Use "rpm -e --allmatches libsdp-1.1.99-1.ofed1.3.1"?
Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Or Gerlitz
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: [ewg] can't remove o
Sure, that's fine. I don't really have a strong opinion, just wanted to
know what you were up to.
Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Dhabaleswar Panda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:25 PM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
So I can have mpirun_rsh *or* mpiexec, but not both?
Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Dhabaleswar Panda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:15 PM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: Jonathan Perkins; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org;
>
ED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:25 PM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: Tziporet Koren; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ewg] RE: [ofa-general] OFED 1.4-RC1 is available
>
> Thanks for the note. We are taking a look at this.
>
&
I am unable to build MVAPICH2 for multiple compilers:
Building the MVAPICH2 RPM [OFA]...
Running rpmbuild --rebuild --define '_topdir /var/tmp/OFED_topdir'
--define 'di
st %{nil}' --target x86_64 --define '_name mvapich2_gcc' --define 'impl
ofa' --d
efine 'rdma --with-rdma=gen2' --define 'ib_incl
Done.
From: Ronni Zimmermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:45 AM
To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Add ofed 1.4 to bugzilla
Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Tziporet Koren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 2:26 AM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; EWG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Please change SDP owner from Jim to Amir in bugzilla
>
-
> From: Tziporet Koren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 11:24 PM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: EWG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Please change SDP owner from Jim to Amir in bugzilla
>
> Hi Scott,
> Can you change SDP owner to Amir Vadai ([
Done
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Data Center Access Engineering
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: Tziporet Koren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 8:38 AM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: EWG
> Subject: Can you
rics.org; Scott
> Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Subject: Re: [ewg] Need to change iSER module owner in Bugzilla
>
> Erez Zilber wrote:
> > Tziporet,
> >
> >
> > The new owner of the iSER module in Bugzilla is Doron
> Shoham. Who should
> > make this change in Bugzilla&
TECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:19 AM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: Joshua Bernstein; OpenFabrics EWG; [ofa_general]
> Subject: Re: [ewg] RE: [ofa-general] how do I use uDAPL with iWARP?
>
>
>
> Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen) wrote:
> > I tried that,
> > I tried that, and it didn't work:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# grep eth /etc/dat.conf
> > OpenIB-cma u1.2 nonthreadsafe default libdaplcma.so.1 dapl.1.2
> > "eth2 0"
> > ""
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dtest
> > 10194 Running as server - OpenIB-cma
> > 10194 Error dat_ep_create: DAT_INVALID_HAN
94: EP free: 0.00 usec
10194: TOTAL: 106.57 usec
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Data Center Access Engineering
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua Bernstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:05 PM
>
I have OFED 1.3 and a Chelsio S310E-SR+ iWARP 10GE NIC. I have
ib_rdma_lat working, so I know IB verbs are working.
How do I use uDAPL, though? All the default /etc/dat.conf entries have
IPoIB or bonding interfaces in them.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Data Center Access Engineer
Can you elaborate on "improve failover mechanism", will it improve the
problems I see in https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541?
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
From: [EMAIL PROTE
I created version 1.3rc5 in the OF bugzilla.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tziporet Koren
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 6:37 AM
I don't think I've ever seen problems running IPoIB between mlx4 and
mthca.
Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:08 PM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen); Betsy Zeller
> Cc: OpenFabrics
It's back up now.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:57 AM
To: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ofa-general]
I can't seem to get to it
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
t; To: Weikuan Yu; Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ofa-general] RE: [ewg] Not seeing any SDP
> performance changes inOFED 1.3 beta, and I get Oops when
> enabling sdp_zcopy_thresh
>
> Hi,
> 64K is borderline f
/bonding/bonding.k
o
/usr/bin/ib-bond
/usr/share/doc/ib-bonding-0.9.0/ib-bonding.txt
> -Original Message-
> From: Moni Shoua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:44 AM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: Or Gerlitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Moni Levy
Or,
I don't see /sbin/call_ifenslave in my OFED-1.3-20080115-0600 ib-bonding
package.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a
Linux svbu-qa1850-1 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 16:36:54 EDT 2007
x86_64 x8
6_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -ql ib-bonding
/lib/modules/2.6.9-55.ELsmp/updates/
Isn't RHEL4 up6 supported, too?
I have added Version 1.3rc2 to bugzilla.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Tziporet Koren
> Sent: Wedn
Unit
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Mott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:29 PM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ofa-general] RE: [ewg] Not seeing any SDP
> performance chan
I have added version 1.3rc1 to bugzilla, sorry for the delay.
Scott
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tziporet
Koren
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 8:40 AM
To: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Cc: [EMAI
t; 9) DONE: Backport work needed to support 2.6.24
>
> 10) TODO: Package user space libsdp for Redhat
> This is supposed to be easy to do, but it will take me some time
> to figure out the detail.
>
> 11) DONE: BUG: Memory leak
> 11/20 [PATCH 1/1 v2] SDP - Fix a memory
> > Did not see this problem with OFED 1.2 or 1.2.5.
>
> Are you 100% sure ? Same HCAs and firmware ?
100% sure.
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
> That's what I was afraid of and asked about on the list a while ago
> (about whether there was such a use case and there is) :-(
>
> Not sure exactly why this wasn't a problem prior to this change.
> When was the last time you tried this on a subnet which
> included one or
> more of these HCAs
I'll open a bug.
> All two port HCAs ? Are all of them the same 2 port PCIe model or are
> there others ?
All type of 2 port PCIe HCAs (LionCub, LionMini, and Eagle).
