is neither Linux, UW IMAP, or
TCP, but is actually mozilla -- yet mozilla IMAP on Linux does not hang
when a modem is disconnected.
I don't suppose it's possible that the library is not being used
correctly...
Scott
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 09:13, Scott Otterson wrote:
Michael and Ted, thanks
don't
remember their names but I believe they referred local mailboxes. I
found that when I deleted these, my IMAP performance improved (mostly
switching between large folders.
Does this make sense?
mjc
--
Scott Otterson [EMAIL PROTECTED
, 2002-11-19 at 17:16, Scott Otterson wrote:
Why not? It's clear that there's a bug in evolution and that it's not a
fundamental flaw with Linux.
Now, if the stop button bug and the PPP-disconnect-hang bug are
manifestations of the same problem, then I agree that it doesn't make
explain your problem - uw.imapd is known to be
extremely inefficient. I would suggest you install a faster imap server
such as Courier imapd or (the even faster?) Cyrus imapd.
Jeff
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 20:23, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 10:29, Scott Otterson wrote:
OK, sounds
want
to figure out a good way to do the test before I start.
Scott
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 14:10, Not Zed wrote:
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 04:15, Scott Otterson wrote:
Jeff, those are great numbers but I suspect the test isn't measuring the
thing I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is amount
or something maybe?
Jeff
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 18:03, Scott Otterson wrote:
What a relief! Alright, I'll submit a bug on the hanging problem.
As for IMAP speed, I'm still not sure how to test 1.08 v.s. 1.20 on the
amount/number of times it spends downloading headers. I've got
that instead?
Scott
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 12:45, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 13:50, Scott Otterson wrote:
Yeah, I'd have to agree. IMAP is _much_ slower -- takes way longer to
start up for the first time and if you disconnect, it's way slower to
reconnect.
The connection
Um, Jeff, you missed the point: the mozilla IMAP connection does not
hang when PPP is lost.
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 10:12, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:01, Scott Otterson wrote:
Well, first, although the IMAP on 1.2 is supposed to be faster than
1.08, several of us have
Hmmm...
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 10:25, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
I don't particularly care.
Jeff
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:22, Scott Otterson wrote:
Um, Jeff, you missed the point: the mozilla IMAP connection does not
hang when PPP is lost.
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 10:12, Jeffrey
OK, sure. I'll be glad to repeat any PPP IMAP speed tests you've done.
What were they?
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 10:31, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:25, Scott Otterson wrote:
Oh, and also, what about the IMAP connections being -- not faster -- but
slower?
I don't know
Yes, Ettore, you're right about the stop button not working -- and
there's at least one bug on it but it was closed as fixed even though it
wasn't.
Is the stop button problem also causing the PPP-disconnect-induced
hangs? Or should I file a separate bug? Anyway, you're right that this
isn't a
Evolution 1.0.x and 1.2.0 with regards
to loading an imap folder. Afterall, that is what you said was slower,
correct?
however, I suspect the problem is not evolution at all. probably your
server is just slower to respond or something.
Jeff
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 15:43, Scott Otterson wrote
stop button
bug and if it is known that these are really the same problem.
Are both these things true?
Scott
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:33, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
please do not submit new bug reports, thanks.
Jeff
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 16:15, Scott Otterson wrote:
Yes, Ettore, you're
wrote:
they are 1) unrelated and 2) already reported.
Jeff
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 17:16, Scott Otterson wrote:
Why not? It's clear that there's a bug in evolution and that it's not a
fundamental flaw with Linux.
Now, if the stop button bug and the PPP-disconnect-hang bug
Yeah, I'd have to agree. IMAP is _much_ slower -- takes way longer to
start up for the first time and if you disconnect, it's way slower to
reconnect.
The connection also hangs if my PPP dialup goes down -- I have to run
killev before it can see email again. This is the only network app I
have
On my Redhat 8.0 system, I had a working version of evo 1.08 connected
to my IMAP account. But after upgrading to 1.20, I can't read mail from
any of my folders.
After starting evo, there's nothing in the mail header window and I get
the error message popup:
Error while 'Opending folder
and
mailer.
Am I understanding this correctly? Any chance that a true IMAP trash
folder could be implemented sooner than 1.2 or 1.4?
Thanks,
Scott
Jeff
On Sat, 2001-11-24 at 07:34, Scott Otterson wrote:
I'd like to automatically store deleted messages in an IMAP trash folder
(like
17 matches
Mail list logo
