Hey there my name is Nichole I saw your profile online and thought you might
like to chat
Add me on msn messanger if your intrested [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:34 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Stijn De Smet wrote:
I'm trying to get IPOIB bonding to work with the hw_csum enabled.
...
When I disable hw_csums, I can start iperf's, pull and replug all cables
and the iperf's run uninterrupted.
This is interesting report,
Koen Segers wrote:
Do you mean that bonding with hw_csum enabled will never work?
no, I meant to say that I am not enough into the details and mechanics
of the hw_csum approach/patch and since I understand it is going to be
removed, I will not look now on going into this report.
Why is
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 16:26 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Why is hw_checksum not submitted to the mainline kernel (and thus
also
removed from ofed)? We definitely want to enable hw_checksum as it
gives
an enormous bandwidth boost with ipoib.
you should ask that the individual/s that are
Doug Ledford wrote:
Hmmm...I'd like to put my $.02 in here. I don't have any visibility
into what drives the OFED schedule, so I have no clue as to why people
don't want to slip the schedule for this change. I'm sure you guys have
your reasons. However, I also happen to be a consumer of this
When do you pack the official RC3 ? Thanks.
--CQ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tziporet Koren
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:40 AM
To: Doug Ledford
Cc: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ewg] Re:
I would prefer not to see OFED 1.3 delayed for this. There will always be
another bug, so you have to close the release and ship at some point. In the
case of these particular bugs, IIRC, the first involved an older HCA that may
not be widely used. The other UDP performance bugs do not have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/30/2008 08:40:10 AM:
Doug Ledford wrote:
Hmmm...I'd like to put my $.02 in here. I don't have any visibility
into what drives the OFED schedule, so I have no clue as to why people
don't want to slip the schedule for this change. I'm sure you guys
have
Tang, Changqing wrote:
When do you pack the official RC3 ? Thanks.
Already packed - mail will go out soon
Tziporet
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Hi,
OFED 1.3 RC3 release is available on
http://www.openfabrics.org/builds/ofed-1.3/release/OFED-1.3-rc3.tgz
To get BUILD_ID run ofed_info
Please report any issues in bugzilla https://bugs.openfabrics.org/
The RC4 release is expected on February 13
Tziporet Vlad
Kossey, Robert wrote:
I would prefer not to see OFED 1.3 delayed for this. There will always be
another bug, so you have to close the release and ship at some point. In the
case of these particular bugs, IIRC, the first involved an older HCA that may
not be widely used. The other UDP
The main reason is not the bugs but the features supported by IBM - CM
support for non SRQ and 4K MTU
These are entirely my opinions, but...
OFED isn't even at RC1 if it's not at feature freeze...
OFED has moved well beyond trying to provide an enterprise distribution to
simply providing an
One of the things driving the OFED 1.3 date is that OFED 1.3 has to be
released before the Plugfest, which starts on March 10. I can deal with
slipping OFED GA date to Feb 25, but I really don't think we should let
it slip into March. How confident are the developers that, if they get
the extra
On 1/30/08, Koen Segers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 16:26 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
you should ask that the individual/s that are signed on the patch
Is this Michael S. Tsirkin?
I don't know where else to find this information.
In the Linux model, each change is a patch
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 14:03 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote:
The main reason is not the bugs but the features supported by IBM - CM
support for non SRQ and 4K MTU
These are entirely my opinions, but...
OFED isn't even at RC1 if it's not at feature freeze...
OFED has moved well beyond trying to
Tziporet wrote,
* Delay 1.3 release in a week
* Do RC4 next week - Feb 6
* Add RC5 on Feb 18 - this will be the GOLD version
* GA release on Feb 25
All - please reply if this is acceptable
I hate to keep slipping this, but I think it is important to get
what RedHat needs into
Hello Tziporet,
the hw checksum patch was removed from OFED 1.3
Tziporet
Could youp please specify which patch has been removed? I still can see a
list of patches under RC3. here they are:
ipoib_0010_Add-high-dma-support-to-ipoib.patch
ipoib_0020_Add-s-g-support-for-IPOIB.patch
thanks, applied 1-2
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Robert,
In response to your question..
A more general question I would like to ask the group is how many people
use OFED from the RH or SUSE distros as
is, as compared with using OFED releases from other sources like the IB
vendors, or building their own from
openfabrics.org? We use
--- kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0120_check_grat_arp_with_cm.patch.orig
2008-01-31 13:33:13.0 +0200
+++ kernel_patches/fixes/ipoib_0120_check_grat_arp_with_cm.patch
2008-01-31 13:33:35.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+commit e1df2907fe4ef6809ad8c849882f6dc7cb6ed7a3
+Author: Moni
20 matches
Mail list logo
