PLEASE GUYS I NEED SOME INFO ON THE BELOW URGENTLY
I need access to information regarding the specific, detailed mechanisms and
controls that will ensure that the confidentiality of all emails within the
organziation's Exchange network can be protected at all times, while at the
same time, in
No - simply Windows, Exchange and the compaq tools
I read that it is best to only install virus software on the back end
servers in a FE/BE situation
Helen
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
These are all clean - thanks
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex2k and IIS Problem
And there's definitely no trace on the BE servers either?
I like the way my company handles this. Put simply, we consider the work
week to be seven days, not five. I'm required to work a minimum of 40
hours a week (Yes, I'm salary). Those 40 hours can be spread out across
the week however I wish.
I should mention that I'm a consultant and don't have any
1. Buy a book or look on m$security/ win2000/ permissions/
company policies and procedures
2. event viewer...
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net]
Sent: 29 October 2002 08:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange White PAper???
The info is more targeted at a CEO level not a technician level... any other
ideas or books I can read or recommend?
Regards,
Carlos Magalhaes
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney;tkcsales.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange
This may be a simple question, but I was asked by my manager to get him some stats on
how much email we get and send each day.
We are running Exchange 2000 SP2.
Other then manually looking through the logs, is there a tool that can read the logs
and spit out the information I need
--
Vincent
The MS website has lots of marketing blurbs written for the non-techie.
Actually, since you're looking to get information for your CEO perhaps you
should be asking this question directly of MS instead of a bunch of plebes
who aren't required to stand behind what they say.
-Original
Ok here's the Complete Rundown
You are correct most of the rules were written on Outlook 98 (Inbox
Assistant)
The rule is pretty simple it states
apply this rule after message arrives
where my name is in the To or CC box
forward it to
Now when this guy receives a new
So? Are you the list mommy? I only saw it here once. I saw a separate
post on the other list. I don't see the problem, and I especially don't see
the benefit of you policing the lists.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com]
Sent: Monday,
I suspect its still running
Error checking and status reporting (how far have I got) were NOT included.
It could have run out of memory / resources, but it shouldn't have done so.
It worked on my Public Folder list - which is about 4000 folders.
Cheers, Chris
-Original Message-
yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange
server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need
more help dont hesitate to email me.
rich
-Original Message-
From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10
Do I need a real beefy server to handle that kind of traffic ? I'm looking
at mail blasts to 20,000 recipients once a week.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:greatcthulhu;aohell.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail
Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange
One other thing to check, if it hasn't been mentioned. Make the sure the
DSL routers are not handing out the same private subnet space as the one
you use for the exchange server. Exchange is the first place subnet
routing confusion will show up.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original
lmhost file also you have to take the .sam extension off then edit it.
Another thing you will have to use is nbtstat -R and nbtstat -c to check it
after you entered the right info in the lmhost file.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29,
Not especially; SMTP doesn't require all that much work. The more threads,
the better, though eventually there will be a trade-off in delivery queues
vs. performance.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Exchange
Ah When you first opened his inbox using a higher version of OL and went
to the rules it should have asked if you wanted to convert the rules to the
newer format (I forget the exact wording). If you said yes the user on the
downlevel client is screwed.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan,
I am not sure I was not the first admin to open them...
But these are Server Based Rules Why would it matter if I did that... Also
we have other users on Campus experiencing the same problem and we have
never been in their mailboxes
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault
Server-based only means they run on the server. The server itself does not
maintain the rules. That you deleted the rule and recreated it in XP
confirms that the rules format has been changed. OL pre-2000 can't read the
newer format so no rules fire. And it gives no error.
Only thing I can think
Ok I'll give that a try
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules not running correctly
Server-based only means they run on the server. The server itself does not
That's a pretty big hole to leave open, especially if the cause of your main
site downtime is the result of a virus.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original
Apply the latest SP for Office. It seems to be fixing a similar issue I've
got with a few resource mailboxes
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original
Perzactly - and in general they display the specific email message(s) that
won you the honor of being on their list.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original
I jumped in this thread late but, are the 20 or so user using Word as an
email editor?
Clint
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for
I had this problem as well and I removed Windows XP SP1 and it fixed it
for one user.
