How to Restore explicit folder data from the Exchange backup

One of our users mistakenly deleted his past Friday's calendar information through his PDA. We do have a backup of our Exchange server data for this past weekend. My question is there any utility in exchange which will let me restore only his calendar information from the backup? Any assistance

RE: E2K Logging question

Michael - Thank you very much for the assistance today. I finally found the problem: I was looking in the SMTP logs in %windir%\system32\logfiles, not in correct place of C:\Program Files\Exchsrv\server.log directory. Once looking in the correct log, I found the outgoing email. This of c

RE: E-mail Address Already Exists?

tech? sheesh whats the name of the person at the front desk? [EMAIL PROTECTED]? how bout the cfo? [EMAIL PROTECTED]? do you address each other like: secretary: good morning tech. tech: thank you, good morning to you too secretary. have you seen manager around? secretary: yes, he is having coffee wi

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Note: on this solution...You will need to load the E-fax client software also read their aggrement..I seem to remember it has some features to it... 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Nunez, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discuss

RE: E-mail Address Already Exists?

The answer was with the Public Folders, no sooner had I written "tried every such criteria" as my brain said no you have not. It was a sysadmin folder with an alias of [EMAIL PROTECTED] All is well, have a good weekend. Cheers, Nathna -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

RE: OWA access problems

Make sure that the default recipient policy has an entry for all the domains. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Albert Char

RE: E-mail Address Already Exists?

Update RUS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tech Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail Address Already Exists? Gurus, I am experiencing a weird problem with our Sysadmin Account. I was trying to

E-mail Address Already Exists?

Gurus, I am experiencing a weird problem with our Sysadmin Account. I was trying to send e-mail from an external address and it was giving an NDR that did not help. I have deleted this account and tried to recreate it but it will not give me the original SMTP address. When I try creating the [EM

RE: Abwesen.tsnotiz: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Ok thanks! -Original Message- From: "Luck, Sönke" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:00 PM To: Johnny Martinez Subject: Abwesent.snotiz: Fax to SMTP Appliance Ich bin bis zum 6. Februar 2003 nicht im Büro. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Krzysztof W

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

This topic should be on the FAQ's. I see it a few times a month. I've even asked it before hehe. The same folks say the same thing too (thanks for sharing btw.) J -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:45 AM To: NT 2000 Discussi

RE: OWA access problems

yes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Albert Charron Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA access problems Hi. I don't know if this is by design or if it's a misconfiguration on my server. We host 3

OWA access problems

Hi. I don't know if this is by design or if it's a misconfiguration on my server. We host 3 domains on our Exchange 2000 server (SP3). Only users on 1 of these domains are able to use OWA. All users are able to log through Outlook 2000, this situation occurs only with OWA. Example: DomainA

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

If you are really low volume (under 20-50 faxes a month), try www.efax.com You lose a little in-house control, but the service is reliable (I have used it for over a year without issue) and affordable. Regards, Danny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archives - Buy yours today.

Was that Exchange or MSMail? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Szabo Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Archives - Buy yours today. Sorry Chris, I have my own, starting from '95. /Peter -

RE: E2K Logging question

If the SMTP logs don't show any outgoing records, then maybe the Virtual SMTP server is not even trying to send them? -Original Message- From: Michael A. Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Logging question Hello

RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

Y = Yeah and R = Right. The rest is left as an exercise for the reader. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike S

Re: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

Not at all, it's hard enough just finding the CIW. Let me rephrase the question, how I can get Outlook to not use the setup wizard when it starts, and instead just start with the correct settings? I had assumed creating an MST would be the answer, but I can't seem to get it to work. As a backgrou

RE: OWA at base URL? - simple question.

It is possible See: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;319878 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA at base URL? - si

OWA at base URL? - simple question.

