There has been quite a bit of conversation about the way that standard replies on this list, unlike others, sends the reply to only the original author of the message. Sometimes I =want= to reply to just the author and not to the list. My practice with other email clients has been to do a
There has been quite a bit of conversation about the way that standard replies on this list, unlike others, sends the reply to only the original author of the message. Sometimes I =want= to reply to just the author and not to the list. My practice with other email clients has been to do a
cheers();
There has been quite a bit of conversation about the way that standard
replies on this list, unlike others, sends the reply to only the
original author of the message. Sometimes I =want= to reply to just
the author and not to the list. My practice with other email clients
has been
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 12:32, Eric Lambart wrote:
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 17:07, willou wrote:
Hello,
Yes, for the moment, i aswer to the main message and i copy/paste the
message in attachement into another new message which is destinated to
the sender of the mail in attachement.
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 13:54, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
snip
- evolution, unlike primitive MUAs like mutt and kmail does not bind
any key to the reply to list action, nor is there a toolbar button.,
so to reply properly, you have to dig into the menus.
See
Hello,
Is it possible to answer to an email which is sent as an attachement ?
Bye thanks a lot for Evolution or my prefered Email client ! :)
--
willou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You might be able to accomplish this by doing Action-Forward-Inline
(or Ctrl-Shift-J), and then deleting everything but the attached part.
That won't quote your message though, with the at the beginning
of each line. So you might prefer to highlight and Edit-Copy (or
Ctrl-C) the text of the
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 17:07, willou wrote:
Hello,
Yes, for the moment, i aswer to the main message and i copy/paste the
message in attachement into another new message which is destinated to
the sender of the mail in attachement.
With outlook, because the person who work with me use
I would like the reply-to field to populate to the list email
address...is this possible?
--
Ray Hunter
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www:http://venticon.com
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 14:36, Ray Hunter wrote:
I would like the reply-to field to populate to the list email
address...is this possible?
So would I, but we seem to be in the minority.
My annoyances, as is, are:
- just hitting reply does not send to list as usually intended.
- reply to all
Is there a way to run a script that would populate the reply-to with the
list name?
I know that you can run shell commands in the filters, could a script be
set in there that would somehow change the reply-to in the email to the
list name?
I am not that familiar with the under workings of
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 20:36, Ray Hunter wrote:
I would like the reply-to field to populate to the list email
address...is this possible?
I strongly second this proposal (using lists quite heavy). Even better,
if there would be support for proper Mail-Followup-To: header (or at
least for setting
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:27, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 14:36, Ray Hunter wrote:
I would like the reply-to field to populate to the list email
address...is this possible?
So would I, but we seem to be in the minority.
I don't think it should do this by default. You
I like the reply-to-list feature...that is cool...however, if i am
replying to a list i would like that list email there so that i do not
get tons of double sends...to me and then list...
I would like the ability to at least have the option that is i use the
reply-to-list i can have the list
Gregory Leblanc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 12/20/02 at 20:00:
Doing this means that you have to have some way of replying -other- than
hitting the 'reply' button, in case you want to just send mail to the
original sender. Furthermore, the existing code to make 'reply-to-list'
I
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 22:27, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
My annoyances, as is, are:
- reply to all means original poster gets two copies. Why?
I've grown to appreciate getting two copies for a mailing list reply
involving me. Why? Because the direct post actually ends in my primary
INBOX thus
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 16:21, Ray Hunter wrote:
Is there a way to run a script that would populate the reply-to with the
list name?
I know enough about perl to know that it can accomplish this, but not
enough to write that script. The script would have to identify the
message by the X-mail-list
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 19:37, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:27, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 14:36, Ray Hunter wrote:
I would like the reply-to field to populate to the list email
address...is this possible?
So would I, but we seem to be in the
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:37, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
Doing this means that you have to have some way of replying -other- than
hitting the 'reply' button, in case you want to just send mail to the
original sender.
As a recent switcher from Gnus, I miss this functionality terribly. In
that
Replies to a couple of posts enclosed.
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:54, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 19:37, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:27, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 14:36, Ray Hunter wrote:
I would like the reply-to field to
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 23:08, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
Replies to a couple of posts enclosed.
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:54, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 19:37, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:27, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 14:36, Ray
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 20:40, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 23:08, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
Replies to a couple of posts enclosed.
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:54, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 19:37, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:27,
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 21:55, Barry Grundy wrote:
--- I wrote:
When I hit Reply, the composer window
appears
with the original message quoted as ascii-armored
text, not decrypted text.
Bah! I should have checked deeper before posting.
