I upgraded to Exchange 2013 CU15 today and put NET 4.6.2 on after.
Everything is good.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> Sorry. can be difficult to keep up with what is what these days.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.c
I would go with the second one. That way it's fully automated and just
relies on the delagate to make approvals. For instance if someone cancels
the meeting, the attendant will take care of removing it from the room
calendar. Make sure your permissions don't allow anyone to edit the
calendar dire
re a PostmasterAddress that is part
> of Set-TransportConfig? That's my best guess...
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 7, 2015 11:43 AM
> *To:* exchange
>
essage?
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Friday, March 6, 2015 1:42 PM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* [Exchange] System email "from" blank
>
>
>
> I'm sending in
I'm sending incident reports to users when certain messages are blocked.
The reports are coming from "Microsoft Outlook", which is visible as the
sender, but the "from" field is blank when looking at the email in the
list. Anyone know where I could go in Exchange and set this sender's
display name
Yes, I left out the AutoDiscoverInternalUri piece and it's defiantly
important, and we set that up as well, of course.
On Feb 25, 2015 11:36 PM, "Adam Farage" wrote:
> The description below is a right but missing a key point.
>
> In the event the client is domain joined (client being a computer r
It is very incorrect that Outlook doesn't update when there is a CAS server
migration, as long as Autodiscover is working properly in the domain.
The best way we setup Autodiscover was as an alias that resolved to the IP
address of an Exchange aware Load Balancer. With EX2010, you can use the
fre
department now that we have the process
> down but like you said in the ECP I can not access DG's only users.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Friday, February 20, 2015 10:50 AM
20, 2015 at 10:18 AM, David McSpadden wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> Dumber question googlefu should find a PS for this, you think?
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Friday, February 20,
You have to write the rule using powershell and just put in the DG's email
address. You can't pick a DG from ECP for some dumb, dumb reason.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:28 AM, David McSpadden wrote:
> Is there a way to get a transport rule to send to a DG instead of an
> individual mailbox in Ex
What load balancer are you using? Any load balancer worth its salt will
let you easily setup a 302 redirect. We use inexpensive Kemp LoadMasters
and it's a drop-down option, then you just put in the URL you want to
redirect to. We can put unlimited amount of redirects to the "real"
URL/server far
the Connection Time-Out (seconds) to 300
5. Click OK
6. Do an IISReset
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 5:02 AM, ccollins9 wrote:
> We also recently migrated to EX2013 and have Kemp LoadBlancers in front of
> the CAS servers. We had several issues with iPhones including sporadic pus
We also recently migrated to EX2013 and have Kemp LoadBlancers in front of
the CAS servers. We had several issues with iPhones including sporadic push
email failures and battery drain. There were a few things we had to setup
on the Kemp and in IIS to iron them all out.
One was Idle Connection Time
of it a couple of times.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Friday, December 19, 2014 2:02 AM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] EX2013 rollup 7 install error
>
>
>
>
MU or WSUS rather than elevated command line?
>
>
> On 12/18/2014 10:45 PM, ccollins9 wrote:
>
>> "A quick suggestion for you; write a PowerShell script that monitors and
>> watches those services; if they don’t restart, then the script will
>> auto-start the
tors and
> watches those services; if they don’t restart, then the script will
> auto-start them; have the script run as a scheduled task like every day or
> so; depending how crazy the update retrieval process is.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> lis
server that never had this problem, you were dang lucky.
>
> On a scale of .NET barfages, SharePoint blowups, it's lower down the list,
> but I can show you every Exchange update, someone hiccups right at the end
> and if it does, the services do not get reenabled.
>
> On 12/18/
yes you probably have that update.
>
> Because the patching process as noted stops the services if there is any
> hiccup at the end of the process, you may find the services not turned back
> on again.
>
> Rule of patching Exchange/ check for running services.
> Rule of patchin
us employed. End rant!
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:46 PM, ccollins9 wrote:
>
> Already tried that. Same result. Thinking of running powershell to set
all disabled services back to auto, rebooting, then running setup again.
