Re: [Evolution] GPG and Evolution

2003-01-03 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
Oh ... :) And lastly, why does Evolution still call it PGP? *grin* because gpg implements the Pretty Good Privacy specification. the name wasn't chosen by which executable it runs, but rather the specification it implements. PGP was a product, is a product, will always be a

[Evolution] GPG and Evolution

2003-01-02 Thread Jason Frisvold
. However, PGP doesn't seem to be able to recognize the GPG signature. I understand this is a GPG issue. There is an Evolution part to this, though. Evolution calls GPG internally (from what I can tell)... Is there a way to call GPG from Evolution with certain parameters? Does

Re: [Evolution] GPG and Evolution

2003-01-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
with a windows machine and PGP be able to verify the signature. However, PGP doesn't seem to be able to recognize the GPG signature. how so? I understand this is a GPG issue. There is an Evolution part to this, though. Evolution calls GPG internally (from what I can tell)... Is there a way

Re: [Evolution] GPG and Evolution

2003-01-02 Thread Jason Frisvold
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:03, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:26, Jason Frisvold wrote: Greetings, I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a great product. I have a problem I would like to solve, though. I use GPG to sign my emails. I'd

Re: [Evolution] GPG and Evolution

2003-01-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:16, Jason Frisvold wrote: On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:03, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:26, Jason Frisvold wrote: Greetings, I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a great product. I have a problem I would like