On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 11:28 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> I see, next time, could you drop a mail saying that you decided to move
> on with something, etc?
>
Sure.
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Eli Cohen wrote:
Unfortunately not. But I did not want to leave this problem pending
anymore since I want to get some mileage on it. Still, if we have a
better solution it would be easy to adopt since this patch is
independent of all others.
I see, next time, could you drop a mail saying that
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 10:01 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> I see that you have merged the patch, so sorry, but I am not going to
> look on it. Have someone else reviewed it before the merge?
Unfortunately not. But I did not want to leave this problem pending
anymore since I want to get some mileage o
Eli Cohen wrote:
1 day is not enough time to review the patch, as of the importance, I
suggest you ask Roland and Alexey to review it and say what their
opinion on the solution, now once we all understand the problem.
I think I did ask, not explicitly but I guess it is understood that the
patch
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 18:10 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> 1 day is not enough time to review the patch, as of the importance, I
> suggest you ask Roland and Alexey to review it and say what their
> opinion on the solution, now once we all understand the problem.
>
I think I did ask, not explicitly
Eli Cohen wrote:
Good, so now we have some experience that it works and I don't see any
comments on the patch itself. Unless there are objections I will push
this to OFED as a backport for kernels <= 2.6.20.
Eli,
1 day is not enough time to review the patch, as of the importance, I
suggest yo
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 16:50 +0300, Ron Livne wrote:
> Hi,
> I tested it on red hat 5 and it's working.
>
Good, so now we have some experience that it works and I don't see any
comments on the patch itself. Unless there are objections I will push
this to OFED as a backport for kernels <= 2.6.20.
Hi,
I tested it on red hat 5 and it's working.
Ron
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Eli Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IB/ipoib: Fix neigh destructor oops
>
> For kernels 2.6.20 and older, it may happen that the pointer to
> ipoib_neigh_cleanup() is called after IPoIB has been unloades,
> c
IB/ipoib: Fix neigh destructor oops
For kernels 2.6.20 and older, it may happen that the pointer to
ipoib_neigh_cleanup() is called after IPoIB has been unloades,
causing a kernel oops. This problem has been fixed for 2.6.21 with
the following commit: ecbb416939da77c0d107409976499724baddce7b
The