> Can you provide:
>
> smpquery nodedesc
> smpquery nodeinfo
> and most importantly
> perfquery -de
>
> for a failed node/port
This seems new in OFED 1.3:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ibcheckerrors
perfquery: iberror: failed: smp query nodeinfo: 2 ports; only 1
supported currently
Error check on lid 8 (svbu-qa-pcie-2 HCA-1) port all: FAILED
perfquery: iberror: failed: perfquery
Error check on lid 8 (svbu-qa-pcie-2 HCA-1) port 1
Jim,
Using netperf with TCP_STREAM and TCP_RR, I'm not seeing any changes in
SDP throughput or CPU utilization comparing OFED 1.3 beta and OFED
1.2.5. Looks like I need to set a non-zero value in
/sys/module/ib_sdp/sdp_zcopy_thresh? Do you plan to enable this by
default soon?
I tried "echo 4096
> How did you configure your servers to run Intel MPI with v2
> libraries?
I only installed the DAPL 2.0 libs.
Scott
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
I am using Intel MPI 3.1 build 26 with OFED 1.3 beta2 on RHEL4 x86_64.
Intel MPI works as before with dapl1, but I see very slow performance
with dapl2. Are there extra command-line params I need to use dapl2?
For example:
$ /data/software/qa/MPI/intel_mpi/intelmpi-3.1-`uname -m`/bin/mpiexec
-
I have added version 1.3beta2 to the OF Bugzilla.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tziporet
Koren
Sent: Thursday, Novem
I opened https://bugs.openfabrics.org//show_bug.cgi?id=756 for this
issue earlier today.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Woodruff, Robe
Done.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: Eli Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 2:00 AM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Subject: bugzilla ipoib bug
> >> 4. SDP - these are not yet in the alpha release
> >>o Keep-alive
> >>o Asynch IO
> >>o Send Zero Copy
> >>
> >
> > If it didn't make it into alpha, perhaps it should not go
> into 1.3, so
> > we can hold the release date better?
> >
> Since the code is running and tested a
> 3. IPoIB
>o Stateless offloads
>o NAPI is enabled default
How does one measure these changes using tools like netperf or iperf?
Do I need a specific HCA type?
> 4. SDP - these are not yet in the alpha release
>o Keep-alive
>o Asynch IO
>o Send Zero Copy
If it didn't make i
Vlad, I opened bug 740 for this, can you please fix?
Scott
From: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 11:10 PM
To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen); OpenFabricsEWG; Vladimir
Sokolovsky
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have added version 1.3alpha2 to bugzilla.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Tziporet Koren
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 7:31 AM
> T
I also don't see a way to use K_VER to compile for a kernel other than
the currently booted kernel, like I could in 1.2.5 and earlier.
Scott
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
I have changed the owner of the RDS component to Vlad.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Or Gerlitz
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 4:46
You are hitting https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651, which
was present in 1.2 and 1.2.5.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
If install.pl can do the same things install.sh can do, fine by me.
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Vladimir Sokolovsky
> Sent: Thursda
Cisco has been testing 1.2.c-10 IPoIB/SDP/MPI successfully on a 32-node
cluster. We are still working on tvflash, though.
Scott
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tziporet Koren
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 12:06 P
This allows me to REOPEN some RESOLVED LATER bugs from 1.2.
Scott
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
> > > I don't really think we want customers to run beta code
> >
> > What's the point of a beta then??
>
> Donnu.
> In previous OFED releases, we had "release candidates" rather
> than "beta".
> Openfabrics members were running RCs and reporting issues on
> the list and in
> bugzilla. Do you
> > So you need to be able to
> > tell the difference between a customer running libibverbs-1.0.4 from
> > OFED-1.3-beta1 and libibverbs-1.0.4 from OFED-1.3 final.
>
> I don't really think we want customers to run beta code, or
> intend to support
> such configurations.
But we still need to tell
> > Need to add mlx4 as a component too
>
> who has the permission to do so?
I can add it, who is the default owner for mlx4 bugs?
Scott
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
> It will be good if we can unify 1.2.c with 1.2.1 that was
> requested in
> the same time frame
> Any thoughts on this?
I am in favor of unifying them.
Scott
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
> I hope there will be some attempt to get these drivers merged
> upstream too.
How about SDP, are we ready to try to merge it upstream?
Scott
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
> My suggestion is that we keep the ofed_1_2 branch alive, thus
> new fixes
> should be applied to the repository.
> In this way we will be able to do a stable release when we decide.
> Another question is regarding the daily build - I don't think we need
> them any more. We can do a weekly buil
I have created 1.2rc5 in bugzilla.
Tziporet, I'm not sure how you created your "fixed in rc5" list, but
some of the bugs on it are still open (for example,
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577).
Scott Weitzenkamp
SQA and Release Manager
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco System
It's failing on any of the 2.6.9-*-0.*.EL errata kernels (for example
2.6.9-42.0.2.EL).
Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Tziporet Koren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 6:06 AM
> To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
> Cc: OpenFabrics EWG
>
Moni and Tziporet, can we get
https://bugs.openfabrics.org//show_bug.cgi?id=651 fixed yet for OFED 1.2
rc5? It's fixed for RHEL5 but not RHEL4.
Scott
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e
You missed the joke, it's *tvflash* not *tvflush*.
I have asked Roland about tvflash.
Scott
From: Tziporet Koren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:35 AM
To: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen); Tziporet Koren
I'm not touching tvflush! :-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tziporet
Koren
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:29 AM
To: Tziporet Koren; EWG; OpenFabrics General
Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] OFED tele
My suggestion wait only for Bonding and MPI fixes and have RC5 done on
Wed.
This RC5 should become the official release
[Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)] Sounds good to me.
Scott
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http
58 matches
Mail list logo
