RE: outsource!?

2003-11-16 Thread Mark Arnold
You'll find that IBM are fully au-fait with all the security, regulatory, recovery and performance aspects. You are up against IBM who, along with EDS (Whom I just left), CGEY and a pile of others who have done this inside out and upside down and more times than you've had hot dinners. Put all, and

Re: Site connector question

2003-11-16 Thread Tony Hlabse
Don't snip the thread. Well I suppose you could add a server at the remote site.. Make sure you have a GC there as well. But if you have enough bandwidth available you don't have too. It all depends on the users needs. Not enough info to make a solid decision. From: "Kevin Dietz" <[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Site connector question

2003-11-16 Thread Kevinm[MVP]
What was the question///? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Site connector question My answer is 200. I will hav

RE: Site connector question

2003-11-16 Thread Kevin Dietz
What are those factores. I do not want my users to have an Outlook experience as if they were accessing it online over a 40K dialup connection. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface

Re: Site connector question

2003-11-16 Thread Kevin Dietz
My answer is 200. I will have Outlook published in a Citrix farm at this remote location. 200 people will access outlook from that site. The Outlook application will be published on Terminal Servers (Citrix). From the servers Outlook will need to find an exchange server 1 of which is at my corporat

RE: outsource!?

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Blackstone
Save money... -Original Message- From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outsource!? Is that all??? Or do they want better service, less heads, more features, more stability? They want rid of current staff

RE: outsource!?

2003-11-16 Thread Kevinm[MVP]
Is that all??? Or do they want better service, less heads, more features, more stability? They want rid of current staff and practices? All kinds of reasons. One would need to know what they are in order to be best show them as wrong. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message--

RE: outsource!?

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Blackstone
The same thing they all expect. To save money. -Original Message- From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 6:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outsource!? What is the CIO expecting to get out of this?? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP

RE: outsource!?

2003-11-16 Thread Kevinm[MVP]
What is the CIO expecting to get out of this?? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Hill Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outsource!? My CIO has asked me to a