On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 18:29 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On 5 September 2013 09:43, Pete Biggs wrote:
> The only reliable way is to use sendmail. If you need a copy
> of the
> message, then BCC: yourself and within Evolution setup a
> filter to move
> the me
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 09:43 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > i use a shell script to generate some emails (without user interaction)
> > by appending content to file ~/.evolution/mail/local/Outbox .
> I think there should be a mechanism in Linux whereby when people try and
> play around with an applica
Am Donnerstag, den 05.09.2013, 09:59 +0200 schrieb Stephan Skrodzki:
> Hello Tobias,
>
> although I do not know if this is possible at all with evolution. Is
> there any special reason why you do not use the "unix standards" for
> such purposes?
>
> The command line "mail" program could be perfe
On 5 September 2013 09:43, Pete Biggs wrote:
> The only reliable way is to use sendmail. If you need a copy of the
> message, then BCC: yourself and within Evolution setup a filter to move
> the message to the Sentmail folder.
>
I've found http://caspian.dotconf.net/menu/Software/SendEmail/ to
>
> i use a shell script to generate some emails (without user interaction)
> by appending content to file ~/.evolution/mail/local/Outbox .
I think there should be a mechanism in Linux whereby when people try and
play around with an applications *private* files there's a big hand that
comes out
Hello Tobias,
although I do not know if this is possible at all with evolution. Is
there any special reason why you do not use the "unix standards" for
such purposes?
The command line "mail" program could be perfectly used for sending
mails from scripts as long as you have set up an MTA (postfix
Hi,
i use a shell script to generate some emails (without user interaction)
by appending content to file ~/.evolution/mail/local/Outbox .
This works fine until i update evolution to V3.4.4 (now).
I recognized that evolution uses a new mail storage/organization format
after update.
I tried to
