Re: [Evolution-hackers] Verifying of signatures

2003-01-03 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 23:48, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > I find bugzilla quite easy to use, much simpler than debbugs for > example. is there something better? Dunno. As far as reporting bugs goes, the reportbug script of Debian is sufficient in most cases, while I find the bugzilla frontend very c

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Verifying of signatures

2003-01-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 17:12, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: [snip] > I don't care which rfc is followed. 2015 or 3156, all I see is that > evolution is quite often not verifying signatures, and when I ask, all > of the others (except fellow evolution victims) can verify the > signature

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Verifying of signatures

2003-01-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Would you please attach them to bugzilla anyway? I want to be 100% sure that I am looking at the raw message sources as they are in your mbox file(s). Thanks. Jeff On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 16:59, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:37, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Verifying of signatures

2003-01-02 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:37, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:32, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > [snip] > > > Here are the cases I've had recently: > > > - I can't verify messages I've sent myself when the attachment is a > > > rfc822-message (what's that MIME type again? You know wha

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Verifying of signatures

2003-01-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:32, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: [snip] > > Here are the cases I've had recently: > > - I can't verify messages I've sent myself when the attachment is a > > rfc822-message (what's that MIME type again? You know what I mean). > > (evo 1.2.1, gpg 1.2.1) > > I'll look into this,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Verifying of signatures

2003-01-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 05:11, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > Yo! > > I'm a bit disappointed by Evo 1.2.x - I've heard rumour that it now > fixes all known GPG related bugs. Dropping inline support is imho not a > fix, but I can understand it. it is the only fix that can be done. no

[Evolution-hackers] Verifying of signatures

2002-12-23 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
Yo! I'm a bit disappointed by Evo 1.2.x - I've heard rumour that it now fixes all known GPG related bugs. Dropping inline support is imho not a fix, but I can understand it. As for MIME: I've still quite a few problems. Here are the cases I've had recently: - I can't verify messages I've sent my