RE: Information Store Size Question

You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file size. Sander -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 November 2003 08:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store Size

RE: Information Store Size Question

Hmmm. Exchange services running but the store was dismounted. Do I need all services stopped to get accurate size or just STORE.EXE? What about the priv.stm file? I noticed that adding it to the EDB file was just over 16GB. Should I be looking there also? Thanks...Ray

RE: Information Store Size Question

That is a valid point as your streaming file does form part of that store. Dismounting the store should be enough to get the correct size. Sander -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 November 2003 09:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

rcpthosts

My Dear List, I am getting this error from external domain which is @mul.paknet.com.pk. The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. SMTP #5.0.0 smtp; 553

RE: rcpthosts

looks like isb.paknet.com.pk isn't configured to accept mail for mul.paknet.com.pk even though it's listed as an MX record. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-

RE: Information Store Size Question

The 16GB limit applies to the size of the EDB and STM files added together. Also, see this: http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/09/temporarily_inc.html Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Posted At: 11 November

RE: OWA Front/back end in Cluster

I think Ed must have had a bad day!! Try looking at the IIS authentication settings of your back-end servers (possibly front-end as well) and set the authentication to disable anonymous and enable Integrated Windows and/or Basic (and set the domain). Regards Brian

RE: smtp receives but stops sending

We use UNIX boxes as our main email gateway/smarthost. Messages are routed to/from our back end exchange boxes to the unix boxes via an exchange 2003 front end server (which handles the anti-virus and anti-spam filtering). This configuration means that the unix boxes deal with all routing issues

RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5

Exactly my point. Jim is saying it's NOT relaying if the client authenticates, and I'm saying otherwise. If the SMTP server doesn't own the domain you're sending to, then it acts as a relay, period. Regardless of how the client connects. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5

I think there is confusion is over closed Relay and an open Relay. If you want you mail to go anywhere outside you domain then it must relay, but if you must authenticate to do it then it is a closed relay. Earthlink obviously operate a closed relay, as they should :) Later Ali - Original

RE: smtp receives but stops sending

If your using Trend-Micro as your Virus scanner, on my last assignment they had a simular issue. It ended up on how Trend was setup. After tweaking settings the relay server never locked up again. Took almost a month to track down. From: Mark Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange

PST-file backup problem

Hello ! My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files you always have to back up every PST-file. This is because Outlook changes the file every time it's opened etc. So you cannot take just incremental from changed files. Usually you end up backing up all PST-files.. Ok.. so what

RE: PST-file backup problem

You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll assume you're using Exchange. If you're concerned about storage space and the data contained in the PST files is important enough to be backed up, you should keep that data managed by Exchange in a Store. Backup is easier, and you

RE: PST-file backup problem

You need to ask yourself a couple of questions. Why are you using PST files? Obviously you are using Exchange, so where is the benefit in using PST files? Is keeping them on a file server cheaper than keeping them on an Exchange server? Disk space costs the same on both. If it's a standard vs.

RE: Information Store Size Question

Thanks for the information and the tip. I had found the same information in the MSKB and used it to get the store mounted and do some housecleaning. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a

E2K services stopping

Last week I posting to this list about SMTP between our current E2K server and newly installed (into the same organisation and routing group) E2K3 cluster. That problem is that when sending from an E2K mailbox via MAPI or OWA the message appears to be queued for the E2K3 cluster and leave that

RE: Information Store Size Question

You're welcome! -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question Thanks for the information and the tip. I had found the same information in the MSKB and used

Re: System wide signature

Nemx Power tools for exchange www.nemx.com /Peter - Original Message - From: Gregory Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM Subject: RE: System wide signature Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook

RE: System wide signature

You want disclaimers on internal mail? Why? - Original Message - From: Gregory Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM Subject: RE: System wide signature Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook and

RE: System wide signature

Its just a question that was asked of my from the big guys. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature You want disclaimers

RE: System wide signature

If they want internal signatures they will have to spend some money for something like Nemx. If they want external, you can use the free event sink. So I would ask them what the budget is on this and take it from there. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: System wide signature

Probably for the same reason we in I/S are being slowly pressured into it: herd instinct. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: System wide signature

How would you do an event sink? Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System wide signature If they want internal signatures they will have

RE: System wide signature

You scroll down until you find the links you told Arlo wouldn't work, and click on them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System

RE: System wide signature

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317327 or http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317680 -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System