I was seeing the problem as well after I install XP SP1 and I noticed
that even though my Office XP said I had SP1 installed when I tried to
install SP2 it said I need SP1. I reinstalled SP1 and 2 and all is
I have a user that whenever she receives mail from a particular user in the
company it always moves tht mail to the deleted items. Now this is a server
based rule because it is moving it on the server. But when I created the
profile on my machine there were no rules setup for the account. Any
I have some thoughts.
.Are you getting them, yet?
- Original Message -
From: Kleciak, Clint D N21 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 08:41
Subject: ESP
Does anyone have any information (tips, tricks, notes, thoughts,
try e-nspect (www.e-nspect.co.uk) which doesnt use the low data content
exchange log files, so you can also get information about your attachments
too..
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29,
Promodag (at promodag.com) can give you what you want.
There are several other reporting products as well. You can query the
archives or the FAQ for more information.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone
IIRC, updating SPs and disabling Wordmail have already been suggested, but
then again, Im getting senile.
-Original Message-
From: Kleciak, Clint D N21 [mailto:Clint.Kleciak;CIGNA.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow
Exchange Stress Performance, you can down load at
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2000/ESP.asp
-Original Message-
From: Kleciak, Clint D N21 [mailto:Clint.Kleciak;CIGNA.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ESP
Does anyone
I was going to stay away from that... But has anyone called The Amazing
Kreskin?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:hawkinoz;hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:18 AM
To: Exchange
They used to have a Hold DJ, that would tell you the longest on hold time
was for the various queues. It at least made the wait bearable.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT)
I guess I was hoping for something a bit more free
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stats for Email
Promodag (at promodag.com) can give you what you want.
LMHOSTS files are for your connected on a public network (internet) and
HOSTS for when connected on a private.
- Original Message -
From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:17 AM
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Is it
I think it is the other way..lmhosts is for netbios names..hosts are in
fully qualified domain names.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: VPN breaks Outlook
LMHOSTS files
Outlook by default will use the hosts file first, then the DNS Server,
followed by NetBIOS Cache, WINS server, then Broadcast and lastly the
LMHOSTS file. -- unless you have mucked with the binding order.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com]
Sent:
Gosh it's been awhile since I had to mess with them. You might be right.
- Original Message -
From: Stevens, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
I think it is the other way..lmhosts
That was part of the problem...we went to the link on their site for our IP
address, but no information was available on the specific message. It just
gave a date that showed when we were first blacklisted. We spent about 2
days trying to get additional information from them. They finally sent us
I would tend to believe the user in this case. Outlook does a crummy job of modifying
meetings in certain circumstances. The way it does it is by cancelling and
re-inviting. If I recall, changing the invite list is one of the things that will do
this. There is not, again working from
My guess is that you just had a bad day (or week) with them. Besides being quite
responsive, they send a warning to your postmaster@ mailbox when they list you.
Really quite courteous.
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcoleman;state.mt.us]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29,
??? That's backwards from anything I've heard. Everything I've seen says Forest
Prep, Domain Prep, *then* ADC. Not disagreeing with what you've seen, but wondering
about the inconsistency.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, October
The definition of a rules-based server is whether or not the rule can run
without the client logged on.
What version of OL are you and the user running? Is her delivery point set
to her PST?
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:CCallan;fnly.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29,
Not to mention, I prefer to use other people's servers for spam propagation,
lest mine get black holed.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
MTU size.
Check the MTU size on the clients, and ensure that it is set at no higher
than 1400. Search technet for specifics.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
If you try to run forestprep first, and choose to join an existing 5.5 site,
it will fail saying that it can't find the ADC. The Deployment guide has a
flowchart showing the ADC installation first, then forestprep, then
domainprep.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams
http://www.messageone.com
Look at MessageView
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com]
Go back in your hole, Tener. That's not remotely close to the solution.
In fact, LMHosts is almost never the solution.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
Because you use it does not mean that everyone should use it.
I vote for HOSTS.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
yes you should use the lmhost file on the
Neither - its not a name resolution issue, since you can connect to other
host on your internal network. So, you'd be best off if you ignore Mr.
Tener. Many of us have for months.
See my previous post about MTU size. Outlook sets[1] the Do Not Fragment bit
on much of its traffic with the server.
The error I described, if used in a rule would be a server based rule
because it is moving mail from the Inbox Folder, to the Deleted Items Folder
in that particular Mailbox, not to a pst file. They are running I believe
either O2k or O98
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault
I vote for a solution that addresses the problem, personally. Keep bickering
over hosts/lmhosts, as neither solves the issue at hand.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
No.
