I have an issue with Exchange 2016 creating DAG databases. I create the
database on the first server, and mount it. The content index stays in the
failed mode for a little while, but then goes into a healthy state. I then tell
it to create a databasecopy to another DAG member. The database moun
-folder-is-automatically-added-to-your-office-365-mailbox
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 5:06 PM
To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
some odd reason, you really need to have a single
mailbox with more than 125 GB of data.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 5:06 PM
To:
mailboxes with a DPT of 180 day permanent delete.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:40 PM
To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [Ex
I know that with on premises exchange – a DPT or RPT tag will apply both to the
primary mailbox and to the archive. Is this true in a hybrid environment?
Here is my issue. I have number of mailboxes that are huge (think 100g+). We
wish to archive the contents of these mailboxes – to store like
known issues. And there may be some unknown issues as well.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:03 PM
To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
Subjec
To be really clear here – are this oddities of W2016 or Ex2016, even on W2012R2?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 4:15 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] Exchange 2016 on W
com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 5:11 PM
To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [Exchange] Exchange 2010 to 2016 on premise - Upgrade
Thanks – I picked up his book – and am looking at it now.
Two other
.I run it in production and it works
great. Best resource is to do the migration in a test lab...hands on is the
way I learn the best.
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:04 PM Stringham, Steven
mailto:sstring...@lrrc.com>> wrote:
We are presently on 2010. 600+ users. We are starting to look at 2016
We are presently on 2010. 600+ users. We are starting to look at 2016. So, a
couple of questions:
1) Is 2016 ready for prime time? Are there big gotchas to be worried about?
2) Reading list – best books/resources for study to prep for the upgrade.
Thanks
Steven Stringham
I have found that in cached mode I can do an advanced search using the field
level, and contains and find strings in the middle of a word or number – so
“uper” will find super, superman, supervisor, etc.
However, in online mode this search returns zero results.
Is this as expected? Am I missi
Exchange 2010 SP3 – from a merger. Recently upgraded from 2010 SP1 RU5.
The setting on maximum attachment size at one point on these mailbox was
unlimited. So, as I am looking at these mailboxes, there are some 500mb
attachments. I discovered this after the fact.
I moved a mailbox to another s
ck
> exe's, password protected zips and the usual suspect file types with it,
> that certainly helps.
>
>
>
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
> [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailt
Placement
Sure, you can do it. And with little impact.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 4:24 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com<mailto
Here is the current message flow:
Internet->Hosted AntiSpam Vendor (HAV)-> Ex2010 EdgeServer->HubTransport>MBX
MBX->HubTransport->Edge->HAV->Internet
I need to insert an appliance in this chain. I know I can stick it between the
Edge and HAV, but I would like it between Edge and HT. Specifical
placement - Exchange 2010
We use a hosted service, gateway appliance, and then Exchange aware AV software
on mailbox servers for outbreak mitigation only (no active scanning).
- Sean
On Apr 22, 2014, at 1:53 PM, "Stringham, Steven"
mailto:sstring...@lrrlaw.com>> wrote:
Antivi
Antivirus software and Exchange 2010 – where should I put it? I am looking at
this as a performance, security balancing act. So, my thoughts are where do
you folks put it. A little poll please…
AntiSpam outside service – before my internal systems see it.
Email AV gateway appliance
Rats, I thought someone would have some of these answers at least.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:11 AM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] Cross forest access with
Situation: Company A and Company B get merged becoming Company C. A/B both
have exchange worlds. We create a C AD domain, install exchange 2010, and put
contacts/mailbox links in A/B/C. Inbound now flows to C and then to either A or
B as needed. Trusts exist between the three AD domains.
Quest
sad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 4:07 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:exchange@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [Exchange] Mailbox locking up...
Environment - Ex2010 SP2 RU6.
From time to time
Environment - Ex2010 SP2 RU6.
>From time to time (once/twice a week) we have a mailbox (this is a moving
>target – not the same one) that decides to refuse all connection attempts.
