I have it all sent to my mailbox.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discuss
Does the users have a e-mail address for their phone?
I have a nextel phone that I can send a message to using
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and all is good.
Use the rules wizard in outlook to create a server side rule.
Look here for some examples: http://www.slipstick.com/rules/index.htm
- David
-
Hi all
can anyone tell me how i can send a sms alert to a user's phone when there
is a new mail in his mail box on exhange 2000 server.
Thanks,
Maruthi
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interfa
There are a few options for users stuck on earlier versions of Outlook:
WYB (www.grinningshark.com) has an addin that strips html
outlook 2002 has a readasplain key
Chilton preview doesn't render html.
I recommend Chilton - it's donationware and doesn't screw up the html for
the messages you wa
Latest build for Ex2000 from Symantec will install on 2K3 (though if you
enable content filter it faults and restarts a lot). For now though at least
it is something. Previous versions didn't even install. Although they won't
support it, obviously they have an "unofficial" change of heart.
-O
What antivirus solutions are available either for purchase or download or in
beta?
I looked at Trend, Sybari and Symantec, but didn't find any product
references to Exchange 2003.
I did see on Symantec site the url for the Beta for Symantec Mail Security
for Microsoft Exchange. Anyone tried this
Or you could upgrade to outlook 11 which does that out of the box by
blocking external content
My $0.02 :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PF: Exchange
Sent: 17 July 2003 22:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking the Emails
Hi All,
FYI: Didn't get any replies so I rang PSS to see if it's going to be resolved.
Apparently not "this is an informational only field" strange as it appeared to
work in mixed mode...but then again maybe that was using Ex 5.5.
Cheers,
Phil
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil
Now wouldn't it be nice to have an addin for Outlook that replaced all
external content in a HTML message with blank graphics?
Sometimes it's nice to be able to see the HTML formatted correctly, but
not send back a "flag" saying your email address is valid.
Maybe and Exchange Event sink to do th
Implement something like http://www.attachstor.com/ perhaps...
-Original Message-
From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:25 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco
Unified Messaging
Subject: Ba
I'm trying to figure out how to back up Exchange Servers WITHOUT backing up voice
mails placed into Exchange by Cisco's Unified Messaging (UM).
I had thought of routing messaging from the UM to a separate store - creating a
secondary mailbox for each user - say, John User (juser) and John User -
Ok I suggested it.
Because from what I read, they want to always send mail to the same destination in a
secure way ("We want to send reports to the
State that contain information about our students")
In order to use PKI encryption, they would have to ask the recipient to obtain a
certificate fi
I don't believe you can.
David Sengupta
-Original Message-
From: Bernard Chouinard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Details Templates Exchange 2000
In system manager under Recipients, Details Templates, English, User,
Te
I was thinking that as well, just not sure where to look and we can
receive and send mail to everyone so if it's something strange with my
IMS then it's my IMS having a grudge against kpafilms.com
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17,
Then you've got something strange going on with your IMS.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July
That's one of the ways that spammers are getting around content filters -
using HTML formatted docs with embedded images of words which are commonly
blocked.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
In system manager under Recipients, Details Templates, English, User,
Template, Add, Edit how do I add an attribute in the Field pick list.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://in
Yeps, you are right, you did suggest gnp, I just read the thread and thought
WHAT, WHY?!? and responded to the last message, it wasn't meant to be a
response to your message but to the thread. :)
There are numerous ways to do this but TLS would not be my first choice.
-Patrick
-Original Mess
I didn't suggest it, I said it was an option. I suggested using GPG to
encrypt it.
It is a good point, though. TLS is a PITA to setup, and doesn't actually
secure the e-mail once it arrives. GPG is much easier to use, and more
secure, in that the message can only be seen by the intended recipie
Or, if it's always sent as an attachment, PKzip v6.0 is pretty good and a lot easier
than setting up email encryption. Of course, there is the hassle of zipping the file,
exchanging the password with the recipient and knowing that only the attachment is
encrypted.
Paul Chinnery
Network Adminis
Ok, maybe I've had a few too many beers but why in the world is everybody
suggesting TLS. It's a bother to set up and you have to do it with every
mail server you want to have secure communications with. Great, the
communications are secure but how about the actual e-mail? Correct me if I'm
wrong
Use Outlook 2003 :) Except not on porn that comes to public folders - MS
refuses to block images in posts - they say it was a bug that it worked in
earlier beta builds.
When the images are included in the message, use autopreview to instead of
preview pane scan for spam to delete.
We're doing
Blackhole the sites at your router. It's a courtesy issue to notify the
admins for the IP block. The images almost always link back to the sites
and are not imbedded in the images themselves.
