(Yelling)
Don, that's PF's, not PD's. Can't you get the two straight! Don't you know
how to use your keyboard by now?
(/Yelling)
Of couse, I'm just kidding Don, just wanted to try and lighten things up.
Wouldn't want to offend anyone on this list, especially since MEC is coming
up - I don't
That's not Westlake is it?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 09:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: body type
Rich,
In exch admin go to user mailbox select clean mailbox, under custom message
type enter OOFRULES (be aware that this will delete all rules for this
user), works 95% of the time. Renter OOO and it should work.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have
Hi, Tim!
Are you trying to do a BLB? [1] If yes, please read these:
http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm
[1] BLB = Brick Level Backup [2]
[2] AKA Mailbox-level backup
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new
We use the AutoAccept script at www.exchangecode.com. Works like a champ,
and allows us to set the calendar permissions for the conference rooms to
read only for users.
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Curry, Kristin
How many people have the ability to this?
Why not just ask who did it?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Creation/Deletion
We have a user who lost all of the
I'm 99% sure who did it, but they won't admit to it. I need proof.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox Creation/Deletion
How many people have the ability to this?
Why not
Meanwhile, are you restoring from backup?
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Cooking lesson #1: Don't fry bacon in
thank you, Ma'am.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Why is abbreviation such a long word?
Also, make sure that nobody is writing code that connects to your Exchange
Server for sending emails. Their process may be trying to login with wrong
credentials.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:05 PM
To: Exchange
Sorry, I glanced at your name and thought it said Michael.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox Creation/Deletion
thank you, Ma'am.
-Michèle
Immigration site:
That's ok, Roberta. Happens alot, actually.
*grin*
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
No one is listening until you
What version of Veritas might this be? I use BE and I didn't have to do
this for my Exchange backups. I have to do this for SQL because the DBAs
want to get an e-mail every time a backup runs, but that was just a nice to
have, not a requirement.
If, however, you are trying to do BLBs as
Perzactly - a process rather than a person is doing it.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log
Also, make sure that nobody is writing code that connects
You would have proof if the Diagnostics Logging for Security is set to
maximum on your Directory Service on all of your Exchange Servers. The
following article describes in detail how you can determine which Exchange
Server the change was made at and details on setting up diagnostics logging.
every list needs its comic relief :-)
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
I'm really easy to get along with once
Apparently not. Also, I've never seen the format domain\userid\alias
anywhere. I guess Tom was trying to say domain\alias and password?
Adil, make sure that the associated windows nt account in the mailbox
properties reflects the name change. If it does, try removing the NT
account, replicate
Aaah. I see. What is your site topology like? Do you schedule the DR for
off-hours? If so, you may reduce some of these complaints by restructuring
the DR schedules. For example, if you have a hub-spoke topology you can
schedule the DR so that the hub site requests updates first and after
Well, if everybody uses the same account, you obviously can't trace who did
what? That's why we lock up all of our server accounts away in a very
secure place with only two top level admins have access to it. Everybody
does their administration with their own ids.
S
-Original Message-
Apparently not. Also, I've never seen the format domain\userid\alias
anywhere. I guess Tom was trying to say domain\alias and password?
No, he wasn't.
*
Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.
The Hex Number explanation is extremely helpful. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox Creation/Deletion
Have the logging level for the Directory Access object of
Your never having seen the format domain\userid\alias doesn't invalidate
it. Please test yourself. Make a userid of JDOE with an alias of
JohnDoe.
Since my assessment of Adil's linguistic heritage is being requested, I
must admit that my wild guess is that his first language is Urdu. And I
Two have announced retirements, one of them yesterday!
Drew (MOS)
KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp
Pics of Max are BACK!
I am having a weird problem occur. For certain users, they can longer
query the Global Address List yet still authenticate with no problem to
the mail server. Other users are still able to access the Global
Address List. I have even tried completely reinstalling the users PC,
and am still
Cmon Ed, you know reading between the lines is REQUIRED reading for MS
products
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: August 23, 2001 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 databases
That's REALLY
What?!?!
