Re: [Evolution] "Cannot get message", why?

2020-12-04 Thread Chris Ramsden via evolution-list
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:01 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 11:42 +0100, Chris Ramsden via evolution-list > wrote: > > 1. Does Evolution have any tools or support for downloading public > > keys etc? > > Hi, > the Evolution doesn't have any such option,

Re: [Evolution] "Cannot get message", why?

2020-12-04 Thread Chris Ramsden via evolution-list
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 13:07 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:01 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > > > 2. How can I get a later version of the binary for Evolution? My > > > Debian-based distro (LMDE) offers only 3.30.5-1.1. > > > > That's the question for

Re: [Evolution] "Cannot get message", why?

2020-12-04 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:01 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > > 2. How can I get a later version of the binary for Evolution? My > > Debian-based distro (LMDE) offers only 3.30.5-1.1. > > That's the question for your distribution. Maybe you can get it as a > Flatpak, the version from

Re: [Evolution] "Cannot get message", why?

2020-12-04 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 11:42 +0100, Chris Ramsden via evolution-list wrote: > 1. Does Evolution have any tools or support for downloading public > keys etc? Hi, the Evolution doesn't have any such option, but it also doesn't block the key auto-retrieve, unless the application is in the

Re: [Evolution] "Cannot get message", why?

2020-12-04 Thread Chris Ramsden via evolution-list
On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 23:31 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 22:47 +0100, Ángel wrote: > > I suspect evolution is launching gpg and awaiting for gpg to return > > the > > result. Maybe gpg is trying to automatically fetch the key from the > > keyservers and

Re: [Evolution] Evo 3.38 composer oddities

2020-12-04 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 09:27 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > Even if I switch to the plain text version, replying uses the HTML > version. Or rather the default display version is always used, not > what is currently being displayed. Hi, there's a bug for it filled. > How about instead of just

Re: [Evolution] Evo 3.38 composer oddities

2020-12-04 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > Second, when replying to an HTML mail in plain text the conversion of > > the HTML is not good, well, non-existent. All that seems to happen is > > that the markup is removed without any attempt to mimic the layout. > > Straight forward text is acceptable, but with tables it results in >