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
t; *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2014 9:42 PM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* [Exchange] EX2013 rollup 7 install error
>
>
>
> I think ive seen this before on previous rollups,
I think ive seen this before on previous rollups, but I can't recall the
fix. Getting the following error when updating a server with just MBX
role. The CAS role server updated fine. There are two other EX2013
servers in the domain, one just a CAS and one just an MBX, so 4 total
servers
[12/19/
issued:
>
>
>
>
>
> So in this case, the name of the cert is the external host and therefor
> doesn't work for the internal network.
>
>
>
> What am I doing wrong here?
>
>
>
> *Gavin Wilby*
>
> *IT Support Engineer*
>
>
>
> *F
te:
> This is MY OPINION. I personally think the storage and search
> capabilities of Exchange for *discovery* are underdeveloped. Exchange
> eDiscovery is an 80% solution.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On
rd party solutions.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 6:30 PM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* [Exchange] Jounaling
>
>
>
> We are embarking on a "
We are embarking on a "journal everything" adventure and I was wondering
who out there has been doing this in a medium to large organization and the
resources or strategies you employed. I couldn't imagine sending
everything to a single journal mailbox due to database load and size etc.
So I was t
experience.
>
>
>
> Thanks for some input,
>
> Alice
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Monday, November 10, 2014 9:53 PM
>
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* RE: [Exchang
ts going to be the easiest way to achieve this? Can I not simply get
> outlook to ignore the certificate, or is this a massive no no?
>
>
>
> *Gavin Wilby*
>
> *IT Support Engineer*
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *O
Once you have it figured out where you will be getting the cert, be sure to
issue a SAN cert with both the internal and external website names. SAN
certs allow multiple DNS names on a single cert. The certificate request
wizard in exchange will generate a cert request with multiple names by
default
Some phones do actually support active sync policies, included requiring a
password. But like all things Android, it's the same answer of "it depends"
On Nov 10, 2014 6:37 AM, "Damien Solodow"
wrote:
> No.
> On Nov 9, 2014 7:17 PM, David McSpadden wrote:
> Can you set a password pattern polic
gt; What are you backing up to? We still use Tapes and Veeam could not attach
> to the physical tape drives. So we are still on BE and looking for
> something to replace it with. Commvault is too expensive, and not sure
> where else to look.
>
>
>
> Alice
>
>
>
&g
ists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 5:18 PM
> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> Subject: Re: [Exchange] Autoresponder for Customer Service
>
> Yes, the second option is smarter.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:34 PM, ccollins9
Thursday, November 6, 2014 5:13 PM
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>
> Excellent - this works.
>
> Learn something new every day...
>
> Kurt
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:52 PM, ccollins9 wrote:
> > Actually, there is a way to create the rule in Outlook AND not have to
haven't seen that update yet. Need to go find it. I
> still run BE for a few physical machines since Veeam is only virtual.
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:35 PM, ccollins9 wrote:
>
>> We replaced Backup Exec with Veeam a few years ago and love it. Haven't
>>
We replaced Backup Exec with Veeam a few years ago and love it. Haven't
regretted it one bit and we especially like the direct SAN integration.
Restores for AD and SQL were really funky where you needed to bring up a
"virtual lab", but they changed and improved that in version 8 that was
just relea
.com
> > To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> >
> > Oh, wait...
> >
> > OoO only responds once per customer during the period while it's
> > configured. We'd have to turn if off and on again on a regular basis
> > (daily, weekly), and that&#x
You can do some of this with Exchange, but I'm not sure you can do all of
it, particularly the part about moving a rejected message to a quarantine
folder. For instance, with Exchange 2013 (maybe with 2010, but I'm not on
2010 to test) you can create a single transport rule that will forward any
me
)
>
> 317.447.6014 (fax)
>
> HARRISON COLLEGE
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 5, 2014 1:39 PM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Autoresponder for Custome
The best thing you could do, if able, would be to get a ticketing system
that "checks" the inbox of a designated account and generate tickets based
on email sitting in there, then it will auto-reply to those messages
explaining a ticket was created and generate an ID for the user.
