Hi all,
I have on two different installations the same problem.
The customized search edit field simply doesn't work.
After selecting the type of search (e.g. subject contain, sender
contain...) and typing the search string, every time zero mails will be
displayed.
However there are many mails
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 10:23 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
I disagree. I disagree that the inconsistency is occasional. Rather
it is nearly constant. /Occasionally/ the count is correct.
2.24.3 here as well (Ubuntu Intrepid). I agree with Alex. Mis-count is
constant. I have a search
Initial Problem - after upgrade of OS, Evolution's Junk filter dumped
all mail to junk.
SOLUTION: just delete and recreate all folder filters.
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 00:14 -0800, Scott wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded to Linux Mint 6 and reinstalled Evolution (2.24.2).
I also combined 3
I recently upgraded from Ubuntu Hardy to Ubuntu Intrepid. Most of my
GNOME software worked well upon upgrade, there were even some
improvements. However, a major piece of GNOME software that I use every
single day and that is important to both my personal life and business
stopped functioning
Hi all,
I just found the answer myself.
This is a funny bug, because this behaviour disappears as soon as I
created a search folder (don't know if this is the right word for the
English localised version, I am using the German one and there it is
named Suchordner). Afterwards after the first to
Hi Timo,
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:12 +0200, Timo Steuerwald wrote:
Hi all,
I have on two different installations the same problem.
The customized search edit field simply doesn't work.
After selecting the type of search (e.g. subject contain, sender
contain...) and typing the search
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 18:10 +0200, Timo Steuerwald wrote:
Hi all,
I just found the answer myself.
This is a funny bug, because this behaviour disappears as soon as I
created a search folder (don't know if this is the right word for the
English localised version, I am using the German one
While I am as frustrated as you with some of the bugs and regressions
that you mention, I don't think it is constructive, or even in your self
interest, to take such a scolding and tattling tone with people, many of
whom volunteer, to provide you with software for free.
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at
I deeply agree every single character of this post.
In addition, there should also be some fundamental design problem with
the new backend. As far as I understand, its goal was to speed up
certain operations, but what I can see is just the opposite. Beyond that
it is very unstable and unreliable
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:04 -0400, Andrew Montalenti wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 10:23 -0500, Art Alexion wrote:
I disagree. I disagree that the inconsistency is occasional.
Rather
it is nearly constant. /Occasionally/ the count is correct.
2.24.3 here as well (Ubuntu Intrepid). I
Hi Scott!
After I created the first one, all others will also appear immediately.
BTW: I also used only very basic queries like sender contains
any...@somewhere.com
Cheers
Timo
Am Mittwoch, den 08.04.2009, 09:33 -0700 schrieb Scott Richards:
That would appear to be random behaviour. I just
Art,
[reply below]
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:35 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
While I am as frustrated as you with some of the bugs and regressions
that you mention, I don't think it is constructive, or even in your
self interest, to take such a scolding and tattling tone with people,
many of
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:55 -0400, Andrew Montalenti wrote:
Art,
[reply below]
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:35 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
While I am as frustrated as you with some of the bugs and
regressions
that you mention, I don't think it is constructive, or even in your
self
I've been thinking about a way I could take Art's advice and make my
criticism more constructive. The only thing I can think of is by
volunteering my own time to organize a bug squash day for Evolution.
Is there already something like this scheduled? If not, what's the best
way for me to
Art,
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:11 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
And while I agree that the developers should take stock of whether they
envision themselves as working on a widely deployed production
application, and release accordingly, I think much of the blame may like
with the Ubuntu packagers,
I suspect that the best thing all round is to take this to the
evolution-hackers list since this is primarily a users list.
P.
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:14 -0400, Andrew Montalenti wrote:
I've been thinking about a way I could take Art's advice and make my
criticism more constructive. The
In my case, doing an evolution --force-shutdown and then a restart
always fixes the unread message count upon restart. But then, it
becomes inaccurate again the moment I send a new e-mail.
You are lucky. At least the vfolders constantly display wrong number of
unread messages. Moreover the
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:43 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
rm -rf ~/.evolutionn/exchange/
should this have the double n's
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:01 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:43 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
rm -rf ~/.evolutionn/exchange/
should this have the double n's
Only if I want the script to fail :-(
--
Art Alexion
MIS
x3075
Hello everyone,
I am trying to import my ACT! contacts to Evolution. I have the contact
list in CSV but when I import it to Evolution, it imports it as is with
no way to map the fields. The contacts are all in incorrect fields. Is
there any way to import contacts correctly to Evolution? Thank
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:23 -0400, Andrew Montalenti wrote:
Though I agree that the Ubuntu maintainers probably should have done
more testing of Evolution in order to declare it a show-stopper, the
problem is that Ubuntu considers the GNOME stable release to be a
baseline. Ubuntu rarely
Art, one clarification:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
And that is precisely the problem. N+1 is appropriate for Debian
Experimental, but not for Debian Stable. Ubuntu doesn't have those
designations, and when a new version of the distro is released, it is
released
22 matches
Mail list logo
