On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 05:59 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> David, by your point of view, with quasi everybody add to the Cc header,
> why do we have mailing lists at all?
For one reason, mailing lists exist because they are public and have
archives, and because people who are interested in the maili
Hi,
Is there any way to keep the same (or almost) HTML format when
replying ?
Setting reply format to HTML doesn't help as the original message format
is still lost.
Some discussion about this (for kmail) :
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86423
Thanks
___
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 10:03 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 14:22 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > But again, it's common sense on most lists
>
> It's not "common sense", in any way. Someone who's never used mailing
> lists before will not just inherently understand this without ne
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 08:16 +, D'Eimar De Jabrun Guillaume wrote:
> Is there any way to keep the same (or almost) HTML format when
> replying ?
> Setting reply format to HTML doesn't help as the original message format
> is still lost.
Please always mention your Evolution version. Also, what d
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 08:58 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 05:59 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > David, by your point of view, with quasi everybody add to the Cc header,
> > why do we have mailing lists at all?
>
> For one reason, mailing lists exist because they are public and
Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet
again. Do they ever think these things through?
A full account restore from a system of a different host name resulted
in doubled online accounts in $HOME/.config/evolution/sources.
Like so:
$ grep AccountId=account_142551425
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote:
> Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet
> again. Do they ever think these things through?
I have no idea who is "they" but if you're after being aggressive,
https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/CodeOfConduct is worth
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote:
> Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet
> again. Do they ever think these things through?
You are using an Alpha release of a distro with a development release of
an application ... and you didn't expect pain??
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 17:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote:
> > Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet
> > again. Do they ever think these things through?
>
> I have no idea who is "they" but if you're after being agg
I'm running Linux Mint 17.1 which is authenticated thru our windows active
directory. No problems there.
Added my employers email account into Evolution via mapi (Evolution version
3.10.4); authenticated without a problem.
I can see my contacts, calendar, tasks, etc.; now comes the problem.
W
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 12:26 -0500, Richardson, Steve wrote:
> When I click on the mail account, I get a red banner with the heading,
> "Failed to open folder." That's followed by a smaller line stating,
> "The reported error was "The name org.gnome.KrbAuthDialog was not
> provided by any .service
That did it; much thanks!
SDR
-Original Message-
From: Andre Klapper
mailto:andre%20klapper%20%3cak...@gmx.net%3e>>
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
mailto:%22evolution-l...@gnome.org%22%20%3cevolution-l...@gnome.org%3e>>
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Cannot get email on machine authenticated t
In the message rules, is there a equivalent to an "OR" statement within
a condition? One of my filter rules is dependent on the "sender" with a
variable of different subject lines. Adding an additional condition with
rule match to "any" won't work.
Example:
Sender: Contains: email address
Subject:
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 17:07 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote:
> > Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery
> yet
> > again. Do they ever think these things through?
>
> You are using an Alpha release of a distro with a developme
On 03/17/2015 05:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 17:07 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote:
>>> Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery
>> yet
>>> again. Do they ever think these things through?
>> You ar
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2015, 21:19 + schrieb Justin Musgrove:
> In the message rules, is there a equivalent to an "OR" statement within
> a condition? One of my filter rules is dependent on the "sender" with a
> variable of different subject lines. Adding an additional condition with
> rule ma
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 21:19 +, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> In the message rules, is there a equivalent to an "OR" statement
> within a condition?
>
> CentOS 7, Evo 3.8.5 "EWS"
Hi,
not for your version, but the upcoming 3.16.0 has so called "Free form
expressions" where you can combine '
17 matches
Mail list logo