Footprints and Tr
Yes, there are ActiveSync events that will be logged in the server. Tehy
have their own category and should be easy to find. Another main way to
look at activity is to look at IIS logs.
http://msexchangeguru.com/2012/02/01/exchange-activesync/
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:13 PM, David Mazzaccaro
Yeah, that's what it's called, I knew you could do it.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> This is the use case for the alternate witness server.
You are correct in terms of quorum. With your scenario of 4 servers in a
single DAG, a witness server is required. Even if you place the witness in
Site B, and Site B gets isolated from the rest of the sites, Site B would
only have 2 votes out of the necessary 3 needed to establish quorum. This
d
at 4:40 AM, ccollins9 wrote:
> Looking to see if anyone might have a solution to this
>
> Let me start by saying, my goal is NOT to export an Online Archive Mailbox
> as a PST. Our desire is to block PST by policy, without exception
>
> Currently, when a user leaves we export t
Looking to see if anyone might have a solution to this
Let me start by saying, my goal is NOT to export an Online Archive Mailbox
as a PST. Our desire is to block PST by policy, without exception
Currently, when a user leaves we export their mailbox to PST and map that
file to their manager's Ou
We use org/distList. It wrecks scripts sometimes when you don't account
properly for the "/", but it has been here forever. So for example, if
company name is Aggravated User Inc, all list names would be AUI/Marketing,
etc.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Daniel Chenault wrote:
> I inherited t
This is our same setup. We are currently in production with Exchange
2013/Kemp and it is working very well so far. EX2013 technology changes
make it VERY friendly to load balancers now. We are now
planning/testing/building out a new DR site. We haven't officially tested
this yet, but I know it wil
People are likely going to the other server due to Autodiscover, which
updates automatically in AD when you install the CAS role on the server.
You need to have everyone in the org use a DNS alias for autodiscover.
Autodiscover needs to point to either a single CAS or a CAS Array that is
represen
Sorry! missed your email, i see it now.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> Yep. That was my point. :-)
>
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> --
> From: ccollins9
> Sent: 9/4/2014 7:40 PM
>
> To: exchange
> S
Got ya. But it still needs to be set to anonymous, no?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> This is way SBS does things.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ------
> From: ccollins9
> Sent: 9/4/2014 7:10 PM
> To: exchange
>
U, is it me or are none of these connectors are set to receive from 0.0.0.0
- 255.255.255.255? Going to be hard to receive email from the internet if
all your connectors can only receive from a 192.168 address, no? You need
to set a receive connector to ip range 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 AND
pe
> *VSP4, VTSP4*
>
> *[image: MCP_SE_c] [image: MCTS] *[image: top_banner]
>
>
>
> *[image: VMLOGO_VTSP_S_Q208] [image: sales_prof_B]*
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
&
I didn't accuse you, John, I just said that with the title you have, it
could be embarrassing to admit to using that site (which you did admit to,
sorry, but that's just a fact here). I wasn't passing judgement, I was
just trying to give a real-world example of why people shouldn't use those
sites
Just FYI because many people don't realize this who aren't involved often
in the world of IT certification:
Pass4Sure is a BRAINDUMP site. Braindump sites are cheating because they
use real questions/answers and you COULD have your certification revoked by
Microsoft. See MS blog link below.
Joh
Long ago I took an Exchange 2010 class and learned that I could create a
custom folder that would show up in everyone's Outlook client along side
their mailbox. Was this feature called "Managed Folders"? I want to do
something like this in EX2013, but it's been depreciated. Does anyone have
a goo
My organization upgraded to Exchange 2013 and we are using the built-in
Malware protection. So far, so good. We've tested it and it works. We are
comfortable with the built-in solution because we have a layered defense.
