[Evolution] scripting/fasting the add of remote agenda?

2020-09-17 Thread Marc Chantreux via evolution-list
hello people, I work at Renater (the french Research and Education Network) and we start to promote lightweight alternatives to our online services. I don't think Gnome can be seen as "lightweight" but evolution is by far the best graphical MUA/caldav client i ever seen. I still use mutt which is

Re: [Evolution] scripting/fasting the add of remote agenda?

2020-09-17 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 12:16 +0200, Marc Chantreux via evolution-list wrote: > also: we use debian stable as reference (because it's stable and > simple for endusers) so i'm not on the last version of evolution. Hi, it would be good to know the Evolution version, as I've absolutely no idea

Re: [Evolution] scripting/fasting the add of remote agenda?

2020-09-17 Thread Marc Chantreux via evolution-list
hello, > it would be good to know the Evolution version > It's important, things could change meanwhile of course! sorry... i'm too used to talk with debian users. evolution 3.30.5-1.1 > > now my first question: let's say i want to visualize the remote > > agendas of my colleages in evoluti

Re: [Evolution] scripting/fasting the add of remote agenda?

2020-09-17 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 15:36 +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote: > not really shared as i don't need write rights. Hi, I meant 'shared' as 'being used by multiple users', not necessarily as 'being updated by multiple users'. > so i have to update to test it (File/new/ don't have the > "Collection

Re: [Evolution] scripting/fasting the add of remote agenda?

2020-09-17 Thread Marc Chantreux via evolution-list
hello, > I do not recall whether 3.30.5 has it, you can also try > Edit->Accounts->Add->Collection Account. there is no entry there either. I have: * Mail Accounts * Adress Books * Calendars * Memo Lists * Task Lists I realize it will be easier for everyone if i have a recent

Re: [Evolution] scripting/fasting the add of remote agenda?

2020-09-17 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 16:12 +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote: > there is no entry there either. Hi, it was added later then, it seems. > I realize it will be easier for everyone if i have a recent version. :) > How hard is it to compile from sources? Check out yourself: https://wiki.gnome.o

Re: [Evolution] scripting/fasting the add of remote agenda?

2020-09-17 Thread Marc Chantreux via evolution-list
hello Milan, > https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution/Building may I propose a version of your script which works fine with set -u ? export PATH=$PREFIX/bin${PATH+:}${PATH:-} export XDG_DATA_DIRS=$PREFIX/share${XDG_DATA_DIRS+:}${XDG_DATA_DIRS:-} export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PREFIX/lib export PKG_CONFI

[Evolution] Message Search without AT-SPI

2020-09-17 Thread Greg Oliver via evolution-list
Hi, When searching "message body" in evolution, it tries to invoke AT-SPI (with Fedora anyhow). I disable AT-SPI completely, so the results never come : Sep 17 15:50:17 localhost.localdomain dbus-broker-launch[1247]: Activation request for 'org.a11y.atspi.Registry' failed. Sep 17 15:50:17 localh

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-17 Thread Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-list
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 18:39 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 15:48 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > Nothing, if I understand it correctly. Just unfortunate timing. > > Correct. I blindly bumped all 3.36/3-36 to 3.38/3-38, including the > runtime version, not th

Re: [Evolution] scripting/fasting the add of remote agenda?

2020-09-17 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 21:48 +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote: > may I propose a version of your script which works fine with set -u ? Hi, I'm sorry, I do not know what you mean. > I need libical from sources so i'll try to get  them but > for now I run out of time. I'll try later. Well, the p

Re: [Evolution] Message Search without AT-SPI

2020-09-17 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 15:56 -0500, Greg Oliver via evolution-list wrote: > It appears to call WebKit, which in turn uses the accessibility > interface for some reason.  Hi, Evolution itself doesn't call AT-SPI on its own, that would be odd. It looks like this is done on the WebKit side, a

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Flatpak build

2020-09-17 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 16:11 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution- list wrote: > Yet I have both the production and dev versions of 0.30,  which as > you > can see is not being seen. Hi, you are building Flatpak, it doesn't read development files from the host system. It looks like th