Searching the Database

Does anyone know of an app that can search any email in the database and report on content of the message? Basically if I want to find all messages from all users that have the word Microsoft in a message the tool will either show me the message or show me who has the message. Joshua

symantec mail security

Hi everyone, I;m new to exchange ready to deploy, and I just received Symantec mail security for Exchange, unfortunate since we are non-profit, we do not get any support from Symantec in any way shape or form, Can any recommend a good practice for using Mail Security, as far as installing it on

Removing 1st Exchange Server

Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0 I'm using Ed's move server method and I'm at the point where I am going to test and make sure I did everything correctly. MS article 152959 recommends disconnecting the old server from the network to confirm that the procedure was followed correctly. My old Exchange box is my

RE: Removing 1st Exchange Server

That should be sufficient. Stop the System Attendant which should stop everything else. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing 1st Exchange Server Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0 I'm using

RE: Removing 1st Exchange Server

Thanks Martin. That should be sufficient. Stop the System Attendant which should stop everything else. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing 1st Exchange Server

Re: Searching the Database

I might be slightly biased on this one ... but KVS offers the Discovery Accelerator (http://www.kvsplc.com/EnterpriseVaultDiscoveryAccelerator.asp) which will do excactly what you are looking for. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org

RE: symantec mail security

I just got my hands on it a few days ago. Overall it seems like a great product. I think I still like Sybari Antigen better, but Symantec Mail Security has some nice features too. Anyway, Symantec Mail Security gets installed ON the Exchange server. I have had problems with it totally ignoring

Exchange 2003 Inplace Upgrade?

I need to upgrade my Exchange 2000 SP3 installation to Exchange 2003. My plan is to install a second Front-End server with existing E2K 2000 box. The new FE will be Windows 2003/Exchange 2003. I will then install a new Windows 2003/Exchange 2003 Back-End server in my E2K site. After that, I

RE: Exchange 2003 Inplace Upgrade?

Don't forget to rehome the system folders (Free/Busy and OAB) before you remove the original 2000 server. -Original Message- From: PATRICK, MARTIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 Inplace Upgrade? I need

RE: Exchange 2003 Inplace Upgrade?

Obviously you've skimmed over a lot of details, but overall that method will work just fine. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PATRICK, MARTIN Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003

RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread. I certainly have learned a lot. I see that I had an incorrect understanding of relay. I thought relay was defined as one SMTP server sending mail to another server for purposes of forwarding that mail on to its final destination. I did not

RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5

I give up. Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Underwood Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5 Thanks to everyone who contributed to this

public folder replication problem persists

I have posted before about my issue with several public folders not getting replicated (or not flipping the bit to indicate they have replicated perhaps?) properly from my old server to my new server as I try to complete a much too elongated ECMSM server upgrade. I have only gotten responses from

RE: smtp receives but stops sending

Funny, I was thinking about Sybari Antigen. I think this problem can occur with many versions of many vendors' products. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PST-file backup problem

The third-party tool you need is Microsoft Exchange Server. Leave the mail there. Back it up in one place. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5

If an SMTP host accepts a message from a client or another SMTP server for ultimate delivery to an e-mail domain for which it is not authorized to accept mail, and then it forwards that mail to an appropriate SMTP server for that domain, then that SMTP host is relaying. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet

Re: SMTP relay to a nonstandard port

Did you ever find a solution to this problem? I've been scouring the internet and have not found anything. I'm betting there's a secret registry setting that allows you to configure the outbound port used by the Windows 2000 smtp service, but I can't find documentation anywhere. Help would be

RE: SMTP relay to a nonstandard port

I found that there is a way to force the SMTP server to send ALL email on another port, but not for a particular domain. If you set it to a nonstandard port, it makes the SMTP relay useless for outgoing email, but it does allow the two to work together. I haven't check Windows Server 2003,

re: Public folder incomplete replication

Further to the below, I have noticed that although the initial folder replication stops short of the mark, any changes made to either copy of the public folder (the incomplete copy or the original full copy) replicate to each other. This includes modifying records that were not replicated

RE: PST-file backup problem

I am using outlook 2000, I usually take backup of PST after it is near to 1 Gig. what office version are you using? Irf. -Original Message- From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST-file backup problem

Monitoring Internet email traffic per user/mailbox

Hi, just wondering if anyone knows of a way to monitor MSX5.5 Internet email traffic based on each mailbox. Something tabular or graph based would be ideal, just so we can see what sort of MB each user is sending/revieving over a time frame. Only concerned with Internet traffic (since internally

RE: Monitoring Internet email traffic per user/mailbox

http://www.softwareshelf.com/products/promodag.asp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitoring Internet email traffic per user/mailbox Hi, just