Paul,
I'm probably overly paranoid, but I would not install MBSA on the
Exchange box. If memory serves me correctly, you can run this software
remotely and still gather the patch information. Avoid installing
Outlook on the server. You don't mention this, but I always install the
network monito
Everthing in IT is not vendor based. Just off the top of my head
A+ Certification
SANS GIAC
CISSP
These are all certifications that are not based on any vendor's
products.
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Active Active clustering
No, according to the theory you can get more users on Active/Active because both
cluster nodes are being used to do something useful. But if one fails, the other node
better be able to take on the load.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL
I also am staying the night in Anaheim.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions; Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Survivors at MEC
I am! If you hear anything shoot the lis
I've looked into Exchange Active/Passive clustering for our Exchange
2000 servers. The largest Exchange problem that causes downtime is
corruption in the database. I agree with Ed that clustering cannot help
in this senario. However, even with high quality hardware, you still
have to deal with
Simpler-Webb has a product called Exchange Resource Manager. (Also has
a really cool hat!)
Denny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edwards, Aaron
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Auto Accept Util
Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance.
This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server.
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday
It depends. How do you plan to use this array? If this array will store the Logs and
the Store, then I would configure the logs on a mirrored pair and create a RAID5 array
with the remaining files. (This is assuming your are only planning one storage group
on this 220s.)
Dennis Depp
I'll be there!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC
OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technolo
Eric,
Active Directory is a requirement for Exchange 2000. If you have no plans to move to
AD, then I would go with Ex 5.5.
Denny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchan
I am so sorry!
At 09:25 PM 8/30/2002 -0400, Chris H wrote:
>unfortunately I think it is my boss! :(
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Dennis Depp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, August 3
If Klez hit you through your default shares, you have a much bigger problem
-- Someone is running email with Administrator privledges. This person
needs to be found and removed from the administrator list! Either that or
shoot them!
Dennis
At 08:43 PM 8/30/2002 -0400, Chris H wrote:
>This i
Missy,
If you would not recommend clustering, what do you recommend for high
availablility environments?
Dennis Depp
At 11:17 AM 3/13/2002 -0500, missy koslosky wrote:
>While I'm really not into arguing the point, while some people at Compaq
>and/or MS might recommend A/A ov
Perhaps I'm being ignorant, but can't I split the priv database with
Exchange 2000? Doesn't this reduce the restore times?
Dennis Depp
At 12:55 PM 2/18/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
>One important factor to think about is restore time.
>How are you backing up? How
Am I missing something? When I read
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=kb;en-us;Q317173 I
still don't see where Microsoft supports NAS. Doesn't the NetApp appliance
look like a mapped drive to Exchange?
Denny
At 10:54 AM 2/12/2002 +0100, Martin Tuip wrote:
>That was my i
inal Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:57 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: haiku friday
>
>
>Phil,
>
>Please re-write line 2
>Hai-ku should be five sev-en five
>Your line is one short
>
>Denny
>
Obviously I am! Phil, I'm sorry for ever doubting you!
At 11:03 AM 2/8/2002 -0600, Hunter, Lori wrote:
>Huh? Are you counting differently than we are?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:57 AM
>T
Phil,
Please rewrite line 2
Haiku should be five seven five
Your line is one short
Denny
At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote:
>I have to ask you
>if there are any more jobs
>with cars where you work
>
>Lucky devil!
>
>Phil
>
>-
>Phil Randal
Joshua,
Did you have any problems with running Exchange on a NetApps box?
Denny
At 03:24 PM 2/5/2002 -0500, Morgan, Joshua wrote:
>I have run that type of environment but instead of Procom we had it on a
>NetApps box
>
>
>
>
>Joshua Morgan
>PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
>Fax: (413) 581-4936
>[EMA
Open only port 3389 and require High security. The usual mumbo jumbo about
keeping up to date on security patches is a must!
Denny
At 03:52 PM 2/1/2002 -0500, Phil wrote:
>Well the CEO does not want to VPN in first.
>So Terminal Services would work great but I do not want to put in out on the
We already have the Network Appliance. It was purchased for our Unix based
IMAP server, and then we found out our IMAP server would not support it.
Denny
At 11:45 AM 2/1/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Can you run the SW without the Network Appliance?
>
>-Original Message-
>From:
AM 2/1/2002 -0800, Martin Blackstone wrote:
>Ahhh. I think it can do that, but never tested for it.
>
>Call a rep. You should be able to get a demo unit. They brought one in for
>me, installed it, configed, and everything. I had it about 60 days
>
>-Original Message-
;-Original Message-
>From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:50 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Network Appliance SnapManager
>
>
>Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000? If so what are your
>thoughts on the product.
Is anyone using this product with Exchange 2000? If so what are your
thoughts on the product. What is the granularity of the restore?
Thanks
Dennis Depp
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Red no blue aaayy!!!
At 01:40 PM 1/29/2002 -0500, Andy David wrote:
>What is you favorite color?
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:37 PM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Restoring a exchange 2000 databa
25 matches
Mail list logo
