Hi all,
I am trying to use Advanced Find on a Public Folder to also search it's sub
folders, however, when I try to select the sub-folders it comes up with the
message: the folder you selected does not allow you to search other
folders.
It doesn't work like this on a mailbox it allows you to
PF's can't forward mail out, they can only receive mail, at least not
without some coding.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL
We have what I consider a finely tuned AV system, utilizing multiple vendors
and multiple layers. I'm also willing to share that in the 4 years since
we've implemented our current approach, we have not been the victims of any
major virus outbreaks. That's not to say we don't get hit with the
I honestly don't know how the browser on the Palm devices renders content.
There are some alternatives if the graphics of OWA don't work. We use the
WAP and PDA products from http://www.leederbyshire.com/ for our Pocket PC
folks. It works well and is a very tight interface for the small screen.
I have not use the PageMaster. However, I've setup and been using the
Pagegate from http://www.notepage.com which is a lot better than other
paging software I've used in the past.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Hi,
I've been reading q327378 about changing mailbox size limits in a
reasonable time and have added the value for the exchangeIS.
Should I be concerned that there is not the value for
Dsaccess\Instance0\CacheTTLUser in my registry or one for Mailbox cache
limit?
If not concerned I can just go
I am trying to set up Exmerge to export specific mailboxes from an
Exchange 2000 server in batch mode. I have most of everything set up
except the mailbox.txt file. I am having trouble with the format of it.
Everytime i run it get Error Creating EntryID CN= Can some one help
with the
Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which
potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make
more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I
think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably
better for companies with
It's a feature. www.slipstick.com might list some 3rd party products
which allowed one to do this.
-Original Message-
From: Halliday S (ISeLS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:12 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching Public Folders
Subject: Searching
Can I avoid the question as asked and recommend E2K3 and OMA?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:37 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA and Palms
Subject: RE: OWA and Palms
I honestly don't know how the browser on the
Hi all,
I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server also
runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book meetings in our
public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called Meetings Rooms,
under that are several calendars each named after a specific
I'm seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and Fizzer the most, none of which are
spoofed source addresses.
You might want to take another look at these as they all spoof the sender
address. Klez and Bugbear are the reason we turned off to notify the sender.
Jeff
http://www.owaspellchecker.com
- Original Message -
From: Steve Iadarola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 15:25
Subject: OWA Spellchecker
Checked the FAQs and did not see anything. Anyone using a Spellcheck add-on
for E2K OWA?
Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out. One person suggested
OnTrack's product which looks really intriguing as well as its ability to do
bricked restore from non-bricked backups. Licensing blows though. You have
to license ALL mailboxes. Resource mailboxes too. And we easily have about
The Exmerge readme file gives exact examples to follow
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exmerge in Batch mode
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:09:21 -0700
I am trying to set up Exmerge to export specific
Upgrade to E2K/E2K3.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA Public folders
Subject: OWA Public folders
Hi all,
I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This
Roger,
This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you on...however, see
below:
Klez -
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.klez.gen.html
Email spoofing
Some variants of this worm use a technique known as spoofing. If so, the
worm randomly selects an address that it
Just from my experience[1]... The cost of software licenses is
inconsequential when you get to the total cost for compliance with many
subpoenas.
[1] Anecdotal as it may be.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:25 AM
Posted
Hmmm.. Two interesting things are that a) none of the other sources I
checked talked about spoofed sender addresses, and b) my experience has been
that the ones I have bird dogged were indeed NOT spoofed, and came from the
sender in question.
I'll stand corrected on the spoofing issue, but I
I guess what i really need to know is how to construct the DN for the
mailboxes. The readme seems to be a little vague.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
There's really no 'right' answer to this question IMO. At $vbc we didn't
send notifications to the sender, but we did to the intended recipient.
At other companies we did the opposite and at 1 we notified everyone and
their monkey.
Horses for courses I guess.
-Original Message-
From:
I forward all my virus notifications to Roger.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:43 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
My boss asked me this morning.
Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will
resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
until they respond to you?
He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral
issues etc.
Avi
LegacyExchangeDN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exmerge in Batch mode
I guess what i really need to know is how to construct the DN for the
mailboxes. The readme seems to
A mailbomber? Sounds like an excellent way to get everyone to hate your
company.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked
There may be something like this, but I will tell you this. If someone did
that to me I would just set up a rule to permanently delete all of their
messages.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Wednesday, June
Chris, is there no workaround?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 15:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders
Upgrade to E2K/E2K3.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
Sounds like a mail spamming question to me.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked me this morning.
