Mobile devices...?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Curt Finley wrote:
> I wouldn’t think it would be a rule. One of the items lost was a
> message saved as a draft. Another person said they lost their whole
> calendar.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> lis
+1
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Adm wrote:
> Still see the gmail warning
>
>
> On Friday, June 21, 2013, Maglinger, Paul wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing if this comes through after removing the reference to their
>> mail server.
>>
>> -Paul
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Maglinger, Paul
If MS doesn't want that from it's employees why would they want it from
their MVPs?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:00 PM, James Hill wrote:
> Willingness to give an unbiased opinion especially when non favourable
> makes a far greater MVP in my opinion.
>
> James.
>
> -Original Message-
> Fro
How does your Exchange server know it is sending to someone who will read
it on a cell phone?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo wrote:
> I am trying to write a transport rule that will include our email
> disclaimer message for emails sent outside our org but not to cell phones.
>
I think it's called backup. It may involve the use of DAGs. I dunno...
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:39 PM, J- P wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Once again I called PSS only to have my case refunded, and no solution.
>
> After 5 days, and about 50 hours on the phone, PSS' only resolution was
> "create a new
Couldn't be Loster?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Jim Majorowicz wrote:
> F-.
>
> I mean really. Sending an unsubscribe for the admin list to one of the
> exchange lists? Total fail.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:37 AM, wrote:
>
>> Unsubscribe NTSysADM
>>
>
>
13 1:28 PM
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange]
>
> ** **
>
> Mmm, lobster...
>
>
>
>
> --
> Espi
>
>
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Jonathan Link
> wrote:
>
> Could
For what it's worth, I received your test sent on 1/21. Also on 1/21 there
were emails discussing Failover clusters, sent after your test message. I
don't recall seeing or deleting any messages on 1/22.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Eldridge, Dave wrote:
> Rod's usually pretty good about f
Well, I think you're trawling, not trolling... :D
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Adam Farage wrote:
> Completely understood :) I will troll through the Technet forums to see if
> I can get some inkling of what it could be.
>
> --
> From: mich...@smithcons.com
> To:
Well, yes. But his language suggested he was looking for something, not
wanting to create strife and discord.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Richard Stovall wrote:
> I think you're assuming he's not trolling...
>
> :)
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Jonat
I've seen some spoofed messages getting through our provider's barracuda.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:29 PM, xyz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We use MS hosted services on the front end and just finished FOPE to EOP
> conversion one week ago.
>
> Not a "big" uptick in user reports, but we do see Spam still ge
The irony is that Paul wouldn't know that he might've been unsubbed from
the NT list if it weren't for the inactivity of the Exchange list...
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> No, it’s moderately active.
>
>
>
> However, if it gets two bounces in a row, for whatever rea
12 matches
Mail list logo
