http://www.softwareshelf.com/products/promodag.asp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Monitoring Internet email traffic per user/mailbox
Hi,
just w
Hi,
just wondering if anyone knows of a way to monitor MSX5.5 Internet email
traffic based on each mailbox. Something tabular or graph based would be
ideal, just so we can see what sort of MB each user is sending/revieving
over a time frame. Only concerned with Internet traffic (since internally
it
I am using outlook 2000, I usually take backup of PST after it is near to 1 Gig. what
office version are you using?
Irf.
-Original Message-
From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST-file backup problem
H
Further to the below, I have noticed that although the initial folder
replication stops short of the mark, any changes made to either copy of
the public folder (the incomplete copy or the original full copy)
replicate to each other. This includes modifying records that were not
replicated initially
I found that there is a way to force the SMTP server to send ALL email on another
port, but not for a particular domain. If you set it to a nonstandard port, it makes
the SMTP relay useless for outgoing email, but it does allow the two to work together.
I haven't check Windows Server 2003, perha
Did you ever find a solution to this problem? I've been scouring the
internet and have not found anything. I'm betting there's a secret
registry setting that allows you to configure the outbound port used by
the Windows 2000 smtp service, but I can't find documentation anywhere.
Help would be ap
If an SMTP host accepts a message from a client or another SMTP server for
ultimate delivery to an e-mail domain for which it is not authorized to
accept mail, and then it forwards that mail to an appropriate SMTP server
for that domain, then that SMTP host is relaying.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MV
The third-party tool you need is Microsoft Exchange Server. Leave the mail
there. Back it up in one place.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Funny, I was thinking about Sybari Antigen. I think this problem can occur
with many versions of many vendors' products.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAI
I have posted before about my issue with several public folders not getting
replicated (or not flipping the bit to indicate they have replicated
perhaps?) properly from my old server to my new server as I try to complete
a much too elongated ECMSM server upgrade. I have only gotten responses from
o
I give up.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thr
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread. I certainly have learned
a lot.
I see that I had an incorrect understanding of "relay". I thought "relay"
was defined as one SMTP server sending mail to another server for purposes
of forwarding that mail on to its final destination. I did not
Obviously you've skimmed over a lot of details, but overall that method
will work just fine.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PATRICK,
MARTIN
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003 In
Don't forget to rehome the system folders (Free/Busy and OAB) before you
remove the original 2000 server.
-Original Message-
From: PATRICK, MARTIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003 Inplace Upgrade?
I need t
I need to upgrade my Exchange 2000 SP3 installation to Exchange 2003.
My plan is to install a second Front-End server with existing E2K 2000
box. The new FE will be Windows 2003/Exchange 2003. I will then
install a new Windows 2003/Exchange 2003 Back-End server in my E2K site.
After that, I will
I just got my hands on it a few days ago. Overall it seems like a great
product. I think I still like Sybari Antigen better, but Symantec Mail
Security has some nice features too.
Anyway, Symantec Mail Security gets installed ON the Exchange server.
I have had problems with it totally ignoring in
I might be slightly biased on this one ... but KVS offers the Discovery
Accelerator (http://www.kvsplc.com/EnterpriseVaultDiscoveryAccelerator.asp)
which will do excactly what you are looking for.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
w
Thanks Martin.
> That should be sufficient. Stop the System Attendant which should stop
> everything else.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:27 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Removing 1st Exchange Serve
That should be sufficient. Stop the System Attendant which should stop
everything else.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing 1st Exchange Server
Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0
I'm using E
Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0
I'm using Ed's move server method and I'm at the point where I am going to
test and make sure I did everything correctly. MS article 152959
recommends disconnecting the old server from the network to confirm that
the procedure was followed correctly. My old Exchange box is my
Hi everyone, I;m new to exchange ready to deploy, and I just received Symantec mail
security for Exchange, unfortunate since we are non-profit, we do not get any support
from Symantec in any way shape or form, Can any recommend a good practice for using
Mail
Security, as far as installing it on t
Does anyone know of an app that can search any email in the database and
report on content of the message?