Minutes after sending this I received an
Hi,
When I receive an encrypted e-mail, I find that no
matter how I approach it, I cannot reply to the
decrypted message with portions of the original
quoted. When I hit Reply, the composer window appears
with the original message quoted as ascii-armored
text, not decrypted text. Even
--- I wrote:
When I hit Reply, the composer window
appears
with the original message quoted as ascii-armored
text, not decrypted text.
Bah! I should have checked deeper before posting.
Minutes after sending this I received an encrypted
message from a co-worker that also uses Evolution.
I meant that it is already there for 1.1
Jeff
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 14:39, Richard Zach wrote:
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1587
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-16 11:20 ---
Jeff, how do you reply to an attached message? There's no
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 09:45, Janus Christensen wrote:
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 18:01, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
P.S. If you want to have a button for that handy on the toolbar,
there's a patch that I posted to the list that will replace the
reply-to-all with something more useful.
Hmmm,
What version of Evolution supports auto-cc?
auto-cc would work for me, but the one I am using now is Debian Woody
one (1.0.3).
Andy
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 19:51, Not Zed wrote:
Then you auto-cc it.
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 01:03, Andy Cedilnik wrote:
Well, what if
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 12:48, Larry Ewing wrote:
[...] Or even better would be a
reply button dropdown like the New button that had all the reply
options but set the default action based on the heuristic above.
Your New button has a drop-down ? Mine sure don't (Evo 1.0.5 snap on
RedHat 6.2).
Have you never used any other mail client? Every mail client strips your
address when doing a Reply-to-All.
Jeff
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 11:24, Ryan P Skadberg wrote:
I have to agree with David here. Having to set up a VFolder or mailing
list to have a simple conversation is ridiculous. This
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 12:48, Larry Ewing wrote:
You know, what would be really nice is if there was a Reply to like
magic button that looked for list headers and replied to the list in
that case and did reply to all otherwise. Or even better would be a
reply button dropdown like the New
Both of these features are available in the development branch only.
--Larry
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 12:35, Richard Bellavance wrote:
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 12:48, Larry Ewing wrote:
[...] Or even better would be a
reply button dropdown like the New button that had all the reply
options
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 13:23, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Have you never used any other mail client? Every mail client strips your
address when doing a Reply-to-All.
Netscape Messenger doesn't, at least not on recent Linux versions.
--
Jonathan F. Dill ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
UMBI CARB IT Coordinator
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 10:23, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Have you never used any other mail client? Every mail client strips your
address when doing a Reply-to-All.
Except, as I said, Eudora, has an option (I just checked). To quote it:
When replying to all:
[ ] Include yourself
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 18:48, Larry Ewing wrote:
You know, what would be really nice is if there was a Reply to like
magic button that looked for list headers and replied to the list in
that case and did reply to all otherwise.
Actually, Gnus does this. If I remember correctly, I only ever
Then you auto-cc it.
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 01:03, Andy Cedilnik wrote:
Well, what if you are not the only one reading the mail?
Support mails for example are going to several people and other people
want to know what somebody responded.
Andy
On Wed, 2002-05-08 at
hah!
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 12:48, Larry Ewing wrote:
You know, what would be really nice is if there was a Reply to like
magic button that looked for list headers and replied to the list in
that case and did reply to all otherwise. Or even better would be a
reply button dropdown like the
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 01:31, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
OK, now it's REALLY time for a flame... Why aren't any of you people
using Evolution's Reply-to-list feature?!?!? I sure don't need to get
another copy of your mails to the evolution mailing list. Please,
figure it out!
Because it helps
Using CVS of evolution, gal, gtkhtml, soup
Seems related to my bug 19649. Now, instead of replying to the correct
mail and putting the replied-to status on the wrong email, it actually
replies to the wrong email.
Steps:
- Turn off preview pane
- un-select hide deleted
- double-click on a
hi :)
I noticed a strange effect. I received a mail with html-attachment - a
html table. When replying evo converted this html-table to a
non-html-table, with lines and colums. I could activate one line and
evo gave me a dotted border around it and so on. Nice. But evo got lazy.
Very very lazy.
I was emailed a virus today, a double-extension thing claiming to be
MIME type audio but in fact an executable with extension .pif. The
sender's address was mangled with a leading underscore to discourage
reply. (Of course, since I use evo, I wasn't infected. ;-)
Evo displayed the content as a
Evo displayed the content as a tiny square embedded edit pane with
horizontal and vertical scrollbars.
The virus is an HTML message with an iframe element containing the
attachment, which tricks Outlook (and OE?) into opening the attachment
without the user saying so. The HTML says iframe
Hi all,
Reply:
When there is a reply-to in the header, I cannot reply to the sender, or
all recipients.