--
be - MOS
If God dropped acid, would he see people? -- Steven Wright
> -Original Message-
I should say, is able to receive mail form all other domains but ours.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
That makes perfect sense James...thanks for the info
Kpafilms however does rece
That makes perfect sense James...thanks for the info
Kpafilms however does receive mail from all other domains but our's
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured send
Ok...I feel like a dunce. Microsoft Networking Client had been removed.
Will
-Original Message-
From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity
The plot thickens. I cannot browse my netw
The plot thickens. I cannot browse my network. The Network Identification
in the System Properties says I am in my Domain (please no J. Seinfeld
references) not in a Comcast workgroup. But the Network ID and Properties
buttons are grayed out and there is a note saying "The identification of the
It doesn't matter whether the host is up and not accepting SMTP connections
or completely down. The sending mail server will try the next highest MX
record. The only time a sending mail server will give up is if NONE of the
MXs are available and the retry period is up, OR if it receives an actual
sounds good... H (going away to ponder again)
-Original Message-
From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity
I get a NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table and mac address with the
I get a NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table and mac address with the nbtstat
-A to the Ex server's IP address.
Will
-Original Message-
From: Jim Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Connectivity
Did the com
Right that's where I get the 500 internal error. So I know the ODBC dll
and ODBC Driver manger are reported different versions but I did not
think this would stop an asp page from opening. I checked the MS mdac
download page but I do not know which one to download??!!
-Original Message-
Fr
go to the actual server itself, bring up a browser http://localhost see what happens.
If that doesn't work need to look at IIS
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5
I Unders
Let's go back to the MX record:
kpafilms.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.kpafilms.com
(This server is fine)
kpafilms.comMX preference = 5, mail exchanger = mi.kpafilms.com
(server is not down...it is just refusing connections on port 25, so it's
not going to roll over to the
I Understand Just wondering why the default.asp page will not run.
Not from OWA just from the default web server. Usually I would test the
web portion before moving on to OWA!
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Excha
Did the comcast guy enable any port blocking? Can you nbtstat -A to the exchange
servers IP address and see the results?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Connectivity
sounds like a DNS issue
From: "William E. Grever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Outlook Connectivity
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:13:50 -0400
I have one user with a laptop configured to connect to my Ex
Is the SMTP server on mail.kpafilms.com configured to accept mail for the
kpafilms.com domain? This could very well be their problem.
The internal names would more affect you receiving mail from them (and it
being blocked by aggressive anti-spam settings). For the most part, it
should be okay.
I have one user with a laptop configured to connect to my Exchange 5.5 sp3
server. All was working well until this user had a Comcast tech. set up her
laptop to connect with her new cable modem. Now Outlook does not appear to
see the LAN connection back at the office. As soon as I try to connect
If the sending and receiving mail servers, as well as any in-between support
it, TLS is an option.
Personally, I'd encrypt the e-mails using GnuPG. www.gnupg.org
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
Since we're on the subject, what have people been doing to counteract
the p*rn messages their receiving that have images embedded in them?
Just set up a block on the address or anyone have a more inventive
solution?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
James, appreciate you trying to think of a solution. It could be anyone emailing to
work from home in our organization from personal email address. Guess I will have to
try for a subject block, so far these emails have been about home loans.
The spammers are sure getting clever. The message in t
If IIS was not installed when you installed Exchange, OWA did not get installed.
Look at your IIS manager. Do you see the Exchange virtual directory? If not then it
is not installed.
As with any piece of software, always reinstall the latest service pack after running
the install. It won't h
Ok if I do this Do I need to rerun the exchange sp4? I think I am still
missing something because IIS should not give me the internal 500 error
When I try to open the web by ip address. The default web site should
open if I'm not mistaken!!
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EM
the way I look at it..is IF i load anything new on a server then I should
figure I need to re service pack it.
especially anything which interacts that tightly with the OS
actually you didnt need to bother with the 2.0 then 3.0 to 4.0
you could have jumped right to 4.0 on the option pack.
2 cen
Reinstall SP6, then run the exchange setup again and select only the OWA option(custom
install)
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa exchange 5.5
You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after lo
You mean I have to reinstall SP6 after loading NT 4.0 option pack. Are
the ODBC drives and dll on sp6? I Did reinstall SP6 after we installed
IIS 2.0 which gave me IIS 3.0 and then to IIS 4.0.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2
Transport Level Security or Transport Layer Security (sorry I am too
lazy to look up the exact definition)
You can setup the SMTP Virtual server to use TLS. And the receiving SMTP
server should be also set up to use TLS. You assign a digital
certificate to both of them, just like when you set up S
I've got a script that does that: (link might wrap)
http://www.wiredeuclid.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&r
eq=viewarticle&artid=2&page=1
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
Yes...Exchange version? I'll assume 5.5, since that's the only one I can
address.
