So, if I want the latest and greatest (including 1.0+), do I stick with
the HEAD? IOW, will 1.0 changes be brought back into HEAD eventually,
and will the new features occur in HEAD, or have the 1.0+ streams
already been branched and HEAD is dead?
You should never assume that the
On Sat, 2001-12-01 at 06:25, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 19:48, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
Here's a bunch of (probably) stupid questions.
Any particular reason it was branched? Just curious since I though the
normal way was to remain in one branch until 1.0 then branch new
Here's a bunch of (probably) stupid questions.
Any particular reason it was branched? Just curious since I though the
normal way was to remain in one branch until 1.0 then branch new
development.
So, to continue my ways of having the latest stuff from CVS, should I
change the GAL and Evolution
1.0 is on the gtkhtml-1-0-branch
--Larry
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 22:37, Dan Hensley wrote:
A few days ago I updated the Evolution 1 branch from CVS, and it's
looking for gtkhtml 1.0. However, gtkhtml hasn't updated for a few
days, and it's still at 0.16.1. Is it just that anoncvs hasn't
A few days ago I updated the Evolution 1 branch from CVS, and it's
looking for gtkhtml 1.0. However, gtkhtml hasn't updated for a few
days, and it's still at 0.16.1. Is it just that anoncvs hasn't caught
up yet, or is there some disconnect?
Dan