In addition to EX2013's built-in AV scanning, we also have email scanning
capa
In my own personal experience, I have run two McAfee products on Exchange
2010 servers:
1. Standard McAfee Virus Scan Enterprise
2. McAfee Security for Microsoft Exchange 8
*McAfee Virus Scan Enterprise*
This is the normal McAfee virus scan that many servers and workstations run
to do basic virus
"Yes, and judging by your question, I guess it should not be checked?"
No, it should be checked. I could see if VSS wasn't being used that a
backup could mess with the database somehow
On Jun 14, 2014 7:29 PM, "J- P" wrote:
> Yes, and judging by your question, I guess it should not be checked?
>
Do you have the full database with VSS option checked?
On Jun 14, 2014 5:14 PM, "J- P" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an ex2013 , running on 2012hyper-v guest, after the backup of the
> databse completes, email stops working for some minutes, then this error is
> logged
>
> the copy of database 'DB_
Are all your hub transport servers functioning properly? Before delivering
a message, it goes through shadow redundancy, could be getting hung up
there. Have you looked at your Queue Viewer app to see if there are
messages queuing
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:19 AM, J- P wrote:
> Hit send to q
the latter.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
> Curt
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Friday, May 30, 2014 3:05 PM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange]
Yes, I was able to follow your instructions and set this up. Not sure if it
matters, but are an on-premise EX2013/EX2010 hybrid shop right now. But
everything I did, I did it on the EX2013 side. Also, I didn't have to do
step 2 as I logged into a VM as user U and setup the mail profile with
Outloo
Yeah I'm with Geoffrey on this---not seeing the need in the need to involve
an Exchange server at all if you are "working with" a PST. Just mount it
using Outlook and be done with itright? The PST would reside on a
network share (not recommended) or on your local hard drive, and doesn't
count
47.6033 (office)
>
> 317.447.6014 (fax)
>
> HARRISON COLLEGE
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 21, 2014 2:47 PM
>
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange
7.6014 (fax)
>
> HARRISON COLLEGE
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 21, 2014 2:38 PM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Phantom ActiveSync devices
>
&g
I know this has to do with remote wiping, but it may apply to your case
http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-2010-error-activesyncdevice-cannot-be-found-remote-wipe/
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:37 PM, ccollins9 wrote:
> Wow, never heard of that one! Could they be devices that were used
Wow, never heard of that one! Could they be devices that were used by that
user at one time but have since been assigned to another user? Would be
hard to determine because EMS only spits out the two correct devices and
ECP won't let you click it to get the DeviceID to run a query with. Do any
d
"I wonder if mail tips counts the actual distribution list as a recipient
along with all the members."
That's actually very possible. Dist lists are recipient objects, so it
would "make sense" even thos it doesn't really make sense
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Steve Norton wrote:
> I won
invite.
> I'm sensing this is not possible. :)
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:27 PM, ccollins9 wrote:
>
>> To my knowledge (someone may know differently), not if you want the
>> assistant to be able to edit the calendar items (like if a meeting time has
>> to be
To my knowledge (someone may know differently), not if you want the
assistant to be able to edit the calendar items (like if a meeting time has
to be changed). That's the rub with delegated access. If you trust someone
enough to create and edit your calendar items, then you would need to trust
the
so it's not in the COO INBOX, not mailbox
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:05 PM, ccollins9 wrote:
> Most anything is possible with rules. But yeah, forwarded to WHO?
> Himself? I think for that to happen, the admin assistant would have to be
> adding the COO as a meeting particip
Most anything is possible with rules. But yeah, forwarded to WHO?
Himself? I think for that to happen, the admin assistant would have to be
adding the COO as a meeting participant. If that's the case, then either
tell the admin assistant to stop doing that, or create a rule to dump the
forwards
I currently work for "the man" but often ruminate on going independent. Do
any of you have some good resources I could check out for prepping for a
transition like this? I'm the "i don't know where to start" guy. In all
of the places I have worked, I quickly rise to the top of the heap and
becom
ly to Apple devices.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:30 PM, ccollins9 wrote:
> Has anyone out there gotten iPad's to work in EX2013 with Client-based
> certificate authentication? It works fine in EX2010, but I can't get it
> going in EX2013 with the same cert and settings for some reason.
