[Evolution] Evolution's GPG Behavior

2003-01-02 Thread Bill Hartwell
- From: Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test Message Date: 02 Jan 2003 09:08:06 -0700 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Test Message - -- All private email sent with PGP encryption. Email for key. Homepage: http://www.macmanusnet.net/ Free

Re: [Evolution] Evolution's GPG Behavior

2003-01-02 Thread Bill Hartwell
x27;re asking. > > Jeff > > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:18, Bill Hartwell wrote: > > I thought about what JF had said, and did a quick test of my own. I sent > > a test message from another account, using Kmail, to this account, which > > uses Evolution. The results are be

[Evolution] Evolution SMTP Trouble

2003-01-03 Thread Bill Hartwell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm using Evolution 1.2.1 on RH8.0, and last night it began doing something extremely peculiar. For some reason, it's not sending the Rcpt command when trying to send mail. So I'm sitting here with a full outbox, and can't send any of it because wit

[Evolution] Evolution Password Error

2003-01-03 Thread Bill Hartwell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Something I've noticed with Evolution 1.2.1 is that it forgets passwords about half the time. Sometimes it remembers your password when fetching mail, and then on the very next mailrun, the "Please enter password" window will pop up - and it will NO

[Evolution] SMTP Error

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Unfortunately, it appears that the SSL connection is not the solution to the problem, either. I reset my connection to never use SSL, killed and restarted Evolution, and got the exact same error: Data response error: Need Rcpt command This, after r

[Evolution] Re: Evolution SMTP and Password Errors

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
Regarding Aaron's questions: The only firewall running on my system is the default firewall installed by Red Hat. The only changes I've made since installing Evolution 1.2.1 (to replace the 1.0.8 version that Red Hat installed with RH8.0) are the ones that came from running Up2Date immediately

Re: [Evolution] Problems installing 1.2.1...

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
need to form a minimal operating program. I am looking forward with great anticipation to a Ximian release that fixes the problems that RH8.0 caused. I'm certain that once it's possible to re-install the full desktop, a lot of the RH problems will be cleared up. -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Re: Evolution SMTP and Password Errors

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
having been a reply to a message on the Evolution list. Once I opened it and added a To: address, everything else worked like a charm. Note to self: Check Outbox more often... -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Built-in spam filtering?

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
st to get the headers for the filter, and then to get the message for your inbox. -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: OT: impersonate TE (was: Re: [Evolution] Evolution's GPGBehavior)

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
g GPG hasn't changed. Besides the habit part, it's also a political statement. The less any government can control, the better, and since GPG means they can't control a poster's privacy that's one more useful tool against the State. -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Evolution] The SMTP Problem...

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
? -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] The SMTP Problem...

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:10, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > what message was the reply to? maybe you can try reproducing the > problem? and/or maybe I can take a look to see if anything stands out > that may have caused the problem? > > Jeff > > On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:11

[Evolution] Re: [Users] The SMTP Problem...

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
> Kris > > On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:11, Bill Hartwell wrote: > > Now the question comes of...how did Evolution queue a message with no > > recipients? For that matter, how did it lose the recipients when it was > > nothing more than a reply to a message on the list, which

Re: [Evolution] Built-in spam filtering?

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
news...get all the headers, filter them, then do a delete/fetch on the bodies once the headers have been filtered. Is that what you have in mind? -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: OT: impersonate TE (was: Re: [Evolution] Evolution's GPGBehavior)

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Hartwell
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 15:38, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > lør, 2003-01-04 kl. 22:05 skrev Bill Hartwell: > > > Besides the habit part, it's also a political statement. The less any > > government can control, the better, and since GPG means they can't > > control

Re: [Evolution] Signature file

2003-01-09 Thread Bill Hartwell
cific user IDs in association with specific addresses, as someone else mentioned. -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Signature file

2003-01-09 Thread Bill Hartwell
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:08, guenther wrote: > cheers(); > > > I have my email configuration set to read my .signature file. > > Only, I keep getting the signature below. > > How do I set things up to actually read my ~/.signature file? > > Looks like the 'Autogenerated' signature... > > You can

Re: [Evolution] Signature file

2003-01-09 Thread Bill Hartwell
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 06:46, guenther wrote: > cheers(); > > > Thanks. This trick works very nicely. Too bad the folks who responded to > > my wishlist entry didn't mention it. Would have saved me a lot of > > cursing. > > > > My signature below is an example of the .signature file I use - the >

Re: [Evolution] Signature file

2003-01-09 Thread Bill Hartwell
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 14:27, guenther wrote: > You didn't get me. Try something like this, if your .signature is > executable. If not, put a leading 'cat ' in the second line. > > --- .signature-evo > #!/bin/sh > .signature | sed "s/$//g" > --- > > Then you can use the same .signature file and E

Re: [Evolution] Address book import

2003-01-11 Thread Bill Hartwell
d my voice to this chorus. I have far too many addresses in my KDE address book to even think of copying them by hand. I can export to csv, but that doesn't help if Evolution doesn't import csv. -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Evolution] Wishlist: Forwarding Message Source

2003-01-13 Thread Bill Hartwell
A feature that would be very nice is the ability to forward a message's unaltered source, including the full headers. Since the message source is what places like Spamcop use for determining where to send spam reports, what I have to do right now is switch to message source view, start a forward, d

Re: [Evolution] Wishlist: Forwarding Message Source

2003-01-13 Thread Bill Hartwell
I tried that, but when I looked at the attachment, it didn't appear to have the un-altered source. Maybe I was just looking at it wrong... On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 14:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > you want to use Forward As Attachment. > > Jeff > > On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 16:09,

Re: [Evolution] Wishlist: Forwarding Message Source

2003-01-13 Thread Bill Hartwell
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 14:46, Jason Tackaberry wrote: > On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 16:09, Bill Hartwell wrote: > > A feature that would be very nice is the ability to forward a message's > > unaltered source, including the full headers. Since the message source > > Forw

Re: [Evolution] Address book import

2003-01-14 Thread Bill Hartwell
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 23:08, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 20:52, Bill Hartwell wrote: > > I'll add my voice to this chorus. I have far too many addresses in my > > KDE address book to even think of copying them by hand. I can export to > > csv, but that

Re: [Evolution] Is virus protection required?

2003-01-14 Thread Bill Hartwell
than a handful that affect Linux, and most of those aren't really viruses, they're Trojans. I go through every so often and run RAV on my system, just to clear up the disk space that's wasted by them. They're not a danger to a Linux system, they're just annoying because

Re: [Evolution] Images again

2003-01-14 Thread Bill Hartwell
likely. The .png was a very nice image of a fallen maple leaf, proper. -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] Is virus protection required?

2003-01-15 Thread Bill Hartwell
I'm not sure what antivirus programs for Linux are. Maybe I'm not looking in the right places, but I haven't found any free ones yet. -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part