I already posted a mail about this, but I still find it very annoying,
that I have to copy paste the addresses each time.
So please correct this, and reply to the address set in the
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 21:06, Jim Meyer wrote:
Ahh, you've struck another bit of fun I've been having. Neither my
office or my ISP will allow relaying from outside their internal
networks; however, both will allow relaying regardless of claimed source
address from within their internal
Hello!
I'm having all sorts of fun with the fact that Evo always uses your
default account to reply from, even if the mail was sent to a different
source account. It's particularly hitting me hard on this list, where
I've got my personal account on the list; as you may have guessed, it's
my work
It does, but I guess the logic is off a bit or something.
I don't know, I can't find the problem...
Jeff
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 13:46, Jim Meyer wrote:
Hello!
I'm having all sorts of fun with the fact that Evo always uses your
default account to reply from, even if the mail was sent to a
Yes, that is correct behavior - you can change the smtp server you use,
it is just a good default to auto-set...don't you think?
Jeff
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 14:16, Mike Strock wrote:
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 10:46, Jim Meyer wrote:
Hello!
I'm having all sorts of fun with the fact that Evo
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 11:35, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Yes, that is correct behavior - you can change the smtp server you use,
it is just a good default to auto-set...don't you think?
I would think that since you are creating a new account (which may or
may not have knowledge of the other
But pretend you are setting up evolution to check mail from your work
address and your isp mail address, you'd want both accounts to use your
isp's smtp server
and if your isp mail address was your default (as it would be if you
were setting up your home box), then when you created your work
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 13:03, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
It does, but I guess the logic is off a bit or something.
I don't know, I can't find the problem...
I would love to help locate why this is happening if I can. I find it
very annoying. I have a POP account set up for home and an IMAP
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 19:49, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
But pretend you are setting up evolution to check mail from your work
address and your isp mail address, you'd want both accounts to use your
isp's smtp server
It's a side point - I agree with the behaviour of 'guessing' an SMTP
server; but
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 11:49, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
But pretend you are setting up evolution to check mail from your work
address and your isp mail address, you'd want both accounts to use your
isp's smtp server
and if your isp mail address was your default (as it would be if you
were
Hi!
How can I reply to the sender when the email arrived from a mailing
list?
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I choose reply to sender, reply or reply to all, every possibility
results in the same thing: I am replying to the list.
0.15
On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 04:59, Bognar Attila wrote:
How can I reply to the sender when the email arrived from a mailing
list?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I choose reply to sender, reply or reply to all, every possibility
On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 13:41, Miles Lane wrote:
On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 06:33, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 04:59, Bognar Attila wrote:
How can I reply to the sender when the email arrived from a mailing
list?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 09:23:25PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 13:41, Miles Lane wrote:
On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 06:33, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Sat, 2001-10-27 at 04:59, Bognar Attila wrote:
How can I reply to the sender when the email arrived from a mailing
list?
Is there a way to set a rule or filter to set my reply to address based
on what mailing list I am responding to?
-Paul Rodríguez
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
sön 2001-09-16 klockan 09.53 skrev Bo Rosén:
Actually, I'm not sure that is the correct term.
The line beginning a reply (Sun 16 Sep John Doe wrote) does not display
Never mind. Fixed in latest snap.
Cheers,
Bo
--
Bo Rosen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GPG/PGP Public Key at
When I get an email that has a large recipient list (~9 people), and I hit Reply To All, Evolution freezes. I have to do killev to get out. Even the Reply button takes a lng time to be processed. I am using a recent CVS version.
Ujwal
On Wed, 2001-09-12 at 22:21, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote:
When I get an email that has a large recipient list (~9 people), and I
hit Reply To All, Evolution freezes. I have to do killev to get out.
Even the Reply button takes a lng time to be processed. I am
using a recent CVS version.
Hi !
I'd like to choose if I want to reply as HTML or not for each mail.
Currently, the composer doesn't put back HTML attributes to the reply if
you check the Format-HTML menu item.
Xav
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 24 May 2001 07:32:53 -0700, lee johnson wrote:
also ( sorry if previously covered ) I can't seem to get an email
address ( when i click on TO or CC etc. ) to get put in the To or CC
field when chosen..
is this somehow related to the :contacts gone thread??
It's very possible. If
sometimes when I hit reply
it takes forever for the message window to come upsimilar to length
of time for evo to start up...only sometimes though
also ( sorry if previously covered ) I can't seem to get an email
address ( when i click on TO or CC etc. ) to get put in the To or CC
63 matches
Mail list logo