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem after move to Exchange 2000, please help
The MEC is coming up and I heard that some people are going just to
The two hour thing applies to Exchange 5.5 and NT permissions on mailboxes,
etc., not to public folder or mailbox folder client permissions.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I believe it would be naiive to assume that all tacos served in Mexico
conform to some technical standard.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
It could be accurately labeled a scam if the only way to obtain such a
feature is to sign a contract with MCS. I'm not saying that's the case, but
if it were it might be considered a scam.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.
What is a standard?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fish Tacos
I believe it would be naiive to assume that all tacos served in Mexico
conform to some technical standard.
Ed
You mean when she's almost 9 months pregnant? Thats not safe. Most doctors
don't allow air travel after the 2nd trimester.
You could bring your wife ...
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Choi Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August
Check your recipient policy.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
What kind of recommendations do you expect? You already bought it!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson
Sent: Thursday,
The thread from 7.25.2001, titled The Last Few Days... Assault
rob, actually.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:39 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Problem after move to Exchange 2000, please
look, if she goes into labour at the keynote session, just tell her to keep
taking notes, and you'll handle the rest...
hey, I'm in Chicago too!
Drew (MOS)
KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
People here tend to be hostile when they perceive a poster to be both
clueless and argumentative. The original owner of this list used to call it
arrogant ignorance. Go back and read your own posts with an open mind and
maybe you'll understand what I'm telling you. Then answer the questions
Run the performance optimizer. Is anything set to A:? Do you have anything
else running on this server, like a virus scanner?
Aside: My late mother used to work at the Santa Maria Gottschalk's store.
My wife (unfortunately) owns GOT stock.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq
Congrats MAn
-Original Message-
From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
*sigh*
I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is due with our 2nd
baby the first week of October.
After changing a remote IMS from send only Inbound to send Outbound Only
then back to Inbound only mode, many messages (3000) were sent from as far
back as 1999. If the IMS is set to inbound only, would it not send
undeliverables for refused connections or would it just queue the message?
It
OH YEAH!!! You wanna make something of it?!?!?!?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files
Shut up all of you or I'm going to come
I am using A dial-up connection in Exchange 5.5, but I want to use a new
line thru my firewall on another Machine.
What setting do I have to change to Do this?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Is there anyway to catch undeliverable messages where the user does not have
an email address setup on the system and forward to someone.
This option was in Exchange 5.5 but i can't seem to find it anywhere in
2000!
Kind Regards,
Chris Bond
Iam running Exhcange Server 5.5 SP4 on NT 4.0 with SP6a.. Iam also running
IIS with Proxy as a firewall. Iam trying to stop mail relaying. The
problem I encounter is when I open Exchange administrator and the open IMC
I recieve the following error Extension SMTP could not be loaded. The
specified
Exchange Discussion List:
Hi all. I've been off the list for over a year now (like anyone
remembers me ;-)) and I've recently converted the Netware network I've
been managing to all Windows 2000/Active Directory... I used the
Services for Netware migration to assist in the process. The domain
Also, I've never seen the format domain\userid\alias
anywhere. I guess Tom was trying to say domain\alias and password?
Can you say OWA?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 7:52 AM
To:
I remember back in my earlier days asking if there was an Exch group.
People would say well there the Swynk one, but those people are mean
and will tear you up
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Thursday, August 23,
::jumps through monitor and strangles Don over the Internet::
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files
OH YEAH!!! You wanna make something of it?!?!?!?
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_smtp.htm
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
For every action, there is an equal
Yeah, you'd like to think so... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files
::jumps through monitor and strangles Don over the
::adjusts settings on webcam::
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
if you continue in your misguided attempt to
I think I still remember seeing that post and laughing my a$$ off...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files
I remember back
That explains your lack of a$$
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files
I think I still remember seeing that post and laughing my a$$ off...
-Original
What I lack in the back end I make up for in the front end. ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
William
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files
That explains your
Jennifer, please read the list! This is discussed every so often! Setting
an IMS to Inbound Only in Exchange 5.5 and earlier will not keep the MTAs
from routing outbound SMTP mail to the IMS server. The way to keep that
from happening is to change the Address Space so that it has but one entry
Was there a question here? ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IIS relay secure?
