On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:21:37AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > RFC1894
> > is for MTAs. The UA generates only the request. The MTA generates the
> > response. Dr. QMail dismisses rfc1894 as entirely obsolete. DJBernstien
> > has his own method but, AFAIK, he didn't write an RFC, so cha
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 15:22, PeterKorman wrote:
> There are 2 RFCs.
> []
> RFC1894
> is for MTAs. The UA generates only the request. The MTA generates the
> response. Dr. QMail dismisses rfc1894 as entirely obsolete. DJBernstien
> has his own method but, AFAIK, he didn't write an RFC, so cha
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:48:37AM +1030, Not Zed wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 07:11, Russell Stuart wrote:
> > - Read receipts (aka Disposition Notifications). Obviously you guys
> > don't consider them important, this being the second major release
> > and they are still not there. I do -
Aristotle wrote:
-
I agree with you although now I believe you are behaving like a Linux
Bigot. Of course MS Draw is rubbish - do you think commercial
developers would appreciate MS encroaching on their turf? The
developers for commercial graphics software (the big name ones)
I agree with you although now I believe you are behaving like a Linux
Bigot. Of course MS Draw is rubbish - do you think commercial
developers would appreciate MS encroaching on their turf? The
developers for commercial graphics software (the big name ones) are
probably in bed with M$ anyway.
On
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 13:04, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 November 2002 10:51 pm, Russell Stuart wrote:
> > Evolution 1.2 is very, very good. IMHO
> > it is the first piece of open source office software that is on a par
> > with Microsoft's equivalent offering - better in some ways, i
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 10:51 pm, Russell Stuart wrote:
> Evolution 1.2 is very, very good. IMHO
> it is the first piece of open source office software that is on a par
> with Microsoft's equivalent offering - better in some ways, in fact.
> An extraordinary achievement, considering the resou
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 21:06, simran wrote:
> You can turn the signatures off from:
>
> Tools
> => Settings
> => Mail Accounts
> => Select the mail Account
> => Edit
> => Identity
> => Default Signature
> => None
>
>
>
You can turn the signatures off from:
Tools
=> Settings
=> Mail Accounts
=> Select the mail Account
=> Edit
=> Identity
=> Default Signature
=> None
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 13:29, David Bell wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-19 a
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 18:29, David Bell wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 08:21, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> > I would add to that a way to toggle the display of html or text
> > versions of mail, ala kmail. It sure speeds up the deletion of spam,
> > not having to wait for it to display its stupid
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 08:21, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> I would add to that a way to toggle the display of html or text
> versions of mail, ala kmail. It sure speeds up the deletion of spam,
> not having to wait for it to display its stupid HTML before I delete
> it. Plus, a lot of my incomin
> > - Read receipts (aka Disposition Notifications). Obviously you guys
> > don't consider them important, this being the second major release
> > and they are still not there. I do - enough to spend a pleasant
> > hour or so going through the source finding a way to turn them on
> > perm
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 11:18, Not Zed wrote:
> Dont even know what this is. But that doesn't sound like a showstopper.
No. None of these things are. Evolution 1.2 is very, very good. IMHO
it is the first piece of open source office software that is on a par
with Microsoft's equivalent offeri
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 07:11, Russell Stuart wrote:
> Last week I made the move from Outlook to Evolution 1.2. I thought I
> would give some feed back on things I am having difficulty adjusting
> to.
>
> - There is no way I have found to do the equivalent of "Shift-Delete"
> in Outlook. Shift-De
On Monday 18 November 2002 06:50 pm, Etienne Tourigny wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 17:58, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> > On Monday 18 November 2002 03:41 pm, Russell Stuart wrote:
> > > Last week I made the move from Outlook to Evolution 1.2. I
> > thought I > would give some feed back on things I
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 17:58, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> On Monday 18 November 2002 03:41 pm, Russell Stuart wrote:
> > Last week I made the move from Outlook to Evolution 1.2. I thought I
> > would give some feed back on things I am having difficulty adjusting
> > to.
>
> And then Russell goes on
On Monday 18 November 2002 03:41 pm, Russell Stuart wrote:
> Last week I made the move from Outlook to Evolution 1.2. I thought I
> would give some feed back on things I am having difficulty adjusting
> to.
And then Russell goes on to point out some differences in the details
between Outlook and
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 12:41, Russell Stuart wrote:
> - Shift-Ctrl-M is modal in Evolution, in Outlook it isn't. This
> means that in Outlook I can press Shift-Ctrl-M regardless of
> where I am. In Evolution it won't work if I am in a mail folder
> (such as the Inbox), or if I am in the com
Last week I made the move from Outlook to Evolution 1.2. I thought I
would give some feed back on things I am having difficulty adjusting
to.
- There is no way I have found to do the equivalent of "Shift-Delete"
in Outlook. Shift-Delete deletes a message permanently, without
moving it the Tra
19 matches
Mail list logo
