On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 22:42, Eric Lambart wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 12:51, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
That's my understanding, too. Am I the only one who finds that
Evolution has amnesia when it comes to threading preferences (but
remembers sorting, column, and some other preferences)?
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 12:36, Enver ALTIN wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 00:14, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
I've noticed this thread break comes from Outlook and AOL users, and
Lyris list server software also refuses to thread. I really like
threading, so I pay attention to what screws it up.
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 06:36, Enver ALTIN wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 00:14, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
I've noticed this thread break comes from Outlook and AOL users, and
Lyris list server software also refuses to thread. I really like
threading, so I pay attention to what screws it up.
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 12:51, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
That's my understanding, too. Am I the only one who finds that
Evolution has amnesia when it comes to threading preferences (but
remembers sorting, column, and some other preferences)?
For the record, I am using RH 7.2/kernel
cheers();
I noticed that on mailing lists, threads are often broken. In some
cases, it's just because evo does apparently not thread by Subject
(which, if it did, I'd want to be able to switch off in any case),
Evo 1.0.x was threading by subject, Evo 1.2.x determines from other
header
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 14:42, Not Zed wrote:
In-Reply-To: Message from Bob Apthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] of Mon, 13 Jan
2003 15:36:24 CST. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've asked the author of the offending message what mailer he used, I'll
report back when I get an answer.
Its not that easy, we
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 18:10, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
Yo!
I noticed that on mailing lists, threads are often broken. In some
cases, it's just because evo does apparently not thread by Subject
(which, if it did, I'd want to be able to switch off in any case), but
in other
cheers();
guenther: Thanks for the tip, but I don't think I'd want threading by
Subject back, except perhaps as a form of semi-manual thread management.
neither do I...
--- WISHLIST ITEM ---
2 new commands:
- break thread (look at this thread, for instance) at current msg
- thread this
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:40, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 14:42, Not Zed wrote:
In-Reply-To: Message from Bob Apthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] of Mon, 13
Jan 2003 15:36:24 CST.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've asked the author of the offending message what
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 02:54, Alessio Bragadini wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:40, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
I noticed that on mailing lists, threads are often broken. In some
cases, it's just because evo does apparently not thread by Subject
1.2.X doesn't, 1.0.X did.
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 00:14, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
I've noticed this thread break comes from Outlook and AOL users, and
Lyris list server software also refuses to thread. I really like
threading, so I pay attention to what screws it up. Surprisingly, yahoo
hosted lists seem to thread very
Yo!
I noticed that on mailing lists, threads are often broken. In some
cases, it's just because evo does apparently not thread by Subject
(which, if it did, I'd want to be able to switch off in any case), but
in other cases it's unusual headers. Some (Thread-Id, Thread-Topic) seem
really weird,
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:40, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
I noticed that on mailing lists, threads are often broken. In some
cases, it's just because evo does apparently not thread by Subject
1.2.X doesn't, 1.0.X did.
in other cases it's unusual headers. Some (Thread-Id,
hi guys,
i have a question:
i like threaded message view but i'm missing one thing
i would like to see threads sorted according to the date of the LAST
message in the thread .. so the active threads will be always on the top
of the list
i think that in this manner, it would be much easier to
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 16:01, Dan Winship wrote:
This is broken. We really should change Evolution's behavior. It is much
more annoying to have false-positive threading than false-negative
threading.
Yes, definitely. I thought we had a bug but I couldn't find it so I
filed a new one:
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 23:01, Dan Winship wrote:
This is broken. We really should change Evolution's behavior. It is much
more annoying to have false-positive threading than false-negative
threading.
I agree. Also because false-positive threading can put a message very
far in a crowded
That is what it's doing, it's threading them under the most recent
message with the same subject - you just haven't thought about the logic
you requested ;-)
Jeff
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 20:01, Eric Newman wrote:
When threading by subject (because the In-Reply-To header is not
present), could
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 11:55, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
That is what it's doing, it's threading them under the most recent
message with the same subject - you just haven't thought about the logic
you requested ;-)
But I really did. I get one message with subject foo. A month later I
get another
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 12:10, Eric Newman wrote:
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 11:55, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
That is what it's doing, it's threading them under the most recent
message with the same subject - you just haven't thought about the logic
you requested ;-)
But I really did. I get one
I'm not sure how this has turned into such a long thread.
Example: I send you a message with the subject Hello. Bob also sends
you a message with the subject Hello. You reply to the message from
me, and then delete the original. Then I reply to you, and my message
with the subject Re: Hello gets
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 13:01, Dan Winship wrote:
I'm not sure how this has turned into such a long thread.
Example: I send you a message with the subject Hello. Bob also sends
you a message with the subject Hello. You reply to the message from
me, and then delete the original. Then I reply
When threading by subject (because the In-Reply-To header is not
present), could you put the new messages to be threaded under the most
recent message with a matching subject? I keep getting emails with
identical subjects to mails that I got a month ago, and when people
reply to them, Evo threads
Hi,
I am a happy evolution 1.0 user (Debian woody) but I have a little
problem.
I use the threaded view of my mailboxes but there are not all the
keyboard short cuts I expect.
There are no short cuts to open or collapse all threads. In mozilla * to
open all and / to collapse all, IIRC.
I have
On Wed, 2001-12-26 at 20:16, René Seindal wrote:
I have found that Ctrl-minus collapses a thread, but to open one I have
to use Ctrl-Shift-= as = is shifted on my Danish keyboard. That is a
bit awkward. In mozilla this is Ctrl-minus and Ctrl-plus which are much
easier to find.
You can use
On Wed, 2001-12-26 at 20:43, Janus Christensen wrote:
On Wed, 2001-12-26 at 20:16, René Seindal wrote:
I have found that Ctrl-minus collapses a thread, but to open one I have
to use Ctrl-Shift-= as = is shifted on my Danish keyboard. That is a
bit awkward. In mozilla this is Ctrl-minus
On Wed, 2001-12-26 at 21:33, René Seindal wrote:
You can use the use the left and right arrow keys to collapse and
expand a thread respectively. Or at least I can... ,-)
Works for me too. I'd never guessed that.
.-)
I find that way much easier than any combination of Ctrl and
Is there a way in Evolution to not do threading based on the Subject
header? I found this really annoying where it consider a new message as
part of an old thread just because it has the same subject header.
Regards,
--
Victor Hadianto
---
If it's working, the diagnostics say it's
27 matches
Mail list logo