Is there any type of program or something that if you send
Thanks for the help
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:25 AM
Posted To: Exchange Server
Conversation: Exmerge in Batch mode
Subject: RE: Exmerge in Batch mode
LegacyExchangeDN
-Original Message-
From:
Tell your boss it's a great way to get blacklisted.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Sounds like a mail spamming question to me.
-Original Message-
Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.
- Original Message -
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked me this
That is the workaround, unless you'd like to rewrite the Exchange 5.5
OWA ASP scripts to provide functionality not inherent in the product.
Ought to be possible theoretically.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:30 AM
Thanks very much for the tips Chris. Much appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders
That is the workaround, unless you'd like to rewrite the Exchange 5.5
OWA ASP scripts
Lol. Good answer Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Question
Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.
- Original
Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone
every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting
a raise.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
To:
I am loving this.
I think I will put together a nice document for him.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Then tell him you will send him pages every 2
I was wondering your opinions on the preferred UI for AV software. I have
been trying to weigh all of the current AV solutions out there, and I
can't decide which is the best, which have problems, etc. Any
recommendations?
-Darren Johnson
Carmila,
ON the KVS front it just adds 'stubs' in place of the emails and it is the
client that does the redirection retrieval. So no change at the Exchange
end.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco
Well KVS will index right up to phrases if you really want it too and
archive off the Email journaling system.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 15:25
To: Exchange
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
2 willing participants.
Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if
I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he
Hells Bells.
Sign them all up for AOL.
- Original Message -
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns
I have a user that is a owner of a public folder and he has send as and
send on behalf permissions. The send as was added later but was decided
to keep the send on behalf, as it wouldn't hurt anything. The PF mail
address is hidden from the GAL. Receives mail fine. But when the user goes
to
Just let him know that you'll probably be blacklisted if he goes forward
with this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
True, you cannot forward out of the company unless you set up a CR, but
internal email is OK to forward with the folder assistant.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11
Can you clarify if it will be internal willing recipients or external
willing recipients?
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is
I think it's worth pointing out that everyone who does send notification to virus
senders participated in what almost amounted to a DOS attack against Microsoft. You'll
recall that all sobig-b virus messages report that they came from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and I noticed significant delays in
Forgot. E2K SP3 One single PF store
,
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Perrmission denied??
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:41:39 -0400
I have a user that is a owner of a public folder and he has send
I envision a solution like this:
Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever)
where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app
sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag
What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message - Junk
E-mail - Add to Junk Senders?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange
After 2 reminders the custom application written by the user automatically
sends resume of user to monsterboard.com
** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.
The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished
here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that
emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is
the
I appreciate all the feedback. After reviewing the posts, I guess we will
have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages. I'm starting to lean
toward turning the notification off. Or possibly a combination of both?
Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ
The fact that the two parties consented to this.
Please don't get me wrong, I am completely in agreement with what the Great Crowley
says about behavioral issues and all of that, just following up for the boss.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Situation: Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on NT4 (sp6a). System needs replaced.
Built 2000 server installed Exchange 5.5 into the site. Site will not
replicate so I can't move mailboxes. Errors are:
Event ID: 1059
Source: MSExchangeDS
Description:
Internal error: The directory replication agent
But can the PF Folder assistant still access the GAL? Strikes me that it
shouldn't be able to, much like Inbox Assistant/Rules Wizard rules can't.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
Looks like a name resolution error. When you added the 2nd server into the
existing site, didnt you get some error messages?
Try adding the names of the other Exch server into each respective server's
hosts files.
RPCPing is also your friend.
- Original Message -
From: dave [EMAIL
Actually, a reasonable compromise for Antigen users is to disable notifications for
worm senders, which includes all the sender spoofing mass mailers, but enable
notifications for virus senders, which covers the macro viruses that still turn up
sporadically.
-Peter
-Original Message-
Running Trends ScanMail, so we don't have an option to send notifications
based on virus type. Good idea though!
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Use the flag
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
2
Sorry for the semi off topic post.
Would anyone who is the administrator of a Mail Marshall service, please
contact me off list.
I'm looking for some real - world information about it's operation and
reliability.
Thanks.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.
Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up
in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a
crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in
If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I was explained that
Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not
Have the boss just set the reminder flag for Follow up on the e-mail with
the date/time for 20 minutes hence. It should pop up if the other guy is
using Outlook.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on
the desktop informing of the important email?