LMHosts is for LanManager[1] name resolution. More properly called NetBIOS
name resolution[2], i.e. when WINS isn't available and broadcast won't cut
it.
Hosts is for host resolution, more commonly served by DNS servers.
--
Roger D.
Maybe someone had a bad experience in Montana?
We're monitoring the blocks pretty closely, and it seems so far that they're
not hitting legitimate traffic, yet.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger
Nah - ADC /schemaonly, then /forestprep, then /domainprep.
Then again, Ed's the one that told me that in the first place, but I saw
some backup of that in an ADC whitepaper.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis -
Neither, use WINS and DNS, works every time...
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ?
-Original Message-
From: Tener,
7031 doesn't have to be Code Red, this can be the result of many DoS attacks as well.
Can you check that the DLLs on the FEP are indeed updated with the latest security
patch:
From Q273877
The English version of this fix should have the following file attributes or later:
Date Time
There was a change in the rules engine in OL2K that is incompatible with
rules from OL98.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:CCallan;fnly.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving
The error I described, if used in a
Try using CleanSweep on the mailbox.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:CCallan;fnly.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving
The error I described, if used in a rule would be a server based rule
because it is
I'm thinking there's a connection between SPAMCop and George Custer :-)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Maybe someone had a bad experience in Montana?
We're
yes that is our guess please any tip or Q-article to deploy that?
tia
-er
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: How to hidde DLs ?
You might want to build Address Lists that only
very interesting all this...but I have a simple Q for you.
When you do the VPN via the DSL/Linksys (shutter...linksys)
Ok once the vpn is established.can you ping the Exchange server? by
name? by full name?
i.e. in my case my exchange box is MERCURY...thus I would do
PING MERCURY
then I might
I do not have the cleansweep tool, as I do not have the 5.5 Resource Kit.
Does anyone know where I can get it.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:DurkeeP;LanePowell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Moving
Try using
Very true.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:53 AM
Subject: RE: Joining Site
But he'll need higher permissions later to set up CAs so he might as
well set them up now.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I
This is a correct explanation of the issue. Name resolution could have been
ruled out by the info originally provided.
Jpc- I've seen this often. don't know about alcatel, but some vpn clients
allow a mtu config option in the client software which is helpful to limit
tcp payload per packet.
That is just the point there is no rule, there are no rules, yet the e-mails
are being moved into the Deleted Items Folder.
cc
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message
there are some situations when one must use HOSTS file.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely;TripathImaging.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Neither, use WINS and DNS, works every time...
-Original
Thanks.
This is exactly what I was looking for.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stats for Email
Promodag (at promodag.com) can give you what you want.
There are
usually HOSTS overrides them all.
[1] maybe because LanManager smells a little of IBM ? :)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
No.
LMHosts is
try http://support.microsoft.com
use key words like: organize address list exchange 2000
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:MicrosoftExchangeListServer;csi.exch.cgnet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to
I'm thinking that someone does not check the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox.
;)
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcoleman;state.mt.us]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I'm thinking there's a connection between SPAMCop and
Ah - interesting. Thanks Roger, Hunter, and of course - Ed.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Joining Site
Nah - ADC /schemaonly, then /forestprep, then /domainprep.
Ed
Thanks for your help. This was very much appreciated. The only difference being that I
have to use FAXSERVE instead of FAX as the primary address.
Regards
Marc Mearns
.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: 29 October 2002 05:51
To:
You can try using Exmerge to do the same thing, albeit a little less surgically. Set
it to archive what it calls Associated Folder Messages from the afflicted mailbox's
Inbox. You'll also want to delete any relevant RWZ files.
It also occurs to me that before you do that, you might try logging
hostmaster@, postmaster@, and abuse@ all get checked daily. Sometimes more
frequently than that if there's nothing better to do ;)
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:jen;fluke.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I'm
Hi Guys,
I have an E2K single server that is not allowing messages over 6Mb to be
sent out. I have checked the outbound limits in the SMTP protocol, the
default limits on the main settings and the user's AD settings. I have
searched Microsoft support for all 5.2.3 errors as well, and looked at
I have two users when they try to logon to outlook web access they get an
error that reads Unable to Process Successfully.
