How about adding the Exchange Mailbox Store column in the AD users and
computers snapin? There is also a Home-MDB or similar column for
Exchange 5.5 but I do not have one in front of me right now to determine
the exact column name.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
In addition you can look up the Home server from within Outlook. Open the
Address book from within Outlook (I've only checked this on O2K). Make sure
Global Address list is in the Show names from the field, then right click
and select properties, It will give you the home server of the user.
I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4. If I compose a new mail and type in a Partial
name, I can click on the Check Name icon and Outlook tries to resolve the
name for me. If it can't resolve it, it comes up with a list of possible
matches.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wenger
Hey, we're not all PHBs, Erik! Some of us have to do the technical stuff
ourselves
g,dr
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 August 2002 19:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
Nobody on this should list should read the
Correct, I modify the email domain name and exchange accepts for that
new domain.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 August 2002 04:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changing Reply To address
a header rewrite per domain? So, that
snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. /snip
Ok, so I'm not the creme de la creme but I wouldn't count myself as the
creme de la merde either (no comments pls!) but why not look at headers?
When our mail server was used as a spam relay I looked at them and could
see where
Please take a look at this scenario and let me know what you may think
is wrong please. In our first site we have to bridgeheads. 1 5.5 IMC
and 1 2k SMTP connector. I switched all internet to flow through the
SMTP connector inbound and outbound. I have an address space of * with
a cost of 1
Chris,
I'd just thought of writing event sinks to solve the local delivery problem
on Friday, but haven't had a chance to look into it.
I must admit, the boss said this is how I want it done I've been trying
to do it that way. I think a step back would be a good idea. I'm going to
look for
HOW DO USERS ATTACH TO AN EXCHANGE SERVER, AND THEY ARE NOT
ADMINISTRATORS. I WAS LOOKING IN TO SESSIONS IN EXCHANGE AND THERE WERE A
FEW USERS ATTACH TO IT BESIDES THE SYSTEM ATTENDANT. THEY DON'T HAVE
EXCHANGE ADMIN ON THIER MACHINES.
One more question for today and I will be done:) I have resource
calendars setup on one of our 5.5 servers using Mr. Stongs Code.
Everything works fine except on one calendar. When I add it as an
attendee and let the meeting request set open for 3 seconds or so, the
outlook just closes. This
Possibly by using a mail client!
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August 2002 14:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Problem 5.5. SP/3
HOW DO USERS ATTACH TO AN EXCHANGE
All,
I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP 4 on the server in question. I'm running
OWA off this server. And it seems as of yesterday OWA isn't functioning
correctly. I've tried and restart the WWW services. Once Ive done
that it will work for about 3-5 mins and then return the same error when
you try
Also remember that this is how the Klez family of viruses works (ie it
spoofs addresses in an infected machine's address book).
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Rob Hackney
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 07:49
To: Exchange
I have two userids - one is a domain admin and the other is a regular domain
user.
The domain user account is linked to my mailbox. The domain admin account
does not have a mailbox.
About two weeks ago we migrated public folders from E5.5 to E2K and I am now
finding that I cannot access most
sure but then the av software will pick this up ;-))
I understand the reasons why it's not great because of the ease of
spoofing but is there any greater reason? As I've said, I find they can
be useful to find out if my server or my isp server has a problem.
-Original Message-
From:
You'll want to hear from someone more authoritative than myself, but my
understanding is that the concept of homing disappeared in E2K, so if a
public folder has several servers listed in its replication tab, all those
servers own the folder equally.
My gut is that the server would get
Naah, Erik the PHB[1] has minions to read headers for him...
[1] Hi Erik![2]
[2] Hi Sherry!
Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Reading headers is what Tiggers do best
-Original
looks like it
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August 2002 15:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
I think you missed Erik's sarcasm tags.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
There is a registry setting called No Local Delivery that was used for
Message Journaling back in the Exchange 5.5 days. This article references
this - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q239427.
Don't know if this is still around in Exchange 2000 or not.
Mike
-
The 'ASP 0115' error means that your ASP application is crashing or Dr.
