[Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-01 Thread Fred Perloff
I am running sendmail on my localhost. It dumps my mail in /var/spool/mail/$USER. Then I am running procmail to filter spam. Right now procmail is moving filtered mail to $HOME/mail where I read it with pine. I would like to use evolution as my MUA. Can someone help me with the syntax for the pro

Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-01 Thread Juan Martinez
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host > > I am running sendmail on my localhost. It dumps my mail in > /var/spool/mail/$USER. Then I am running procmail to filter spam. Right > now procm

Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-01 Thread Brian
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 13:41, Juan Martinez wrote: > You should not have procmail filter your mail into mailboxes that > evolution handles directly. Having procmail change the contents of > those mailboxes will make for a bad situation with evolution. How's that? If he uses procmail to sort mai

Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-01 Thread Brian
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 15:56, Juan Martinez wrote: > I got this from [EMAIL PROTECTED] back in December 2001. Perhaps things > are different now. Ahhh ... so it was a potential locking difference between procmail and evolution. Fair enough. Eh, flat files suck. Not Zed's recommendation is righ

Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-01 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 15:07, Brian wrote: > On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 15:56, Juan Martinez wrote: > > I got this from [EMAIL PROTECTED] back in December 2001. Perhaps things > > are different now. > > Ahhh ... so it was a potential locking difference between procmail and > evolution. Fair enough.

Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-01 Thread Juan Martinez
sync." Juan On 1 May 2002, Brian wrote: > Date: 01 May 2002 14:34:55 -0400 > From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host > > On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 13:41, Juan Martinez

Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-01 Thread Not Zed
There's at least one guy at Ximian who uses procmail to filter into a maildir tree, and then uses evolution to read it at the same time. It works reasonably well. I'm sorry I dont know how to setup procmail to operate this way. The original poster could try using the 'spool directory' option f

Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-01 Thread Rich Rudnick
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 08:34, Fred Perloff wrote: > I am running sendmail on my localhost. It dumps my mail in > /var/spool/mail/$USER. Then I am running procmail to filter spam. Right > now procmail is moving filtered mail to $HOME/mail where I read it with > pine. > > I would like to use evoluti

Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-02 Thread Fred Chagnon
> I got this from [EMAIL PROTECTED] back in December 2001. Perhaps things > are different now. > > Read the thread beginning with this message: > > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2001-December/015326.html > > The subject of the thread is: > "Summary and folder mismatch, even

Re: [Evolution] sendmail -> procmail -> evolution, all on local host

2002-05-02 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 08:34, Fred Perloff wrote: > I am running sendmail on my localhost. It dumps my mail in > /var/spool/mail/$USER. Then I am running procmail to filter spam. Right > now procmail is moving filtered mail to $HOME/mail where I read it with > pine. > > I would like to use evoluti