Basically if I want to find all messages from all users that have the word
"Microsoft" in a message the tool will either show me the message or show
me who has the message.
Joshua Mor
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317327
or
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317680
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System w
You scroll down until you find the links you told Arlo wouldn't work,
and click on them.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Gregory Householder
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sy
How would you do an event sink?
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature
If they want internal signatures they will have t
Probably for the same reason we in I/S are being slowly pressured into it: herd
instinct.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
If they want internal signatures they will have to spend some money for
something like Nemx.
If they want external, you can use the free event sink.
So I would ask them what the budget is on this and take it from there.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Its just a question that was asked of my from the big guys.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature
You want disclaimers
You want disclaimers on internal mail? Why?
- Original Message -
From: "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: System wide signature
Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook
Nemx Power tools for exchange
www.nemx.com
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: System wide signature
Thanks for the information, but we are using
You're welcome!
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question
Thanks for the information and the tip. I had found the same information in
the MSKB and used it
Last week I posting to this list about SMTP between our
current E2K server and newly installed (into the same
organisation and routing group) E2K3 cluster.
That problem is that when sending from an E2K mailbox
via MAPI or OWA the message appears to be queued
for the E2K3 cluster and leave that qu
Thanks for the information and the tip. I had found the same information in the MSKB
and used it to get the store mounted and do some housecleaning.
Thanks...Ray
Thought for the day:
A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who
makes a desi
You need to ask yourself a couple of questions.
Why are you using PST files? Obviously you are using Exchange, so where is
the benefit in using PST files? Is keeping them on a file server cheaper
than keeping them on an Exchange server? Disk space costs the same on both.
If it's a standard vs. ent
You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll assume you're
using Exchange.
If you're concerned about storage space and the data contained in the PST
files is important enough to be backed up, you should keep that data managed
by Exchange in a Store. Backup is easier, and you wi
Hello !
My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files you always have to back up
every PST-file. This is because Outlook changes the file every time it's opened etc.
So you cannot take just incremental from changed files. Usually you end up backing up
all PST-files.. Ok.. so what
If your using Trend-Micro as your Virus scanner, on my last assignment they
had a simular issue. It ended up on how Trend was setup. After tweaking
settings the relay server never locked up again. Took almost a month to
track down.
From: "Mark Dewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Dis
I think there is confusion is over closed Relay and an open Relay. If you
want you mail to go anywhere outside you domain then it must relay, but if
you must authenticate to do it then it is a closed relay.
Earthlink obviously operate a closed relay, as they should :)
Later
Ali
- Original M
Exactly my point. Jim is saying it's NOT relaying if the client
authenticates, and I'm saying otherwise. If the SMTP server doesn't own
the domain you're sending to, then it acts as a relay, period.
Regardless of how the client connects.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
We use UNIX boxes as our main email gateway/smarthost. Messages are routed
to/from our back end exchange boxes to the unix boxes via an exchange 2003
front end server (which handles the anti-virus and anti-spam filtering). This
configuration means that the unix boxes deal with all routing issues an
I think Ed must have had a bad day!! Try looking at the IIS authentication
settings of your back-end servers (possibly front-end as well) and set the
authentication to disable anonymous and enable Integrated Windows and/or
Basic (and set the domain).
Regards
Brian
*
The 16GB limit applies to the size of the EDB and STM files added
together.
Also, see this:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/09/temporarily_inc.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Posted At: 11 November 2003
looks like isb.paknet.com.pk isn't configured to accept mail for
mul.paknet.com.pk even though it's listed as an MX record.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> Fr
My Dear List, I am getting this error from external domain which is @mul.paknet.com.pk.
"The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific
reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system
administrator.
"
Can you please he
That is a valid point as your streaming file does form part of that
store. Dismounting the store should be enough to get the correct size.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 09:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Informat
Hmmm. Exchange services running but the store was dismounted. Do I need all services
stopped to get accurate size or just STORE.EXE?
What about the priv.stm file? I noticed that adding it to the EDB file was just over
16GB. Should I be looking there also?
Thanks...Ray
Thought
You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or
stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file size.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 08:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Size Questio
47 matches
Mail list logo