On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 00:38, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Sat, 2001-09-29 at 13:23, Jeremy White wrote:
> > Thanks, JP. Finally built evo from source today, but the behavior
> > of Evolution seems unchanged. I can create a new Address Source
> > that's an LDAP server, but I do not know how to store m
On Tue, 2001-10-02 at 22:06, Jeremy White wrote:
>
> When I initially add my LDAP server, it appears in the list under the
> 'regular'
> LDAP servers. When it's selected, at that point, the options to add a
> new contact
> and so forth are all greyed out. If, however, I request to open the
>
1 contact
you ever look up.) Base means "look at just the root dn of the query".
One is "every direct child of the rootdn", and Sub is "the entire
subtree rooted at rootdn."
Try changing it to One - i think that's the default for ldapsearch.
toshok
>
>
hrm...
HEAD evolution has given the user the choice of authenticating based on
email or DN for some time now, and the fix was recently backported to
the 1-0-branch for the 1.0.3 release.
Chris
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 07:09, Costin Cozan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the original evolution source, an LD
So, when remotely displaying from my sparc to a machine on the same lan
it takes 48 seconds to bring up the first window. This change to
genrand.c (rolling orbit2's genuid_simple in, and using that when
buf_len is 8 or more) drops it down to 18 seconds.
Displaying locally the time after the patc
doh, fixed the return statement without a return value.
Chris
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 18:37, Chris Toshok wrote:
> So, when remotely displaying from my sparc to a machine on the same lan
> it takes 48 seconds to bring up the first window. This change to
> genrand.c (rolling
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 08:17, Jeff Beley wrote:
> Where would I go about changing the ldap query for type-ahead? The
> ldap server I'm using has several thousand entries and the
> administrator has limited the complexity of the queries, so when I
> type j in the address box, the query
> (|(display
On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 12:37, Romañuk Martin TECHTEL wrote:
> Hi, I would like to know if the posibillity to add contacts from the
> LDAP source exists?,
> like in Mozilla, where you can type the contact name, and the email
> address is validated
> using the ldap source.
in cvs HEAD evolution you
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 10:55, Sean Atkinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at Evolution's LDAP support - all seems to be working nicely. However I
>expected double-clicking an entry in the Directory Servers configuration to open its
>edit dialog. Since it didn't, please find attached a patch to
Local contact databases now get a summary file generated for them. It
should speed up all queries that exist in the UI by a large margin. On
my machine it drops an "Email is" query over 20k contacts from ~20
seconds to < 1 second. So completion when using local folders should
also be substantia
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 04:32, Sean Atkinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached a patch to fix the addressbook crashing when "Show Supported
>Bases" is clicked a few times in an LDAP server's configuration dialog, but the
>server's not running. ESelectionModel *selection_model e_table_get_sel
I added support for an actual result for searches (god I can't believe
we hadn't added this earlier...) This should help with LDAP
autocompletion (as soon as I write the code), since if the search
completes successfully we'll be able to cache the results.
Right now, the following results are ava
I sent this yesterday but sent it from my home address so mailman is
holding it, heh.
> I just (today) committed some fixes for crashes in the LDAP backend
> dealing with searches. I'd like to hear from the brave people that
> use
> ldap sources for autocompletion if it helps with the wombat cr
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 06:46, Anders Bengtsson wrote:
> tor 2002-09-26 klockan 13.31 skrev Jonne Zutt:
> > Since I upgraded to evolution 1.1.1.99 (from 1.0.8),
> > I have a problem with my Contacts folder.
> > The first time I click on it, it is empty.
> > If I click the 'Clear' button, it shows al
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 04:31, Jonne Zutt wrote:
> Since I upgraded to evolution 1.1.1.99 (from 1.0.8),
> I have a problem with my Contacts folder.
> The first time I click on it, it is empty.
> If I click the 'Clear' button, it shows all of
> my contacts, but warns with this message:
> 'This query
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 03:15, Germano Cesari wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 19:06, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > If it's the "Contacts" folder under "Local Folders" in the folder tree,
> > the path is ~/evolution/local/Contacts. The actual .db file is
>
Firstly, this should be discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - this is the
list devoted to development issues, not user issues.
You're not giving a whole lot of information about your setup -
certainly not enough to debug your problem. You alluded to the fact
there were ownership issues with the direct
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 03:44, Germano Cesari wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Im using evolution 1.0.8, everything works fine concering emails, but
> when I click on the Contacts folder, I get the following message:
>
> "We were unable to open this addressbook. Please check that the path
> exists and that you hav
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 08:38, Paul Hands wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I read the knowledge base article on what to with libdb3.1.17, and did
> as suggested by clicking on the link to sleepycat.com.
> I made a directory, /export/home/evolution, then a subdirectory libdb,
> inside which the db-3.1.17 directo
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 13:13, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 16:08, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
>
> > > Mine seems to be able to handle all but UCS2. Are you saying you see
> > > UCS2 in your libiconv's aliases.gperf? Maybe I need to add this.
> >
> > *shrug* I got it from `iconv -
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 19:57, gilbert fang wrote:
> 1) If our ldap server has some different attribute name for one
> attribute, for example "familyphone" which has the same meaning with
> homephone.
> How can I make evolution know this attribute and show it in ldap
> addressbook?
> Do we have
Yeah if there's a libldap.la we pull in the dependency_libs from there
since we don't link with the .la file (IIRC).
Chris
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 07:44, Joaquim Fellmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that somewhere during the wombat compilation something is
> trying to link against the pam librar
22 matches
Mail list logo