Then if I click the troubleshooting button it reads unauthorized user
These users are set up exactly as other people who are working correctly.
Any Thoughts?
Thanks,
TypePerf, available on XP, lets you query monitors (counters) and put the
output into a csv file. It's free with Resource Pack (I think). You can
schedule a job to set it off (from a workstation) and then design some Excel
macros that will tidy up the data.
I reckon you could get a fairly good
Hi All,
In Q182504 MS make out it's really easy to turn POP3 and IMAP logging on and
off using a change to the Registry. They say that the next session will
activate the Registry change. Well, yes and no. On one server I can get the
file handle on all but one log file released, on another I only
Hi Guys,
I have an E2K single server that is not allowing messages over 6Mb to be
sent out. I have checked the outbound limits in the SMTP protocol, the
default limits on the main settings and the user's AD settings. I have
searched Microsoft support for all 5.2.3 errors as well, and looked at
1) Urgent!! need to upgrade to Exchange 5.5 Enterprise.
What is involved?
Will this mess up my current exchange 5.5?
2) How do clean(flush)the deleted retention?
3) How do we safely move the database files? (Priv.edb, pub.edb ect...)
Thanks
Mike
The problem as it stands now is that our Exchange Server cant generate an
offline address book for the GAL and our users cant download the address
book to their laptops. This is an MSX 5.5 server and is the only one
servicing this site. The workstations are a mixture of Windows based OS
and
No there aren't. There are times in which its easier than doing it a
different way, but that doesn't mean there are times in which they must be
used.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and
Nope - first match wins. In the case of Win2k, however, HOSTS comes before
LMHOSTS, so it seems to win.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
Hi, folks:
Thank you very much for all your responses. I've started to try your
suggestions and will get back with an update as to which one fixes our
problem.
Thanks also for the good luck wishes...I appreciate it.
Hope things are better at your end of the Exchange world!
-Juancho
So let me ask you question, I could never figure it out.
I have pptp setup on a windows nt server that is my pdc. We use this to
connect to our exchange server which is a bdc. If i connect to the my
server over the vpn and dont use the lmhost file I cannot connect to my
exchage to read my
I I'm guilty of not doing that. Or knowing to do that. I thought those
mails would just come to the administrator account. How do you go about
checking them? I can't seem to get outlook to check those boxes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have aliases set up so that all of them go into one mailbox. The
permissions on that mailbox are set so that several of us can all check it
with our accounts (either File-open other user's folder or set the profile
to open these additional mailboxes)
Hunter
-Original Message-
From:
Have they always been?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
My guess is that you just had a bad day (or week) with
What is the exact path that message took?
- Original Message -
From: Gary Duckman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:05 AM
Subject: Non-existent E2K size limits?
Hi Guys,
I have an E2K single server that is not allowing
*sigh*
I asked what version the user is running and what version you are running.
If they are not the same version than you can not say, with surety, that
there are no rules on the mailbox.
Now, think it through logically: messages don't move themselves anywhere.
Either a human does it or a rule
1: Insert Ent CD, Run Setup and install over the standard version. SP to
latest version.
2) Set the deleted item retention to 0 days and tonight it should dump it
all during maint.
3) Use the Exchange Optimizer. Run it and it will tell you where it wants
the stuff. At that point you can make the
So let me ask you question, I could never figure it out.
I have pptp setup on a windows nt server that is my pdc. We use this to
connect to our exchange server which is a bdc. If i connect to the my
server over the vpn and dont use the lmhost file I cannot connect to my
exchage to read my
Have them clear their browser cache. Then try again. That is one of a few
but first that comes to mind.
- Original Message -
From: Robinson, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: OWA Exchange5.5
I have two
How are they connected when they try to do a Sync.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 1:59 AM
Subject: Offline Address Book Sync Failure.
The problem as it stands now is that our Exchange Server cant
First match WINS?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Roger
Seielstad
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Nope - first match wins. In the case of Win2k, however,
Try making a new subject first when posting to this list.
- Original Message -
From: Manderino, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
1) Urgent!! need to upgrade to Exchange 5.5
Are you sure it isn't the receiving server giving you the error?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Gary Duckman [mailto:gd;bbs.eu.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Non-existent E2K size limits?
Hi Guys,
I have an E2K single server
90% of the time I have seen this in regards to E55 in an NT4 domain it has
to do with the remote PC not being passed the WINS server info.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