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I
can give him what he wants.
Will pry further.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said it wasn't possible. Case
close, it's not worth waiting the time on.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Wasting...damn spell checker :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said it
Outlook 2003 will make this possible (as well as user specified sounds,
etc.), current versions do not. He will have to wait.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 15:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi all,
I need a brain refresh...
here is the scenario:
there is an Exchange 2000 server (server A) that only holds users' maiboxes,
it does not have a PF store.
there are two Exchange 2000 servers (server C and server D) with PF stores.
All the servers are in the same Admin group and in the
Right Click Database and look at the box that says default public folder
server.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi all,
I need a brain refresh...
here is the scenario:
there is an
You have any opening there? This sounds like the kind of boss I would
*love* to work for. :-)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I was
10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on
Windows XP ? - one attendee joking
** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
tell him you need to upgrade to E2K3 and OLK2K3. It has cool flags and rules
for better message management. Then you could use OMI to alert him on his
mobile device.
You will need one as well ;-P
- John Q Jr.
From: Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Make him carry a pager...wire it too him so it can shock him.
write a rule that forwards e-mails from identified VIPS to the pager.
thus he will know about it when it forwards to the pagerprovided you
wire him correctly..
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL
That was my first thought. The Default PF store is set up correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question about public folders
Right Click Database and look at the box that
9. What the hell died in there?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on
Windows XP ? - one attendee joking
** Please
8. *snore* *mumbling..*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
9. What the hell died in there?
-Original
Once I had a hairy migration from 5.5 to 2000.
I could not do an in-place migration because 5.5 server was the only one
that the organization had.
when I installed a new Exchange 2000 server and joined it to the existing
5.5 org, everything seemed to work fine, but in the end the 5.5 server was
8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM
Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
9. What the hell died in there?
-Original
7. Is that a Blackberry in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here?
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
) 425.681.4190
2 425.793.6000
-Original Message-
But does it come with Scharff in box?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes
Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which
I have Exchange 2000 running on a Win2k Server that is also the Active
Directory Domain controller. I was the admin of the server but I can no
longer administer Exchange for some reason. I checked the Exchange
Administration Delegation Wizard but it says I'm an Exchange Full
Administrator. I
6. Just how many Exchange Administrators does it take to fill Room D171/175
? Or, lets see what happens when we schedule our most popular Exchange
sessions in the smallest rooms?
This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
from
totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for
Exchange? :)
This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
from MailFrontier, Inc.
totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for
Exchange? :)
This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
from MailFrontier, Inc.
They may want the talent, not the product.
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:50 PM
Subject: OT: Another MS move
totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
Any predicitions on
Sorry for the dupe, but I got an error on delivery the first time . . .
guess you cannot trust those dang things! :)
This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com
- Original Message
Ex2K3 sp1
;)
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: MS Purchase
totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV
Exchange 2000 RTM.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: MS Purchase
Ex2K3 sp1
;)
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry william - rtm? Not read the manual?
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MS Purchase
Exchange 2000 RTM.
- Original Message -
From: Steve
Release to manufacturing
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Purchase
Sorry william - rtm? Not read the manual?
themolk.
-Original
Jim,
if this is an AD DC and you are the administrator of the local machine, then
you are possibly a domain admin (since the local machine doesnt actually
have a local security database, its the DC). Same for local groups, it wont
have any.
Domain Admins are denied access to mailboxes, and a
You have to be THIS tall to ride the...
Oh, wait - wrong thread :)
-Original Message-
From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
But does it come with Scharff in box?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From:
Van Hooser?
Whoda thunk?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Van Hooser, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes
But does it come with Scharff in box?
Chuck
Hi all,
Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore one office in Sri
Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them
built in One forest or Two trusted forest. What wil be the pro con...
Any suggestion
Thanks
One forest is easier for administration. It is not easy to share Exchange GALs
between organisations in different forests.
-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest
One forest is easier for administration. Will it makes Sri Lanka rely on HQ
to run? Touch wood, if all DCs in Singapore down, then Sri Lanka will be
affected? Maybe down for several hrs still can do, but if 2-3 days?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL
Oh! So you mean that DC in SL can still able to run if SG's DCs are down?
Even for several days?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest
So
Yes it will run indefinitely in the absence of other DCs ... just make sure you make
it a Global Catalog server as well.
-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
