Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-23 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 06:30, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 22:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > changed to mimic Outlook's functionality which uses alphebtic keys for > > searching which meant that we had to use ',' and '.' or '[' and ']' > > Does ',' '.' work again ? Last chec

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-23 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 22:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > changed to mimic Outlook's functionality which uses alphebtic keys for > searching which meant that we had to use ',' and '.' or '[' and ']' Does ',' '.' work again ? Last check only '<' and '>' worked, which I believe are also assign

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Not Zed
Actually i have a couple of quick questions, What is the output of the command: camel-index-control info mbox.ibex and does the file shrink when you do: camel-index-control compress mbox.ibex On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 12:56, Ali Akcaagac wrote: > On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 00:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wr

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Not Zed
i'll look into it. i know i tested this when it went in, maybe something's changed. fwiw this sort of stuff still belongs on the evolution users list. On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 12:56, Ali Akcaagac wrote: > On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 00:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > When you delete a message, it isn't

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Ali Akcaagac
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 00:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > When you delete a message, it isn't removed from the mbox file and so > nor is it removed from the ibex files as it is very possible that the > user will decide to undelete it. > > You'll notice that unless you have Evolution set to "Hide Del

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Ali Akcaagac
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 00:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 18:32, Ali Akcaagac wrote: > > On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 23:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > > create a mbox file and try copying 8000-1 emails into that, you get > > > > > a 40-50 mb mbox file. now delete as many mail

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 18:29, Ali Akcaagac wrote: [snip] > > The addressbook doesn't have ibex files as far as I'm aware. > > no, i am generally speaking about the addressbook.db file not the ibex > file. e.g. add 100 addresses and remove them all again. the size of that > file remains in takt, wh

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 18:32, Ali Akcaagac wrote: > On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 23:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > create a mbox file and try copying 8000-1 emails into that, you get > > > > a 40-50 mb mbox file. now delete as many mails until 500 emails remain, > > > > the mbox file decreases to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Ali Akcaagac
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 23:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > create a mbox file and try copying 8000-1 emails into that, you get > > > a 40-50 mb mbox file. now delete as many mails until 500 emails remain, > > > the mbox file decreases to e.g. 5 mb but the index files are keeping > > > their la

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Ali Akcaagac
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 23:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > a) signatures: i am used to the way of 1.0.8 where i could point to my > > signature file and it gets used. with the new evolution i dont have such > > an option and get pointed to the evolution editor to create a new one. > > please make it

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 17:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: [snip] > > > > > c) index files. > > > > 394240 Sep 22 22:57 mbox.ibex.index > > 397556 Sep 22 22:57 mbox.ibex.index.data > > > > create a mbox file and try copying 8000-1 emails into that, you get > > a 40-50 mb mbox file. now d

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 17:06, Ali Akcaagac wrote: > first of all i like the new evolution 1.1.1. it looks cool and works > fine so far but here are some disadvantages that imo was bad. > > a) signatures: i am used to the way of 1.0.8 where i could point to my > signature file and it gets used. wit

[Evolution-hackers] Feedback Evolution 1.1.1

2002-09-22 Thread Ali Akcaagac
first of all i like the new evolution 1.1.1. it looks cool and works fine so far but here are some disadvantages that imo was bad. a) signatures: i am used to the way of 1.0.8 where i could point to my signature file and it gets used. with the new evolution i dont have such an option and get poin