Re: [Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-10 Thread Chris Tooley
Ahh, so it is an "implimentation" issue. Not necessarily a broken implimentation. I should mention that I never really blamed Ximian, Ximian is just much more likely to fix a problem than Lotus. Can't wait to see Evolution on the shelves at the local computer store. Chris Tooley On Sat, 2001-

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-10 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
We tried to get all the messages in 1 lump sum (the most efficient way of doing it since it saves quite a bit of network traffic) - you'll notice that we asked for 1:* which means "give us all the messages starting with 1 all the way to the last message that you've got" and it didn't, so we rightf

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-10 Thread Chris Tooley
I somewhat believe that it isn't Evo's fault. I noticed the 0 Recent message, but that doesn't explain why one message will screw up the entire downloading of the mail box. I don't know enough about IMAP to know whether it's a spec problem or an implimentation problem but on message marked as S

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-10 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Here's your problem: sending : A00092 SELECT {5+} INBOX received: * 12101 EXISTS received: * 0 RECENT received: * OK [UNSEEN 1] Message 1 is first unseen received: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1] UIDs valid received: * FLAGS (\Flagged \Seen \Answered \Deleted \Draft) received: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Flagged

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-09 Thread Chris Tooley
This is the output. I note that there is about 12000 messages but it says that 0 are recent? They should all be recent. Chris On Fri, 2001-11-09 at 17:28, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Can you export CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 and then run evolution-mail in that > terminal then wait 5 seconds and start

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Can you export CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 and then run evolution-mail in that terminal then wait 5 seconds and start evolution in a second terminal and send is the log? Jeff On Fri, 2001-11-09 at 18:09, Chris Tooley wrote: > Well, it's a Domino based mail file. There were as I said 15000 > messages

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-09 Thread Chris Tooley
I have reverted back to POP3 for the time being, so this isn't a huge rush. Chris Tooley On Fri, 2001-11-09 at 16:55, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > There's no problems with large IMAP folders that I know of... I've got > some pretty hefty sized imap folders and it works perfectly fine for me. > > A

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-09 Thread Chris Tooley
Well, it's a Domino based mail file. There were as I said 15000 messages in the "INBOX" which were truly in the inbox. When I went to download them, it got somewhere around August 2000 (I started here in July) and stopped. I deleted all 3000 of those messages and moved on. However it still won

Re: [Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
There's no problems with large IMAP folders that I know of... I've got some pretty hefty sized imap folders and it works perfectly fine for me. Are you by any chance using Evolution to filter your IMAP Inbox folder? if so, then it might say "500 new messages" and then when you switch to it, it wi

[Evolution] IMAP Large Folders Problems

2001-11-09 Thread Chris Tooley
I know there was some talk about problems with large folders in IMAP connections. Is there a way to clear out what Evolution thinks is in the Folder and force it to check again? I had 15592 messages in my INBOX and it only downloaded headers for 3523 of them. I deleted all 3823 and now it says