.2? I went and hunted for it and I saw evolution-1.1.1-0.ximian.1.2.i386.rpm / evolution-devel-1.1.1-0.ximian.1.2.i386.rpm These two are Evolution 1.2 Beta 1, And the one below is a snapshot build from the

Re: [Evolution] Version confusion??

2002-09-21 Thread Tony Earnshaw
lør, 2002-09-21 kl. 18:52 skrev Steve: BTW I used to be a die hard XFmail user, an XFmail chauvenist at that. Recently, they announced a new version of XFmail; usually I'd download the binary or compile it without question, and upgrade. Now I just look at it, download it for archive

[Evolution] Few more problems with Beta1

2002-09-21 Thread Pascal DeMilly
With the latest snapshots (evolution-1.1.1.99-snap.ximian.200209210601) on Redhat 6.2, appointments received in my Inbox don't show anymore in the preview pane. Therefore I don't have a way to save them in my calendar, which is not a big deal right now as my calendar crashes every time I try to

Re: [Evolution] Beta1 lost some of my attachments

2002-09-21 Thread Pascal DeMilly
Jeffrey, NoZed I was running 1.1.1.99. I also verified directly on my IMAP server that the message in question was corrupted there as weel. But as I had moved in Evolution the message it is possible that I moved the corrupted message to my IMAP server. Regards Pascal On Fri, 2002-09-20 at

Re: [Evolution] Few more problems with Beta1

2002-09-21 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 23:40, Pascal DeMilly wrote: With the latest snapshots (evolution-1.1.1.99-snap.ximian.200209210601) on Redhat 6.2, appointments received in my Inbox don't show anymore in the preview pane. Therefore I don't have a way to save them in my calendar, which is not a big deal

Re: [Evolution] Few more problems with Beta1

2002-09-21 Thread Pascal DeMilly
Rodrigo, I did open a bugzilla few days ago but now I cannot find it. So here a newer backtrace with the error output from evolution-calendar embedded. Hope it would be useful to you. Regards Pascal On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 15:08, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 23:40, Pascal DeMilly

[Evolution] Script

2002-09-21 Thread Muralidhar Ganga
Hi, Running Evolution 1.1.1 on Redhat 7.2. Seems like no effect on using the script. Created a new script and used it as the default signature. For example like generating a fortune string /usr/games/fortune. Any ideas ? Thanks /Murali signature.asc Description: This is a digitally