Il giorno lun, 29/10/2018 alle 15.25 +0100, Francesco Porro via
evolution-list ha scritto:
> > There's a workaround, just run evolution and when the Mail view will be
> > there, run this on a terminal:
> >
> > $ gsettings set org.gnome.evolution.mail thread-children-ascending true
> > After th
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 15:25 +0100, Francesco Porro via evolution-list
wrote:
> > $ gsettings set org.gnome.evolution.mail thread-children-ascending true
>
> ...
>
> I've just tried the workaround on Evolution 3.30.2 (on an updated
> Arch box) and it doesn't seem to work: the ordering of children
Hi Milan,
Il giorno ven, 26/10/2018 alle 11.35 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-
list ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 14:00 +0200, Francesco via evolution-list wrote:
> > Ok, got it.
>
> Hi,
> I've some news. The good news is that Evolution can do it, all the code
> is there. The bad new
On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 14:00 +0200, Francesco via evolution-list wrote:
> Ok, got it.
Hi,
I've some news. The good news is that Evolution can do it, all the code
is there. The bad news is there's a bug in the code. While the default
is to sort "children" ascending, this value is not properl
Il giorno gio, 25/10/2018 alle 09.06 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-
list ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 11:05 +0200, Francesco via evolution-list wrote:
> > I'm wondering if it's useful to update it or not.
>
> Hi,
> there are even older bugs/feature requests which are still valid.
>
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 11:05 +0200, Francesco via evolution-list wrote:
> I'm wondering if it's useful to update it or not.
Hi,
there are even older bugs/feature requests which are still valid.
Adding "me too"-like comments is not helpful, this bug description is
clean, there is not much to
Il giorno mer, 24/10/2018 alle 10.17 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-
list ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 15:42 +0200, Francesco via evolution-list wrote:
> > Yes, it is, but it doesn't seem to follow that logic.
>
> Hi,
> I can reproduce it too, with the current development version, wh
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 15:42 +0200, Francesco via evolution-list wrote:
> Yes, it is, but it doesn't seem to follow that logic.
Hi,
I can reproduce it too, with the current development version, which
means bug [1] is still valid.
Bye,
Milan
[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/sh
Il giorno sab, 20/10/2018 alle 18.57 +0100, Pete Biggs ha scritto:
> > Of course I know how it works basically. But this applies the sorting
> > also to messages *inside* the thread. I don't want it so. I want to get
> > messages of a thread ordered by date/ascending, since there could be
> > repli
> Of course I know how it works basically. But this applies the sorting
> also to messages *inside* the thread. I don't want it so. I want to get
> messages of a thread ordered by date/ascending, since there could be
> replies to oders branches of a thread that come first (and It's simpler
> for
Il giorno ven, 19/10/2018 alle 14.47 +0200, Ángel ha scritto:
> It is indeed possible to get that sorting in evolution. Just click on
> the header of the Date column until you get that one.
Of course I know how it works basically. But this applies the sorting
also to messages *inside* the thread.
It is indeed possible to get that sorting in evolution. Just click on
the header of the Date column until you get that one.
Best regards
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https
About the messages list, in other clients (ie. Thunderbird and Kmail) I
used to have the thread view with threads sorted by date, descending;
"inside" the thread, mails are sorted by date ascending.
The result is: most current threads (with the last reply) listed on the
top, and replies inside the
13 matches
Mail list logo
