[Evolution-hackers] Re: Composer failure ...

2003-01-06 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:48, Michael Meeks wrote: I'm still having repeated problems with Gconf / evolution, and it's interaction with Gconf 2.0. Essentially - after a time of quiescence I try to compose a message - and it fails to activate the composer. ... The reason for this is

Re: [Evolution] Re: [Evolution-hackers] SIGSEGV on setting label -gdb output and analysis

2003-01-06 Thread Mika Liljeberg
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 02:23, Not Zed wrote: Memory bugs are sometimes hard to find ... :-/ e_thread_destroy doesn't need to lock because if anything still has a handle to the ethread at the time it is destroyed, its already a bug. I figured as much, but the thread lock *is* acquired right

[Evolution-hackers] server.in-coherence

2003-01-06 Thread Dan Winship
In serveral places, we currently do: * foo.server.in.in: Contains @libexecdir@ and no translations * foo.server.in: Has $libexecdir substituted in and no translations * foo.server: Has $libexecdir substituted in and has translations But foo.server.in is in DISTFILES,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] server.in-coherence

2003-01-06 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 17:23, Dan Winship wrote: In serveral places, we currently do: * foo.server.in.in: Contains @libexecdir@ and no translations * foo.server.in: Has $libexecdir substituted in and no translations * foo.server: Has $libexecdir substituted in and has

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.2.1 on RH8.0...

2003-01-06 Thread Hans Scheffers
Hi I also couldn't compose messages, it would cause Evolution to hang If I logged into my machine as root, i was able to sent mail, so I have been looking in my own config to see what was the problem. After deleting the files with ~~ in the filename in the evolution folder / subfolders, I was

Re: [Evolution] The SMTP Problem...

2003-01-06 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 17:30, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: it seems that it does. I just added evolution users [EMAIL PROTECTED] to my contacts database and then did a Reply-All to the message and then trimmed out the To: address (Not Zed) and then copied the evolution users string that represented

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.2.1 on RH8.0...

2003-01-06 Thread Bill Richards
Title: Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.2.1 on RH8.0... Hi, thanks for the comment. When I try to start wombat, this is what I get: wombat-Message: Starting wombat wombat-pas-Message: Error registering the PAS factory: generic error wombat-Message: main(): could not initialize Wombat service PAS;

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.2.1 on RH8.0...

2003-01-06 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:19, Bill Richards wrote: Hi, thanks for the comment. When I try to start wombat, this is what I get: wombat-Message: Starting wombat wombat-pas-Message: Error registering the PAS factory: generic error wombat-Message: main(): could not initialize Wombat service PAS;

Re: [Evolution] The SMTP Problem...

2003-01-06 Thread Eric Lambart
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 09:16, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 17:30, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: it seems that it does. I just added evolution users [EMAIL PROTECTED] to my contacts database and then did a Reply-All to the message and then trimmed out the To: address (Not Zed) and

[Evolution] Inline GPG/PGP messages should be supported!

2003-01-06 Thread Steven P. Auerbach
I recently stated that GPG/PGP messages from myself were correctly decrypted in Evolution 1.2.1, but messages from others are not. A reply from vbi clarified the problem, pointing out that that stated that earlier versions had support for inline PGP, but that this has been dropped, because the

[Evolution] Wish: Two-Month Printout

2003-01-06 Thread Lane P. Lester
I am one of those low-tech persons who spends a considerable amount of time away from my computer(s) and who doesn't have a Palm Pilot. I solved this problem until recently with Lotus Organizer for Windows, which allows me to print my to-do list on one side of a sheet of paper and a two-month

Re: [Evolution] Inline GPG/PGP messages should be supported!

2003-01-06 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 19:49, Steven P. Auerbach wrote: I recently stated that GPG/PGP messages from myself were correctly decrypted in Evolution 1.2.1, but messages from others are not. A reply from vbi clarified the problem, pointing out that that stated that earlier versions had support for

Re: [Evolution] Inline GPG/PGP messages should be supported!

2003-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 14:26, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 19:49, Steven P. Auerbach wrote: I recently stated that GPG/PGP messages from myself were correctly decrypted in Evolution 1.2.1, but messages from others are not. A reply from vbi clarified the

Re: [Evolution] Inline GPG/PGP messages should be supported!

2003-01-06 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 20:42, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 14:26, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 19:49, Steven P. Auerbach wrote: I recently stated that GPG/PGP messages from myself were correctly decrypted in Evolution 1.2.1, but

Re: [Evolution] Inline GPG/PGP messages should be supported!

2003-01-06 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) gpg: Signature made Mon Jan 6 21:11:42 2003 CET using DSA key ID E5A7F7D6 gpg: using secondary key E5A7F7D6 instead of primary key 92082481 gpg: BAD signature from Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Damn. I'm sure that I've had no problems

Re: [Evolution] Inline GPG/PGP messages should be supported!

