Re: [Evolution] GPG signatures

2002-01-25 Thread John Gateley
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 12:31, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Uh, I'm pretty sure you are wrong about what evolution is doing in this > case. Evolution *always* converts to CRLF before feeding it to pgp. How > did you go about tracking this down? > > Are you just comparing what is in the mbox? because t

Re: [Evolution] GPG signatures

2002-01-25 Thread John Gateley
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 19:19, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 17:53, John Gateley wrote: > > I have a GPG signature that works in mutt > > but not in Evolution, and it is NOT an > > inline signature: it comes in two MIME > > parts, one for the body an

[Evolution] GPG signatures

2002-01-24 Thread John Gateley
I have a GPG signature that works in mutt but not in Evolution, and it is NOT an inline signature: it comes in two MIME parts, one for the body and one for the signature, just like Evolution does. Are there any known bugs with Evolution that would cause this? I also got mail from CERT today, and

Re: [Evolution] POP SSL problem: "Operation now in progress"

2002-01-24 Thread John Gateley
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 14:01, sirkus wrote: > "Error while 'Fetching Mail': > Could not connect to pop.myhost.com (port 1925): Operation now in > progress." do a netstat and make sure there isn't an old connection on port 1925 closing down. Sometimes evolution seems to hang on closing (other threa