Hello,
In an effort to justify not having to do brick level backups, I want to
increase the Deleted Item Retention period to something like 30 days.
My concern is the impact that it could have on the size of the information
store. I realize it's impossible to tell precisely, but I was hoping to
item retention
Ken,
Users rarely delete items anyway (based on the 500+ hoarders I have!) so I
think you would not find any noticeable size increases...
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 November 2001 15:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
policy. All deleted email is kept for 30
days. After that point the mail is unrecoverable. Period.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jasa, Ken
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impact on Priv size
Except for Public Folders, the ADC should work fine. I replicate 3 separate
5.5 orgs with it.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: LDAP for Address books?
I'm thinking that the siste
Has anyone used Livevault? My company is looking at them as a potential
solution for all of our backups. I was skeptical.
Thanks,
Ken Jasa
Messaging Administrator
Weber Shandwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http:
: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Livevault backup software
Has anyone used Livevault? My company is looking at them as a potential
solution for all of our backups. I was skeptical.
Thanks,
Ken Jasa
Messaging
Virus?
-Original Message-
From: Phillip Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why Outlook establishes multiple connections to multiple Exchange
servers
This is the output from netstat -a. Why Outlook opens so many RPC
Non-authoritative answer:
netdoor.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = pike.netdoor.com
netdoor.com MX preference = 50, mail exchanger = rock.netdoor.com
I was able to coonect to pike.netdoor.com but not rock.netdoor.com on port
25.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [m
de account.
We are mail.mssc.state.ms.us
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jasa, Ken
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Testing
Non-authoritative answer:
netdoor.com MX prefer
Install the ExOLEDB provider on the web server.
-Original Message-
From: Lisa Horton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO
Our Exchange Server and Web Server are on different m
What are the privacy settings at on the Browsers? OWA won't work if they are
set to high.
-Original Message-
From: jonh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA access problem.
All IE clients 5.0 and up on the loca
Export - delete - create in new container - import.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing OBJ-Container
Is there a way in Exchange 5.5 sp4 to change a mailbox's OBJ-Containe
You should double check what rights you actually have.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Deleting Empty ABV's
[Darren Ash] I need to delete some emptry address book views
Goofy.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Sorry our admin proxys out microsoft.com, he says since they're criminals he
rates their site right up t
I am trying to get an X.400 connection working between a server in a
Exchange 5.5 Org and a Exchange 2000 server in an AD domain - all test
environment.
I am certain I have something misconfigured as I have the logging turn all
the way up and see "connection refused". I have tried matching passw
Hope your flame proof.
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restoration Solutions?
Alright, so what is the good backup solution for the Exchange databases?
We have not performed test
What are you using in your attempt to connect to the Exchange server over
the Internet?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access
Sorry for not being clear,
upgraded to 5.5
Somebody is seriously full of )#($
-Original Message-
From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access
Upgraded from 5.5 SP3
I checked for the static RPC ports and the dword entries for tcp/ip port
ar
Antonio,
Do you have an example of how to search the entire GAL at once? I have not
been able to find the way to do it.
TIA
Ken Jasa
Messaging Administrator
Weber Shandwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October
6 Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT4 sp6 servers in our site.
Any local DL I try to open takes a very long time to open - minutes.
Mailboxes open very quickly. I had to put server protect on those servers,
but made sure to exclude the exchange directories. I have stopped the Server
Protect services but still g
--
"They couldn't hit an elephant from this dist..." -The last words of US
General John Sedgwick.
---------
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:00 PM
To: Exchange
Hello,
I have been required to raise the message size limit on all connections to
20Mbs. We have already seen it cause problems across one of our links.
I know it is dependent on the bandwidth and hardware. I just wanted to get
some ideas of what size limits other companies are using.
Thanks.
first. I will be raising it in a bit
once people remember that they need to be reasonable in what they send (IE
the guy in accounting who tried to email a 98MB file to himself at home). I
am also curious to hear what people are limiting it to.
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Jasa
file to himself at home). I
am also curious to hear what people are limiting it to.
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 27, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reasonable message size limits
Hello,
I have been
?
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002
lot better than pulling a
number out of you know where.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reasonable message size limits
Hello,
I have been required to raise the
Hello,
I would be grateful to hear anyones opinion on spamassassin. I am in a
postion where I might be told to start using it.