With Ex5.5, in the properties of your IMS, Connections tab, Message
filtering... button, add your domain name in there. You would add
@luminet.net.
If you are connected via VPN/dial-up, then you are connected inte
Yeah, just only put proxyaddresses in the CSV header
Then you will need to parse the exported file and remove non-SMTP
addresses (like X.400, MSMAIL, etc.)
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is there any possible way to block the spam emails that show you in the from? That is
block and still be able to send from home account to work account.
Bill Kuhl
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.ht
Yes.
Use the header.exe tool to create your .csv file and the Directory Export
option within the Exchange Admin program.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Address Lists
To kee
Another possibility is using pgp or certificates to encrypt the e-mail you
send.
-Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17. heinäkuuta 2003 17:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Have a look at MS Q
For some reason my Exchange 2k server isn't sending NDR reports to external senders
when they try to send an e-mail with an attachment larger then what is allowed.
Instead of getting an NDR it just sits in the senders mail server until it times out a
couple of days later.
Could I be missing a
To keep a long story short, I need to try and export all the SMTP addresses
out of our Exchange 5.5
Server in to some type of Excel Spreadsheet/Word Document/whatever file.
Can this be done without
exporting a bunch of unnecessary data, or can it be done at all?
Thanks!
Robert
*** CONFIDENTIALI
However you have to make the election up front. So when you buy the CAL you
have to determine whether is will be for the device or for a client. For
instance I use Outlook on my desktop, on my laptop and on my computer at
home. I only need one license to the same mailbox on the Exchange server.
Have a look at MS Q319267
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 July 2003 15:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
what is TLS? Sorry if this is a stupid question.
:)
Sam
-Original Message-
From
No she does not. Come to find out, she doesn't use the exchange server
at all, so at least I can rule that out.
It is an IMAP connection to another server. I'm thinking it's a client
issue but I can't pinpoint the problem
Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
Does have any delegates setup?
From: "Boynton, Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: On behalf of ...
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:06:54 -0400
I have an outlook user who all of a sudden started getting al
I though I would throw this out there - we have experienced problems when applying SP4
for Windows 2000 on our Exchange 2000 server (another identically configured Exchange
server was not affected by the SP4 update). After applying the SP, the server seemed
to run fine but eventually ran out of
I have an outlook user who all of a sudden started getting all her mail
delivered to her on behalf of the sender. For example, when I send her
mail, it shows up in her mailbox and the from field has On Behalf of
Todd Boynton and the mail body is empty.
This is the only thing left in the body:
hrm... guess I didn't get that from the original note.
sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox recovery E2K
Yes but he wanted to know if the hardware just plain went out t
what is TLS? Sorry if this is a stupid question.
:)
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
TLS works like SSL, only for SMTP
Sincerely,
more info I gleaned from their IT guy:
Mi.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns
name of KPAMIS01.kpafilms.com
Mail.kpafilms.com is the MX record for the server with an internal dns
name of EXCBD01.kpafilms.com
Because the MX recs and the actual machine names don't matc
Some of these things are easier done with mailboxes than PFs.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail
TLS works like SSL, only for SMTP
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the I
Yes but he wanted to know if the hardware just plain went out the door. No
OS no nothing. He just wanted to use the exsisting email servers still up to
take up the slack until th recovery process could take place. It's a long
story but that what you get for having someone else maintain your syst
We take an approach that may work for you...We have a recovery domain
(restore.domain.com) and of course the production domain of domain.com
When a mailbox server in domain.com goes down, the following occurs.
1. Diagnose the cause of the failure and repair this cause (for
example, replace the h
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
Outlook 2000 and XP clients
Hello All.
I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the
State that contain information about our students. The information
contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and priva
After thinking about it, you are right. If the server does go down and you
delete and create a new mailbox on another server the profile would have to
be changed or recreated. The reason they wanted to do this was to reduce
email outages while the DR team recovered the old mail and made it avail
Not $username - $ is the prompt
And I forgot, its not username, its user
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assuming you have installed IIS by default as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: IMS stops working after Windows 2000 installed on Bridgehead
> Yep.
Sorry, I don't get that ???
Why $UserName when telnetting ? It doesn't work
Am I missing something ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2003 13:07
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> Could that be because the proper syntax
Could that be because the proper syntax is:
$telnet mail-server-IP 110
+OK Microsoft Exchange POP3 server version 5.5.2654.50 ready
$UserName domain\user\exchangealias
As is I believe clearly spelled out in the FAQ?
--
Roger D. Seie
74 matches
Mail list logo