Is it possible to move OWA to the base URL so users don't have to go to: http(s)://servername/exchange ? -Yanek. - This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and use

RE: Email distribution load leveling

Yeah, I was kinda thinking the same thing. Just was wondering if anyone knew of a cheap (relative term, I know) prefab solution. Well, I will let this linger out there a bit longer and see what pops. -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, Janua

RE: Email distribution load leveling

Script it? Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email distribution load leveling Can anyone think of a way to distribute mail from an smtp

RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

YFR You Friendly Republican? Hmmm =;-) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup So you really expect that someone reading this will go run t

RE: Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

So you really expect that someone reading this will go run the CIW to find the answer to your question? YFR. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Email distribution load leveling

Can anyone think of a way to distribute mail from an smtp address to multiple recipients in a round robin sort of way? I am running Exchange 2000. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

Office 2000 MST and Outlook/Exchange setup

I have set up a custom installation of Office 2000 using the Office 2000 resource kit. I ran the Custom Installation Wizard to create an MST file to specify options for Outlook. I then create a GPO that assigns the msi file for Office modified with the MST. What I want to have happen is that Outloo

RE: outlook script config

The Microsoft Office (Outlook) Custom Installation Wizard is the supported method of doing what you ask. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Can't create large PDL in outlook XP

You've reached the limit on the number of Contacts a PDL can have which I think is 165 ___ \\ - - // (--@-@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego

RE: Masquerading

IIS in the bin. Ok. I'm working on RedHat 8.0 and SENDMAIL at the moment. Clunky but getting there. Are there any NT based, cheep/freeware MTA's that can totally modify the header and envelope? Thanks K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

RE: Arcserve 2000 and MSX 5.5

I totally agree with Ed. Exclude these from your backup routines. For DR of our Exchange box, I just make sure that I use the Exchange agent from Arcserve to backup Exchange part of the box (in Arcserve). Then I make a duplicate server (down to the name, SP, and all) and restore just the Exchan

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

No I don't, but enjoy one from time to time. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance He drives a Hummer too -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Same with ours. A single lost fax could cost us thousands of dollars. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Im with Martin It basically depends on what you do.

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

He drives a Hummer too -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- Fro

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Im with Martin It basically depends on what you do. Ive got 2 DID trunks(120 numbers), 16 analog lines into the fax server stand alone fax machines well over 25 2 fax machines for 100 people..wow it would seem like too few to me. then do yourself the favor buy the best unit you can casue when one

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Thanks. I still planned to keep our main fax. We currently have two. One is dedicated to incoming and the other is for sending and overflow incoming. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subje

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

We do a TON of faxing. I have fax servers and about 6 fax machines for 70 users. They are always all busy. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance You buy expen

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

P.S. even if you had the whole fax thing to exchange etc...you always need a good fax machine. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Thanks Bill. Good info.

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Thanks Bill. Good info. Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax. I'm going to check out Panafax. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance then do y

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

then do yourself a favor get a good Panafax. But note these are industrial/business machines and are not cheap. say like 850 and up..but they never die... you get what you pay for... You better research this a bit more. Cause you not getting away with anything cheap if you want it reliable. First

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got ab

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:18 PM To: Exchan

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

$20 -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Origi

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but t

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

5.5 -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Are you running Exchange 2000 or Exchange 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Messag

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Are you running Exchange 2000 or Exchange 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive.

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product http:/

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Checked into that one... Unfortunately it either forwards as a property format and a viewer needs to be installed, or it forwards as a self-viewing file (exe) which outlook and Antigen both choke on. I would like the faxes to be TIF or even better, PDF. Aaron -Original Message- From: Bre

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Winfax pro is pretty cheap around $100 I think. Not sure if it automatically will forward it however. If not I am sure it wouldn't take much to write a program to do it for you. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:01 AM

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We rec

OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance

Hi All, We receive a low volume of faxes and send even less. I am interested in finding a simple and inexpensive way to forward faxes to an email address on my Exchange 5.5 server. We are not interested in allowing folk to fax from their PC. Ideally, I would like to find an appliance that could

RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5

You can also help performance, if any of the problem servers have IMCs, by turning off outbound SMTP scanning. -Peter -Original Message- From: BBC Exchange 55 List Server Public Folder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: S

E2K Logging question

Hello, I have an E2K SP3 system and am having some trouble with emails being sent and not arriving at their external destinations. I've turned up logging on the Virtual SMTP Server, and chose all options in the Advanced Properties page. Going through the log, I seem to only see incoming emails, n

Post SP4 Patches

Anybody searched for Post SP4 Patches for Exchange 5.5 lately? I USED to be able to go to Microsofts site, select Downloads - Exchange 5.5, and select Post SP4 patches, and it would allow me to sort by date blah blah blah. Doesn't work anymore. Thanks. Robert ___