On the Spam-L, we were discussing how to make Exchange 5.5
*sigh* Talk to my agent
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Flutists and harpists have bad attitudes from all the
*sigh* Is IIS relay secure? If not, how to make it so?
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Flutists and harpists
I re-ran the performance optimizer and nothing is set to a:. It does have
ScanMail running on the server and IIS. Someone else suggested a Q article
for IIS, so I'll look at that.
My apologies to the wife.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
That's why I stated similar.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Store.exe error
But he said it was store.exe, and that isn't IIS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
ps. Q230235
I've never used IIS SMTP can't test it - does anybody know if this is what
I want? :-)
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
Yep, that one should do the trick.
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS relay secure?
ps. Q230235
I've never used IIS SMTP can't
Like you can't imagine.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
That must have hurt.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
within IIS Smtp you can configure it to only accept requests from specific
domains or Ip adresses. You can alos require authentication for smtp to
realy. It is highly configurable on these matters. If you need your web
server to send mail from your web site, you could configure smtp on each
box,
I don't know why you would want to do without it... it's easy enough to
configure, it has the patented Ronco Set it and forget it! feature set,
and achieves the functionality that you want. I've been running it for a
couple of years here, with very few problems. Many others on the list (with
a
who do you think her agent is?
Drew (MOS)
KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp
Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net
After my experience, I would agree that that is true for some of the
participants.
ve
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sharing contact files
I remember back in my
Ah don't worry - Someone one told me
that two was 10 times harder than one
They we lying to me.
its 100 times harder!
-Original Message-
From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
Ahh.. such
I understand that the IMS was setup incorrectly in
this remote site. My dilemma is that 3000 messages (some 3 years old, some 5 months
old) have
apparently been sent after configuring the IMS correctly, (all sent
outbound.)
If this is true:
Setting an IMS to Inbound Only in Exchange 5.5 and
yes but the rewards...would you give them up?
-Original Message-
From: Neubauer, Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
Ah don't worry - Someone one told me
that two was 10 times harder
Vicki? Does it work now?? Update us, please!
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Nice doggie. - Famous Last Words
Ok, done...but still no mailboxes show up in exmerge.
Reason?: I do not think the old mailbox is deleted, or effected...so I think
the message I sent went to the original mailbox. Possible?
When doing this, once I get the PST, should I delete the original
mailbox..THEN create a new one on the
*And*, it's available! (for now)
:)
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: oh, man what a mess
LOL!! Now that's a great domain name! ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Thanks, but that didn't seem to do it. Any other suggestions?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Address list problems ...
Not sure if this is the solution. But have seen
If you connect to the new mailbox, does the mail you sent it show up??
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 03:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge - Copying PST to Mailbox
Ok, done...but still no mailboxes show up
are we talking E2k or 5.5? are all the clients Outlook 2k?
-Original Message-
From: Trey F. Henefield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Address list problems ...
Thanks, but that didn't seem to do it. Any other
Every once in a while I've had to open up the conference room mail box with
the /cleanfreebusy switch. It usually cures similar problems. On one very
rare occasion, I had to completely remove and reinstall the Autoaccept
script-- I forget the details on why, though. It might have been around the
We are referring only to Exchange 2000 server. The clients are Outlook
2000 and 2002. I have recently applied all current patches to the
Exchange server, which I think started the problem. This one server is
dedicated for all of the server functions (e.g. PDC, DNS server, Global
Catalog
We have run /cleanfreebusy on this room almost every day since Feb. and it
hasn't fixed it. Nothing else has changed and all the rooms are configured
the same on this one server. Anything else anyone can think of
Diane
Diane Boehm
SC Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.262.260.5330
There are
So when you go into ESM Org Recipients and start right-clicking and
looking at security settings, what groups can read, whether the security
perms inherit or not, do you have any insights? Pretend it's a file
they can't see on an NTFS volume somewhere, troubleshoot just like that.
Group
Next thing I think I'd do is remove and reinstall the script from that one
conference room. It only takes a minute, and may clear it up.
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Would that be OOD? Out of Doghouse?
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Apologies
While it's safe to assume that dogs are trainable, network admins aren't so
neatly categorized.