Watsoning on you. See if you Dr. Watson log is getting updated at the time
of the crash. If it is not, it is something internal to IIS itself. Try
setting the website in its own memory space to see if the problem follow the
Mike,
Another person trying to do a very similar setup to mine also suggested
tried this registry change. Unfortunately, we've both found that for E2k it
doesn't appear to work.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Wendy
- Original Message -
From: Mike Lagase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Hi everyone,
I've been having this problem for some time and was wondering if anyone
could help me with it. I have this NT4 server
with PPTP installed plus some VPN connections. The staff can now dial into
their local ISP and can open Outlook client
and get their mail. They can also browse the
Hi all;
we used to have a 5.5 exchange server ,we tried to add a 2000 server for
coexistence and removing the old one later ,but then things went bad and our
5.5 get totaly crashed ,so we decided to format and have a new
administrative group ,now we can't remove the old 5.5 site and some
Strange. I couldn't find it by article number either. Here is the link.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q318239
Thanks...Ray
Quote of the day:
When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him.
-- Thomas Szasz
Q147298 implies that there is a maximum number of rules that a user is allowed,
subject to a 32Kb limit; each rule taking up a 650 bytes. Presuming that this
limitation is still in place on E2K, how do I found out how large a rules file a user
has on the server? On the client I'd be looking
I had the same problem. the solution was to install the exchange with all
service packs before installing sp2 for win2k.
hope that helps
Kris Hofmann
- Original Message -
From: Exchange Discussions digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: exchange digest recipients [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Thanks alot, Chris. You've been a great help. Will definitely look into
these. :-)
Wendy
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: Help stopping local delivery
Take a
Mike, do you think it has anything to do with the error message I'm
getting that is below at the very end? Please let me know.
Thank you,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Under what circumstances does the IUSR_EXCHANGE account log on? What is
this account used for? In addition to this account I have my Exchange
service account.
Curt
_
List posting FAQ:
Is the name of your Exchange server Exchange by chance?
-Original Message-
From: Dandy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IUSR_EXCHANGE account
Under what circumstances does the IUSR_EXCHANGE account log on?
The marketing dept of my company has just told me they were asked to buy
some mass email software called infacta (www.infacta.com) by a director.
Apart from the obvious issues like bandwidth (they're on a 128 dialup
isdn!) what other issues should I be looking out for?
thanks
Rob
intY has
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IUSR_EXCHANGE account
Is the name of your Exchange server Exchange by chance?
-Original Message-
From: Dandy, Jim
Looks kind of cool.
Of course with 128K, it will put your connection in the dump while any mail
blasts are sent...
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mass email software
The marketing
Agreed.
Are your lists opt-in, opt-out, or just plain old hijacked?
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mass email software
You need to watch for those who will shortly be trying
I would generally agree with you. However in this day and age, many, many
companies take advantage of mass mailings. The key is to do it correctly and
ethically. The correct way is to use opt-in (preferably double opt-in)
lists. These are ones that people have specifically signed up for.
Out-out
Recreate his mail profile.
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and PPTP + VPN
Hi everyone,
I've been having this problem for some time and was wondering if anyone
could help me
Eng! Wrong Answer...especially if you are using McAfee. See link
below.
McAfee anti-virus software fails to block Klez virus sometimes...
http://www.silicon.com/public/door?6004REQEVENT=REQINT1=54540REQSTR1=silic
on.com
(may wrap)
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney
In case no one has answered you on this try Outlook Plus Pak for OWA2000 by
messageware.com. You'll love it.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 5:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Address book
a... Deckler's back. It's been a long time...
- Original Message -
From: Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers.
I am normally reluctant to plug products too much for risk of appearing to be a
homer. But when you find a product that works as advertised, and works well, it's
time to notice. We've been using the Plus Pak product that was spoken of for a while
now, and it's great. Our out-of-town students
What happens when you try to send them mail by hand?
-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 550 Relaying Mail
Greetings All,
When sending mail to a particular domain we receive the
It's the same as far as I know.