Tentative meeting requests

Exch2k sp3 When on e of our users receives a meeting request, it does not get put on his calendar automatically as tentative. He doesn't have any rules that moves meeting requests. I ran a free busy update, but no go. Any ideas? He is using Mac Outlook, but this happens if I open his mail on a

RE: OWA

I want to Thank You everyone for the helping me with the setup of IIS5 and OWA. This is the best listing I have. Again Thank You. I got it to work great now. I used the Exchange 5.5 CD to install OWA. My question now is what is the next version of OWA should I need to get beside the Exchange 2000.

RE: Exchange2003

You forgot to edit out where Tony Hlabse said "B_st_rds" (see below) Tom (trying not to offend Mr. Trend) -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange2003 Thanks, Tom. I r

OWA Contacts Public Folder problem

It seems that if we do a Find from OWA, E2k, SP2 in a Contacts Public Folder it only searches fields until it finds an entry and then stops searching on that contact. SharePoint 2001 E2k Public Folder content indexing has the same problem, but that makes sense since it uses the OWA to index it.

RE: Haiku Friday

Everybody knows, a turkey and some potatoes can, Makes you sleepy. :) Or Ugly job market, I need to find something better soon, They will miss me. ;P -Original Message- From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ha

RE: Exchange2003

Allison, You probably mentioned 'Microsoft' 'catch' 'Charge' '$' in the same sentence ;-) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2003 12:49 To: Exchange Dis

Haiku Friday

Very heavy snow, disaster recovery project and few users. Tim -- Tim Gowen RAF Museum IT Dept. Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them,

Re: Exchange2003

Thanks, Tom. I realized that I sounded like a newb asking that, but I only recently began administering Windows and so never ordered anything from them. What did I say to offend the content filter at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>? Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchang

RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5

Also have you tried setting it to Max Performance mode with only one scanner selected? This will help. If your servers were already busy before installing Antigen then it can cause performance problems. Take a good look at the performance counters for disk queues, CPU, etc and see where the bottl

RE: OWA and Voice Mail

Why not build a round robin DNS entry for a few GC's, and set the TTL to something insanely short, like 1 minute? If you're able to specify the server by name, there's no reason you can't overcome that limitation. That being said, there is still a high degree of old school mentality in the telecom

RE: Masquerading

Absolutely nothing is wrong. Sendmail (and a few other *nix mta's) offer the ability to completely destroy the integrity of the message headers. Not to mention, the from address isn't only stored in the header, its stored in the message body most of the time too. ---

RE: OWA and Voice Mail

Kinda like Exchange2000 pre-sp1. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of prontomail Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions GC!. That's THE keyword. GC. It depends heavily on ONE GC. It does NOT know how to see

RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN

Literally. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:53 PM > To:

RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN

No, he looks better after the viewer's had a few beers (or preferably something stronger). -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Martin

Re: OWA and Voice Mail

GC!. That's THE keyword. GC. It depends heavily on ONE GC. It does NOT know how to seek and use other available GC for its lookups. It has to be hard-wired to just one. This would be fine for a one-site, small network. But, in my Multi-Site, multi-GC, Multi-network environment, this has been nothin

RE: OWA

Hi I have two sites in a exch 5.5 environment. I want make one OWA server and connect this server to the two sites so that people can access their mailbox form the OWA irrespective of the site he belong to. I don't want to setup 2 OWA one each for each site Regards

RE: Install Exchange 2000 as a DC or not?

Thanks Ed! With Exchange System Manager installed on the DC it works fine now for the helpdesk. Annemieke > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Ed Crowley > Verzonden:donderdag 30 januari 2003 18:03 > Aan: Exchange Discussions > Onderwerp:RE: Install Exchange 2000 as a DC or not?

outlook script config

Does any body know some way to automate the configurations such as delivery, auto archive in outlook etc Please let me know Regards Santhosh.H E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any

RE: Restore explicit folder data from the Exchange backup

it will be in the deleted item folder If he has emptied the deleted item Try recovering from the tools->recover deleted item Regards Santhosh.H Systems Administrator Timken Engineering and Research India Pvt. Ltd. Bang