This is why its getting weird, cause I have checked the permissions also
as specified in article id: q274668. Everything is set fine.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Address
I know that, but I am not in charge of clients or training. This has been a
pet peeve of mine for over a year, but no one will touch it until we can
prove that the script isn't causing all the problems. And why would this
affect only this one room and not the other 49? I know users who look at
If it helps, this is exactly what happened to one of my conference rooms.
For some reason, it was the only one not accepting meetings. I reinstalled
the script on it and it started working. I had another one that I had to
completely delete the mailbox and re-create it and then install the
The place that it is wrong is when I open this room from the server
Can you expand how you open it from the server? OWA? A MAPI Outlook
(97/98/2000/2002) client?
Are you running Exchange 5.5 Server with SP4? If so, did you apply the
lasted postSP4 hotfixes (especially the one for CDO 1.21)?
The MTA is unable to determine the state (inbound, outbound) of the IMS.
Thus the MTA will still deliver messages into the IMS' hidden mailbox for
external delivery if certain conditions are met. Since the IMS was set to
inbound only, those messages were never looked at. Not until you set it to
Two comments, neither of which will immediately solve your problem[1]:
1. You're saying that you have a MAPI client installed on your Exchange
server[2]? Generally considered A Bad Idea.
2. Nobody will touch it until you prove that the script isn't causing
the problems? It's generally
I use the MAPI outlook 98 client on the server. I have profiles for all the
conference rooms that have the script installed on them. This way we can
open the mailboxes for them in a consistent manner. We are running Exchange
5.5 SP4 with the CDO hot fix as of April, which we thought would have
Hey Diane, did you say what version of server you are on? Did you apply
that cdo patch already? I don't have that free/busy problem anymore, but I
still have the problem where after 15 minutes the item is still sitting in
the inbox of the room and then it generates an error and won't go back to
If you had give me some technical advice to fix the technical problem I sure
would send you a certificate.
Diane
Diane Boehm
SC Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have to question that. I have NO free/busy issues, just script stops
firing issues, and we open them all, all the time, in this manner.
YMMV clearly.
-Original Message-
From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have done this, and run /cleanfreebusy between uninstalling and
reinstalling, as well as after reinstalling, and still no go. Sorry. Any
other ideas? If anyone would like pictures of what we are seeing, I can
send them to you. You probably wouldn't believe it.
Diane
Diane Boehm
SC
2. Disable the user's NT account.
VB:
Dim User as IADsUser
Dim UserName as String
Dim UserDomain as String
UserDomin = Your_NT_Domain
UserName = User_To_Be_Axed
Set User = GetObject(WinNT:// UserDomain / Username ,user)
Dim NewValue as Boolean
NewValue = True
User.AccountDisabled =
Does anyone know if you can join a 5.5 server to a 2K site. I have a 2K
test domain setup and I want to do the following:
Create NT domain and build 5.5 server in it and then join ex2k site. Is
this possible, thanks,
_
List
I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 and clients are using Outlook 98. I have 2
particular users in which all users are able to see their Inbox by going to
File--Open--Other Users Folder. I have checked the permissions tab for
the mailbox properties and only their secretaries are there besides the
I would Diane! I have a room in Sioux Falls that is not accepting anything.
NOTHING is different from the other 11 that do accept fine. Since I'm here
and not there I can't see it, but I have looked at everything 12 times and I
don't see anything different. I have had the admin there delete,
They granted the default group permissions on their inbox via Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Wagnitz, Trevor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: All users can view two other users inbox
I am running Exchange
I don't remember. I didn't build the box. That was back in Dec 98. We
have installed SPs after Outlook 98, which service pack are you referring
to? Outlook 98 was installed when we built the server and wasn't been
recently installed.
I have found the following cdo.dll files:
Good point, Lori. Yes, I use an antivirus scanner that has a MAPI
interface. I don't, however, use it in MAPI scan mode. I use that
antivirus API in conjunction with a gateway scanner. The reason I don't
use it in MAPI is because I get unspecified mapi error. So now I'm
laughing at myself.
Intriguing. Next maintenance I may try to switch over to that mode. I'm
quite sure I'm running mapi mode now.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