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Maximum number of rules per user per server
Q147298 implies that there is a maximum number of rules that a
user is
Yea tried that and it didn't work either
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bryon Barkley
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Directories
Try using the complete domain name, e.g
I have seen the old Cisco smtp fixup cause this. Are you behind one of
those.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 550 Relaying Mail
What happens when you try to send them mail by
Try these. Q261655 , Q305088 , Q308601
-Original Message-
From: marwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: event log
Hi all;
each night I get the following error messeges in
the event log of my exchage 2000
our Internet Traffic goes thru a Cisco 1601. I'm not familiar with it's
settings.
Skip Taylor, MCSE
Network Administrator
Jordan, Jones, Goulding
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:11 PM
When sending them mail by hand, they receive it.. Eventually.
Skip Taylor, MCSE
Network Administrator
Jordan, Jones, Goulding
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussion
Subject: RE: 550
do you by any chance have you're exchange server sending the mail (relay)
thru your ISP's mail relay server?
(or is it set to just do it's own DNS lookups?..pure to the Internet)
bill
-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:08 PM
What do I mean by 'by hand'? In the raw, via telnet.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 550 Relaying Mail
What do you mean by hand?
I am looking for opinions about hardware for E2k.
Would it be better to have a single processor PII 400 w/ 384MB of RAM or a
dual PII 300 with 256MB of RAM? The sever doesn't get a lot us usage but I
want to be better prepared for when the usage increases.
Thanks,
Mike
Number of total users? Will the machine be doing anything else? What drive
configuration? What does your network architecture look like? More information would
help...
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:13 PM
To:
So the dually would be a better option for Exchange or just max out the PII
400 with as much RAM as it will hold?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hardware Question
Oh
No its only function is Exchange. It does have McAfee Groupshield installed
though. Client access is OWA and Outlook 2K+2.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hardware
Will this serve as the gateway as well, with antivirus software, OWA
usage, content management, etc?
Personally, I think both are insufficient on the memory side.
I have a PII/300 w/ 384MB RAM hosting 12 users with varied connections
and it is maxed. But it does work fairly well.
Given
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, at 6:13pm, Mike Carlson wrote:
Would it be better to have a single processor PII 400 w/ 384MB of RAM or a
dual PII 300 with 256MB of RAM? The sever doesn't get a lot us usage but
I want to be better prepared for when the usage increases.
Go with the one with more RAM.
I will default to as much as possible. :o)
Other factors will contribute to performance like network bandwidth,
drive configuration, what else is on the box.
Use the box with as much RAM as possible. If you can move that RAM to
the one with dual processors, great.
-Original
How many users roughly?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hardware Question
No its only function is Exchange. It does have McAfee Groupshield
Oh cool. Then the users will not be expecting perfection. I'd still go
with as much RAM as possible for the Exchange box.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Agreed, with that load it won't matter a lot which of the two you use. I'd probably
pick the dual 300 box and upgrade it by another 256M of RAM.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Anyone having problems with IE 5.5 intermittantly working with OWA 2000? By
intermittant, I mean works fine on machine A, but machine B (which seems to be
configured the same) hangs during connection (you get the folder pane, but no owa
icon bar and no messages).
Here's the specifics:
Since you won't have to worry about the Exchange 5.5/2K coexistence phase, then by all
means implement Exchange 2K. It's a much better product. It's more scaleable, more
logical, has much better web interface, etc. Yes, there is a learning curve to learn
the new administrative interfaces,
Hello, Everyone, still the investigation is going on with the ISP, let's see what
comes out. Meantime, can I put restriction on my distribution list(DL)? so that only
my domain users can send messages using the DL's. I know I can put restriction on
users basis.
Thanks Regards
-Original
Server-side rules are stored in a hidden message in theie inbox on the
server(?).
The limitation is still in place, but it is an Outlook limitation versus
Exchange. MAPI requires all rules to be contained in a single RPC
packet.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The mailer should be called 'Infecta'.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mass email software
You need to watch for those who will shortly be trying
What tools did you use for this migration?
What do you see in the app event viewer? Were the organisation forms
migrated as well?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gabriele
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:55 AM
To: Exchange
65 matches
Mail list logo