>
Has anyone out there gotten iPad's to work in EX2013 with Client-based
certificate authentication? It works fine in EX2010, but I can't get it
going in EX2013 with the same cert and settings for some reason.
>
> iPad*§*ApplDQTFNEQHDFHW
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Monday, May 12, 2014 11:38 AM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] RE: Active Sync and passwords.
| %{Set-CASMailbox -Identity $_.smtpaddress -ActiveSyncEnabled $true}
something like this.
This will not accomplish his goal. This command would just simply allow
that user's account to interface with ActiveSync devices (which I am
presuming is already set on all his user's mailbox accounts). It
You can mount both mailboxes in outlook and use outlook to both export the
calendar to pst then import from that pst to the departmental calendar. In
the wizard you can select just the calendar item
On May 9, 2014 8:16 PM, "xyz" wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Exchange 2010 SP3 U3
>
> Outlook 2013
>
>
>
forum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on
> behalf of ccollins9 [ccolli...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 12:34 PM
> To: exchange
> Subject: Re: [Exchange] CAS exposure - Exchange 2013 SP1
>
> Yes, EX2013 supports client certs and we have them turned on and working.
>
Yes, EX2013 supports client certs and we have them turned on and working.
The issue with reverse proxy from the load balancers, it needs to decrypt
the packet at the LB to read the header to know where to send the
connection (owa vs. ActiveSync, vs. EWS, etc.), and for that it would need
to suppor
anks.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Friday, May 09, 2014 8:34 AM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] CAS exposure - Exchange 2013 SP1
>
>
>
> With EX2013 CAS, a
e, but I'm just interested in knowing the "why"?) J
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Friday, May 9, 2014 11:36 AM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] CAS e
Another thought, I know EX2010 had issues when the CAS server was in one AD
site and the mailbox was in another AD site. It would try to proxy you to
a CAS in the site where the mailbox resided. I think they may have changed
that in EX2013, not sure.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:33 AM, ccollins9
With EX2013 CAS, all client connectivity is over port 443, so that's nice
because there is no need to open RPC, etc., all which I'm sure you know. I
would leave the CAS in the internal network and just open port 443 to it.
There is no real security threat unless MS has unpatched vulnerabilities
in
You can test exactly what happens so it's a little less of a mystery. You
can apply your policy to only a few devices and see what happens. My motto
at work is--have you tested? Yes. Ok, test it again.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Kennedy, Jim
wrote:
> Absolutely. Don't like you are free to
*Subject:* RE: [Exchange] OWA Cannot download attachments - This content
> is blocked
>
>
>
> Sorry--I didn't mention this is two servers in a DAG, all roles, with
> Barracuda hardware LBs in front.
>
>
>
> I hadn't checked that--can see her mailbox database i
a librarian, so pretty busy during the school day, and the
> workstation is also used for checking out books (hence the OWA logon as she
> needs it).
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *ccollins9
&
Didn't Microsoft discontinue the TMG product? You may want to think about
using some kind of virtualized proxy/frontend devices that can run as VMs
in VMware or HyperV. I think F5 makes some.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Orlebeck, Geoffrey <
geoffrey.orleb...@chomp.org> wrote:
> I'm not su
SAN/UC certs are really the only way to go and is recommended by Microsoft
for Exchange. Often the price increases with the number of domains/server
names you add into the cert.
Are internal certs an option? We use an internal MS PKI and issue SAN
certs to our servers that can have any and all n
Are your test account and the user account on the same mailbox server and
database? Just for S&G, have you tried temporarily disabling the built-in
Exchange malware detection and tried it? This is a per-server setting on
Mailbox servers.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Miller Bonnie L. <
mille
88 matches
Mail list logo
