In the last EWG meeting, we discussed waiting a month or so and seeing what
kind of bugs
were reported against 1.4 to determine if a 1.4.1 release was needed.
From: general-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:general-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf
I understand but I think that this is another consideration that should be
factored in. Even if there are no "critical" PRs to fix, the introduction of
RHEL 5.3 (along with less critical PRs) may be enough justification.
I simply want to plant the seed in everyone's mind before our next meeting
Good point. Thanks for bringing it up and we can discuss it
at the next EWG meeting.
woody
-Original Message-
From: John Russo [mailto:john.ru...@qlogic.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:45 PM
To: Woodruff, Robert J; gene...@lists.openfabrics.org
Cc: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Su
I think releasing OMPI-1.3 with iWARP support is also good justification.
And there are RDS issues with ofed-1.4 even over IB that I think will
add to justification.
John Russo wrote:
I understand but I think that this is another consideration that should be factored in.
Even if there are
.
woody
-Original Message-
From: Steve Wise [mailto:sw...@opengridcomputing.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:46 PM
To: John Russo
Cc: Woodruff, Robert J; gene...@lists.openfabrics.org; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] RE: RHEL 5.3 and OFED 1.4.x
I think releasing OMPI-1.3
...@lists.openfabrics.org; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] RE: RHEL 5.3 and OFED 1.4.x
I think releasing OMPI-1.3 with iWARP support is also good justification.
And there are RDS issues with ofed-1.4 even over IB that I think will
add to justification.
John Russo wrote:
I
-Original Message-
From: Steve Wise [mailto:sw...@opengridcomputing.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:46 PM
To: John Russo
Cc: Woodruff, Robert J; gene...@lists.openfabrics.org; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] RE: RHEL 5.3 and OFED 1.4.x
I think releasing OMPI-1.3 with iWARP
...@lists.openfabrics.org; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] RE: RHEL 5.3 and OFED 1.4.x
Also, FWIW, it has been discussed (and agreed, I thought) to include
OMPI v1.3 in a 1.4.x release.
On Jan 22, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
>
> I understand the desire to not relea
Woodruff, Robert J wrote:
Personally I do not have a problem with including it, since MPI is
an isolated component and does not effect the core stack,
but I thought that we had discussed in Sonoma last year
not including major new features in point releases to
reduce the QA that is needed. And, i
-
> > From: Steve Wise [mailto:sw...@opengridcomputing.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:46 PM
> > To: John Russo
> > Cc: Woodruff, Robert J; gene...@lists.openfabrics.org;
> > ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
> > Subject: Re: [ewg] RE: RHEL 5.3 and OF
Doug Ledford wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 16:07 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
I understand the desire to not release new features in a point release,
but at the same time, these features are ready or near ready now. And
prior features have definitely been released in point releases.
(connectX
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 09:38 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
> Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 16:07 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
> >
> >> I understand the desire to not release new features in a point release,
> >> but at the same time, these features are ready or near ready now. And
> >>
Steve Wise wrote:
One way to alleviate this is to ship both 1.2.8 and 1.3 in ofed-1.4.1
and mark 1.3 as "experimental". Then remove 1.2.8 in ofed-1.5 and
make 1.3.x the production version for ofed-1.5.
I suggested this in the last conf call but folks didn't like the
thought of testing both
13 matches
Mail list logo