2003-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 15:11, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 20:42, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 14:26, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 19:49, Steven P. Auerbach wrote: I recently stated that GPG/PGP

Re: [Evolution] Inline GPG/PGP messages should be supported!

2003-01-06 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
Sorry, I'm tired. Forgot to include this: --- blah1 2003-01-06 21:42:21.0 +0100 +++ blah2 2003-01-06 21:42:36.0 +0100 @@ -41,7 +63,7 @@ inline, so dropping support for them makes Evolution basically unusable for reading GPG-encrypted messages. KMail

Re: [Evolution] Inline GPG/PGP messages should be supported!

2003-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Yea, I wasn't able to verify that message of yours either, but have discovered that this isn't an Evolution bug (for once!). I grabbed the raw message off my imap server and tried to verify it but it wouldn't verify. if I deleted the extra space before the '.', then it did verify. This seems to

Re: [Evolution] Bad Record MAC...still]

2003-01-06 Thread ximian-evolution
Well it's a little hard for me to go to the Moz team with a bug when I have no idea about what functions etc etc Evo is using from libnss. Is there anyone out (t)here that _IS_ successfully using SMTP+SSL? If so, what is your version numbers etc for all parts involved and how do you have things

[Evolution] Exporting to open office?

2003-01-06 Thread Carl Parrish
Is there any way to export my contact list into Open Office? -- Carl Parrish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.carlparrish.com --- Registered Linux User #295761 http://counter.li.org ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Evolution] Bad Record MAC...still]

2003-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
I use Evolution with SMTP+TLS. It works for Whenever Possible and Always. The server is QMail with the STARTTLS extension. Jeff On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 16:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well it's a little hard for me to go to the Moz team with a bug when I have no idea about what functions etc etc

[Evolution] Script-generated sigs

2003-01-06 Thread David McNab
To the folks who added the 'script-generated signatures' feature to Evolution - thank you! Totally kewl! :) You'll notice below that I'm taking full advantage of it. --- Cheers, David --- Today's Affirmation (selected automatically just for you): My body will function perfectly with any amount

Re: [Evolution] Script-generated sigs

2003-01-06 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 09:27, David McNab wrote: To the folks who added the 'script-generated signatures' feature to Evolution - thank you! Totally kewl! :) You'll notice below that I'm taking full advantage of it. --- Cheers, David --- Today's Affirmation (selected automatically just

Re: [Evolution] Script-generated sigs

2003-01-06 Thread David McNab
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 11:43, Stephen Kuhn wrote: I just realise this as well - after I upgraded to 1.2.1 I really didn't look around much - just was grateful that my mail was alive and kicking - and being that I already created a script to generate my personal sigs, this is even better for my

Re: [Evolution] Script-generated sigs

2003-01-06 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 10:15, David McNab wrote: Here's my Python script, which reads a file of quotes (one quote per line), and randomly selects one. Note that Evolution needs 'br' tags for line breaks. #!/usr/bin/python # change this to point to your file of quotes aff_file =

Re: [Evolution] (no subject)

2003-01-06 Thread Mark Gordon
There are Ximian aspell/pspell/gnome-spell packages for each of the platforms we support. Packages which are found on google, rpmfind, etc. may not work so well on your system. -Mark Gordon On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 23:14, Trey Sizemore wrote: Make sure that you have the gnome-spell package

Re: [Evolution] Script-generated sigs

2003-01-06 Thread Dwight Tovey
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 15:43, Stephen Kuhn wrote: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 09:27, David McNab wrote: To the folks who added the 'script-generated signatures' feature to Evolution - thank you! Totally kewl! :) You'll notice below that I'm taking full advantage of it. I just realise this

Re: [Evolution] Script-generated sigs

2003-01-06 Thread Dwight Tovey
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 16:15, David McNab wrote: Note that Evolution needs 'br' tags for line breaks. And as soon as I sent my message, David's messages showed up with the answer to my problem. I changed my sig generator to include the br tags and now I get what I want. Thanks David. Since

[Evolution] Signiture verification behaviour

2003-01-06 Thread Andrew Cowie
Small annoyance: When I verify a signature (by clicking on the little lock icon in a message) the GPG runs and verifies ok [at least for messages sent from people using evolution it does :(] but the when the message re-renders in the gtkhtml (?) window it is scrolled to the top of the message

[Evolution] evolution startup

2003-01-06 Thread Lennard Bakker
Is it possible make evolution always start in the summery screen? Lennard ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Script-generated sigs

2003-01-06 Thread simran
The sigs are taken as HTML (i believe)... the easiest solution is just to use the pre and /pre tags to put the text between. On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 10:38, Dwight Tovey wrote: On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 15:43, Stephen Kuhn wrote: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 09:27, David McNab wrote: To the folks who