>Everyone else in that database (and others) are able to connect to their
>mailbox. But, whichever is the lucky o
Different subnets?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]<mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]>
On Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:42 PM
To: exchange@lists.m
I have a DAG with multiple databases – three servers have copies of the
databases in two datacenters. I use snapshots on my SAN to backup the
databases. This moves the log files to a directory where they are purged later
– after many other backups. They all snap at about the same time. So, it
, what can you
see in the PF Admin Toolbox console?
And to the best of my knowledge and memory: no.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]<mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]>
On Behalf Of Strin
Stringham, Steven
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 8:25 PM
To: 'Exchange@lists.myITforum.com'
Subject: [Exchange]
Unsubscribe exchange
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are address
Unsubscribe exchange
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for de
o:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]>
On Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 4:05 PM
To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [Exchange] RE: Removing PF database from ex2007 server
I have already removed the CAS and Transport roles from the server. I am trying
to remov
I am trying to retire a 2007 server .But, it keeps telling me that I have
public folders in the PF database. I have run a command to list all the PFs on
that server. I can’t seem to find any more active PFs. It still tells me that
it cannot remove the PF database.
Get-PublicFolder -server ex2
from ex2007 server
What do you see in the PF Admin Toolkit app?
What, exactly, is the error you get?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]<mailto:[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]>
On Behalf Of Stringh
Smith
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:07 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: GAL contact - problem with calendaring
You shouldn't lose anything.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stringh
: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: GAL contact - problem with calendaring
Huh. Interesting.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:56 PM
To: exchange@lists.myi
.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 5:11 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: GAL contact - problem with calendaring
The other org is at AD 2008, not 2012.
Are you suggesting that there is a problem w
: [Exchange] RE: GAL contact - problem with calendaring
Then prep for 2008.
I'm suggesting I can't imagine what else it would be.
Although I would probably federate.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stringh
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 4:49 PM
To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [Exchange] RE: GAL contact - problem with calendaring
Nope - we just added contacts to a new OU
calendaring
Did you federate?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff601760(v=exchg.141).aspx
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 3:51 PM
To: exchange
We are working on combining with another law firm. In this process we have
created contacts in both of our Ex2010 (sp2Ru6) environments of the users on
both sides. They are AD 2008 and we are still on AD 2003.
If I have a contact for them in my GAL:
* When I send them a calendar invite, they ope
Expand please on what you are thinking with the Exchange DAGs item.
One of the things we will be going through here very soon (within a couple of
weeks) is using a new domain name (u...@myold.com and t...@theirold.com becomes
m...@newcorp.com and t...@newcorp.com) that will need to split between
We are building a brand new domain for our combined company. I am wondering
what the recommended best practice are for naming the new AD domain.
Suggested:
1) mydom.local
2) ??.mydom.com
3) mydom.com
I have seen all three. If you were to do it fresh, what would you recommend?
___
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] iPad 6.1 bit me good - help?
Old iOS issue.
All iOS users should be at 6.1.3 or 6.1.4.
We block 6.1 using out Cutrix/Zenprise mdm software.
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013, Stringham, Steven wrote:
I have a user with an iPad running IOS 6.1. She
, 2013 3:21 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] iPad 6.1 bit me good - help?
Why cant you just delete them from the users Calender? Changing the view to
List mode should make this tedious task doable.
--
Espi
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Stringham, Steven
mailto:sstri
I have a user with an iPad running IOS 6.1. She managed to ok 4 entries last
night in her calendar. This set off the repeat trick for these 4 entries. I now
have 8700+ calendar items that I need to kill. Unfortunately one of these was
one with 41mb of attachments - so her mailbox grew by 90g be
:49 AM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: Exchange 2010 - two datacenters - # of dags
Depends entirely on configuration.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 7:51 PM
To
that MBX be able to fail over to the secondary
datacenter with little to no admin action, and with little to no user outages?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Stringham, Steven
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 4
We are redoing our SAN and Exchange (business merger stuff). The connection
between the primary and secondary datacenter is 200mb at about 35ms. We are
looking at about 8tb of exchange data right now. I am presently using 2 copies
of the DAG at the primary and 1 at the old secondary datacente
44 matches
Mail list logo