Thanks,
Ken Jasa
Messaging Manager
Weber Shandwick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http:/
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/technologies/directory/mms/default.asp#
section1
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
But when it is out it will be available to the public? I do not n
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, May
27, 2003 9:47 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Synchronize separate E2K GAL's
Subject: Synchronize separate E2K GAL's
Hello,
It it possible to synchronize 2 separate E2K G
aucer
separation for operation
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Synchronize separate E2K GAL's
I forgot to mention I have no money to spend :-( I am looking forward to
the new
Outlook 2000
Exchange 5.5 SP4
VPN access over broadband.
We have a user with a computer at home they use to access their coporate
email. They are saying that messages that they have deleted in that Outlook
profile are not showing as deleted when they get back into the office. We
don't have the abi
It's still in beta, You can download the enterprise version from the MMS
website.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Evensen, Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I am trying to find MMS 2003, specifically the GAL sync tool. I under
All,
Part of our company is interested in using this product. I would appreciate
hearing some opinions of the product- particularly the spam portion.
Thanks.
Ken Jasa
Messaging Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
g for about a
month...only 3 false positives thus far. Easy to configure, self
maintainable whitelists if mail is configured to route out through
MailEssentials. 3 levels of detection that are customizablebeautiful
product
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm guessing we are talking two different versions of OWA here.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
huh? Could you elaborate a littleplease.
Go to IE
URL - owaserver/exchange/usernam
Hello,
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows NT SP6a
The distribution lists within one of my sites are very slow to open in
Exchange administrator. The mailboxes open just fine. I have turned off
the AV. The event logs do not show anything revealing. Not finding any
info on the web that is relevent.
Any ide
Test it out on yours and see what happens.
KJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juancho Ciocon
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello folks:
Happy Friday to all!
Native E2k/AD infrastructure; all patched a
Hello,
We are using TrendMicro Interscan 3.52 to deliver internet email. I have had
sporadic complaints from our staff that clients are getting multiple copies
of the same email - upto 15. I have talked to Trend about it and they say
that it is not a problem with their software.
Any ideas on h
I have one office that needs to have The html option checked and another
office that needs to have it as plain text. I can't base it on a per domain
basis.
My question is if you have both checked, will those clients that can't
recognize mime get the text version and those that can see the HTML
s the whole point of multipart/alternative.
- Original Message -
From: "Jasa, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:51 PM
Subject: Question regarding Q161044 - Multipart/Alternative
>
&g
You can use the alternate recipient under delivery options of the
mailbox to have a copy sent elsewhere - Joe won't have a clue.
KJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Scribner
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Exchange
Or maybe it was a filter...
This is a weird problem. I hope I have described it well enough for it
to make sense...
This site had 3 servers:
Server 1 - NT4 SP6A Echange 5.5 SP4 - set to be retired Server 2 - 2000
SP3 Echange 5.5 SP4 - Migrated from another domain using Move Server
Wizard. No P
public folder server
before retiring it?
Ed
--- "Jasa, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or maybe it was a filter...
>
>
> This is a weird problem. I hope I have described it well enough for it
> to make sense...
>
> This site had 3 servers:
>
> S
Hello,
Veritas 9 - were using version 8 and getting the same problem.
Exchange 5.5, NT4 SP6a
We can not seem to get better then 100 MB / minute backing up the
Exchange servers. using the Exchange agent. Many nights lately it is
much worse.
The NICs and ports on the switch have all be set to 100/
Discussions
What tape drive are you using?
- Original Message -
From: "Jasa, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:48 AM
Subject: Not using BLB, But getting really slow backups.
Hello,
Veri
bit under the device options.
I think the default is 32K.
- Original Message -
From: "Jasa, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: Not using BLB, But getting really slow
Why not just one shared calendar?
Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Martinez
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have received a request to add the dates our organization is off or
considered
What is the proper url to use on the client?
I have configured the server to allow mobile devices to sychronize with
the server and I have enabled my own mailbox to do so.
The only thing I see in the MS documentation is "enter the server to
synchronize with"
I can check email through owa us
I just tried it with a different address and got the confirmation email
right away.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Would any of you who have subscribed t
MS PSS only had me patch the OWA server and I have not had a problem
since.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Finch Brett
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2K3& Exchange 5.5 CDO Patch 26
50 matches
Mail list logo