Re: [Evolution] Signiture verification behaviour

2003-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 18:51, Andrew Cowie wrote: Small annoyance: When I verify a signature (by clicking on the little lock icon in a message) the GPG runs and verifies ok [at least for messages sent from people using evolution it does :(] but the when the message re-renders in the gtkhtml

Re: [Evolution] Script-generated sigs

2003-01-06 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 10:38, Dwight Tovey wrote: I noticed this when I upgraded to 1.2.1, but it doesn't seem to work as I expected. I have a script that puts out my sig as 5 lines. When I use it in in evolution directly, any formatting get stripped out and the sig is turned into one long

Re: [Evolution] evolution startup

2003-01-06 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 10:57, Lennard Bakker wrote: Is it possible make evolution always start in the summery screen? Lennard Not that this will help much, but I find that if I EXIT Evo on the Summary screen, it comes back up on the summary screen... -- Tue Jan 7 11:35:00 EST 2003

[Evolution] Evolution questions

2003-01-06 Thread David Frager
I have recently started using evolution. While monitoring my memory usage, I notice multiple instances of evolution-mail..Is this normal? dbfrager 16729 1 0 17:24 ? 00:01:53 evolution-mail --oaf-activate-ii dbfrager 16782 16729 0 17:24 ? 00:00:00 evolution-mail --oaf-activate-ii dbfrager

Re: [Evolution] Evolution questions

2003-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
yes, they aren't actually separate processes - they are just threads. Jeff On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 20:31, David Frager wrote: I have recently started using evolution. While monitoring my memory usage, I notice multiple instances of evolution-mail..Is this normal? dbfrager 16729 1 0

Re: [Evolution] kernel 2.5 and evolution

2003-01-06 Thread Chris Toshok
I must be missing something, but what on earth is this fix supposed to accomplish? It actually fixes something? I can see doing something like: if (getpeername (GIOP_CONNECTION_GET_FD(fd_cnx), (struct sockaddr *)fd_cnx-u.usock, n)) 0) fn_cnx-u.usock.sun_path[0] = '\0';

Re: [Evolution] kernel 2.5 and evolution

2003-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
If the problem is that the usock.sun_path char array isn't nul-terminated anymore (and it used to be), then the correct fix would be something more like: if (getpeername (GIOP_CONNECTION_GET_FD(fd_cnx), (struct sockaddr *)fd_cnx-u.usock, n)) 0) fn_cnx-u.usock.sun_path[0]

[Evolution] LDAP support

2003-01-06 Thread David Frager
I have attempted to configure my companies ldap server (Exchange 5.5), however, when I create an email and press the to button, evolution-addressbook crashes. Any ideas what I can check? -- David Frager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Evolution] evolution startup

2003-01-06 Thread guenther
cheers(); On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 10:57, Lennard Bakker wrote: Is it possible make evolution always start in the summery screen? Not that this will help much, but I find that if I EXIT Evo on the Summary screen, it comes back up on the summary screen... Lennard, your question let me play

[Evolution] Feature request - quote filtering (was: Script-generated sigs)

2003-01-06 Thread David McNab
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 12:30, Stephen Kuhn wrote: what I'm trying to do is change the initial quote strings such as in this email - at the top, where it says: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 10:15, David McNab wrote: ...THAT is what I want to change...(but I'm always mucking around with different

Re: [Evolution] Feature request - quote filtering (was:Script-generated sigs)

2003-01-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 23:22, David McNab wrote: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 12:30, Stephen Kuhn wrote: what I'm trying to do is change the initial quote strings such as in this email - at the top, where it says: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 10:15, David McNab wrote: ...THAT is what I want to

[Evolution] One Problem and One Suggestion

2003-01-06 Thread Patrick Nelson
My problem revolves around printing. Some of my messages don't print the content of the message. Seems to be messages that have html formatting, but I'm not sure on this. If I push print preview, the header section is there but the message will be blank. Do I have things configured wrong or am

Re: [Evolution] evolution startup

2003-01-06 Thread Lonnie Borntreger
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 21:35, guenther wrote: Lennard, your question let me play around something. And I got a solution -- it works -- although it is rather a dirty hack... The attached shell script should do it. Run it instead of evolution from path. Try this shell script: --

Re: [Evolution] kernel 2.5 and evolution

2003-01-06 Thread Mika Liljeberg
If I recall the earlier discussion, linux 2.4 did not correctly return the peername from an accepted unix socket but instead returned . This was apparently fixed in linux 2.5.x. Ronald's patch emulates the 2.4 behaviour. My guess (from a VERY cursory glance at the ORBIT code) is that globbering

Re: [Evolution] Problems installing 1.2.1...

2003-01-06 Thread Bill Richards
Title: Re: [Evolution] Problems installing 1.2.1... Thanks for the response, Bill. I'm not sure how to revert back to a clean situation. I did do some RH8.0 updates from the ximian RH8.0 channel. But I don't recall whether I did those before the evo install or not. It sounds like the RH8.0