Hello

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
Yeah.. I'm back after 3.5 days of downtime thanks to AT&T and Excite communications. I HAD 3 static IP'sgone now and probably won't get any for another 3-4 weeks. I have been reduced to using DHCP assigned addresses. Had to reconfigure my firewall and my DNS. Could not get a call back from

RE: Hello

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello Yeah.. I'm back after 3.5 days of downtime thanks to AT&T and Excite communications. I HAD 3 static IP'sgone now and probably won't get any for another

RE: Hello

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
However, it sounds like they are charging me for the @Business name but I'm getting the same @Home service. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello My connection isnt

RE: Hello

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello However, it sounds like they are charging me for the @Business name but I'm getting the same @Home service. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [m

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
Here you go: (Sophos rules) EMERGENCY ALERT: W32/Goner-A worm spreading widely Sophos has received a number of reports of users receiving a new, in-the-wild, virus called W32/Goner-A. Sophos has issued protection against W32/Goner-A, and is recommending customers update their copies of Sop

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
I am. And, .vbs, .js, .htm, .html, .txt.vbs, etc. My users love it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak We a

RE: HELP Can't send mail

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
Neither. I should have read the faq first. My previous posts stated that the SMTP relay had to be the Proxy Server in question. He rebuilt the Exchange Server from scratch but Internet Mail was not functioning. It would seem more advantageous to separate the function of Internet Mail connector

RE: Veratis backup software

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
What user runs the service? This user needs to have appropriate permissions in ExchangeService Account Admin. You can adjust this from Exchange Admin. BEM -Original Message- From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discus

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
vity suite? -Original Message----- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak I am. And, .vbs, .js, .htm, .html, .txt.vbs, etc. My use

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
s.(Example: *.txt.vbs,, *.txt.exe,, *.txt.lnk). ETC. The next version of Antigen will allow content filtering. This helps but can cause other problems so I will use it sparingly. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04,

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
Of course, I don't have to worry about any of this when my ISP dies on me without any notice and I'm unable to contact them for 3 days. -Original Message----- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subjec

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
E: New Virus outbreak Won't filtering *.vbs also filter *.txt.vbs? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
04, 2001 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Won't filtering *.vbs also filter *.txt.vbs? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04,

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak I think the double extension are just meant to throw off humans (with some help from Windows), not filters. -Peter -----Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
n circumvent content filtering solutions by allowing dangerous file types to look as though they are simple, harmless files - such as JPG or WAV files that are normally not filtered. maybe? cheers.byron -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Murphy, Brian
----- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Most of the "free" email services should be filtering or disallowing these types of attachments to be sent. I know that

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-05 Thread Murphy, Brian
That's NAV for you. You need to check out Antigen for Exchange. www.sybari.com -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak The weird thing is that we are blocking .s

New Dilema with Notifications

2001-12-05 Thread Murphy, Brian
Scenario: I have my Antigen software setup to automatically send notifications to a distribution list. For some reason these notifications stopped last week sometime. I do not have Outlook installed on the Exchange Server so I'm assuming it's using the "Messenger" service to send the mail. I'v

RE: blocking message

2001-12-05 Thread Murphy, Brian
Brett- Sorry to hear of your recent trials. Hopefully you will use this as a learning experience and not let it get you down. This is what I would do. I'm not sure if Sybari offers an eval of their Antigen product but I would visit www.sybari.com and try to get a 30 day eval. Install this on y

RE: blocking message

2001-12-05 Thread Murphy, Brian
ngine on all of your servers... Also Better get use to it because this is an everyday thing. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking message Brett- Sorry to he

RE: Invalid Page Fault

2001-12-05 Thread Murphy, Brian
Hmm. This sounds similiar to the "Nimbda" virus. I seem to remember this being one of the affects on the client side. Not positive though. I cannot remember if the client was able to open Outlook and then the system would crash after opening the mail? However, it's probably worth checking int

RE: Off topic...apologies...

2001-12-05 Thread Murphy, Brian
I posted some stuff earlier that touched on this subject. I too was impacted by the AT&T tragedy. However, I am using the @Business service and was told that it was a independant of AT&T @ Home Service. However, I was not aware that they were using Excite as a portal either. Anyway I've ha

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-05 Thread Murphy, Brian
ilter txt.vbs, etc. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak Most of the "free" email ser

Goner Manual Removal FYI

2001-12-05 Thread Murphy, Brian
Just wanted to post this for those of you whom might be having a difficult time downloading the update from your AV vendor. There is a manual removal batch file available from Sophos Antivirus that automates the manual removal of the virus. _

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-05 Thread Murphy, Brian
Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak With antigen or scanmail... is it better to have it on a seperate server or can you have it on your exchange box? Aaron -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:47 AM To: Exchange

OWA 5.5 and SSL

2001-11-13 Thread Murphy, Brian
I have setup a test OWA server on Exchange 5.5 and Windows 2000 OS. I created two sites on the same server because I have two master domains. All mailboxes are located on this one box. After modifying the registry and changing a few files in each directory...everything works great. I installed

RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL

2001-11-13 Thread Murphy, Brian
Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA 5.5 and SSL Sounds like you need to open port 443 to allow SSL to your IIS server hosting your OWA pages. ----- Original Message - From: "Murphy, Brian" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL

2001-11-13 Thread Murphy, Brian
or "import" this cert... Andrew, MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:23 PM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: OWA 5.5 and SSL Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL Yeah. 443 is o

RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL

2001-11-13 Thread Murphy, Brian
E (NT & W2K) + CCNA -Original Message----- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:30 PM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: OWA 5.5 and SSL Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL All users will have IE 5.0 or higher installed. What

RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL

2001-11-13 Thread Murphy, Brian
receive the prompt, go to the tab, and click on "install" or "import" this cert... Andrew, MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:23 PM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conve

RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL

2001-11-13 Thread Murphy, Brian
m win2K servers) will have the options or not for the Cert trust list. You may have to dig around for that info. I gave up on win9x for a long time. Otherwise, you might want to take a look at IEAK stuff. Andrew, MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mail

OWA Site in Metaframe 1.8

2001-11-14 Thread Murphy, Brian
Exc 5.5 SP4 on W2k. Metaframe 1.8 SP2 on TS4 SP6. Running IE 5.0. Cannot get the certificate from the OWA website to stick with the IE client. It asks you to install the certificate everytime you visit the page. Any suggestions?

RE: OWA Site in Metaframe 1.8

2001-11-14 Thread Murphy, Brian
e box? If so... YIKES! Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Site in Metaframe 1.8 Importance: High

RE: New startup Page 4 OWA

2001-11-14 Thread Murphy, Brian
Hmmm. How different is E2k from E5.5 SP4. E5.5 installs OWA as a virtual directory (/exchange). You would need to put a default.htm file in the root directory (look at your IIS MMC). Use the default.htm to create Hyper's to the virtual directory. -Original Message- From: Pomerantz, Dav

RE: OWA Site in Metaframe 1.8

2001-11-14 Thread Murphy, Brian
I have resolved this issue. Sorry to bother everyone. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Site in Metaframe 1.8 Sorry for the lack of info. There are 3 boxes. 1. Exch

RE: OWA Site in Metaframe 1.8

2001-11-14 Thread Murphy, Brian
with the rest of the class? > -Original Message- > From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Site in Metaframe 1.8 > > > I have resolved this issue.

RE: OWA Site in Metaframe 1.8

2001-11-14 Thread Murphy, Brian
with the rest of the class? > -Original Message- > From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Site in Metaframe 1.8 > > > I have resolved this issue.

RE: SSL 40 bit versus 128 bit on Exchange.

2001-11-14 Thread Murphy, Brian
Setup your own root ca. This should cost you nothing. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SSL 40 bit versus 128 bit on Exchange. Exchange 5.5 SP4 One of my tasks

RE: New startup Page 4 OWA

2001-11-14 Thread Murphy, Brian
== Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message----- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: Suggestions would help thanks

2001-11-15 Thread Murphy, Brian
Here's an even better site. www.google.com This provides a much better hit ratio then Microsoft's website. I have about a 50% success rate with their knowledge base returning the appropriate information. Good luck. -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu

RE: VB Runtime Error in OWA

2001-11-15 Thread Murphy, Brian
Where is your global.asa and what is the path of: "bstrVirtRoot =". Open it with notepad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VB Runtime Error in OWA Environment: NT4 Post

RE: VB Runtime Error in OWA

2001-11-15 Thread Murphy, Brian
Also. What is the NTFS permissions on your inetpub and the owa virtual directory? Try setting these to "Everyone" - Full - See what happens? -Original Message----- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions S

Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)

2001-11-16 Thread Murphy, Brian
I've started getting some strange Outbound messages to Postmaster. Please take a look. It appears that these messages are originating from the inside but I am not sure how to track down their source. Any suggestions? --- A mail message was not sent because the maximum time

RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)

2001-11-16 Thread Murphy, Brian
PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster) FAQ -Original Message----- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Outboun

RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)

2001-11-16 Thread Murphy, Brian
riginal Message----- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster) I've started getting some strange Outbound messages to Postmaster. Please take a look. It appears that these mess

RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)

2001-11-16 Thread Murphy, Brian
're being spammed by the looks of things, unless you are intentionally sending out emails with the subject lines you are describing below. You need to turn relaying off or configure it correctly. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -

RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)

2001-11-16 Thread Murphy, Brian
Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster) > > > Ok. I've read

RE: Exchange Mail Storage Management

2001-11-16 Thread Murphy, Brian
Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager (Add-In). Located somewhere on the CD Rom. -Original Message- From: Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Mail Storage Management Please respond if you have experi

RE: Exchange Mail Storage Management

2001-11-16 Thread Murphy, Brian
I believe Veritas has an add on to their Exchange Backup component that will perfom some of these tasks. -Original Message- From: Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Mail Storage Management Please respond

RE: Ban Outlook?

2001-11-16 Thread Murphy, Brian
I prefer Outlook. I use a policy to keep it locked down on the client side. I don't believe that the problem stems from the "creation" of Outlook. The problem is that "some" admins are not pro-active. Others are simply "too busy" or overworked. I think most engineers know what to do they just

RE: Ban Outlook?

2001-11-16 Thread Murphy, Brian
y your HR department is always nice. And while your at itrun some decent A/V on the client side that likes to play with Outlook (www.symantec.com). Am I wrong? -----Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discus

RE: Email Forwarder

2001-11-19 Thread Murphy, Brian
If you allow the relaying make sure you setup authentification and allow only from his/her specified address. -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Forwarder I am not sure how to achie

Dumb Question about Relaying

2001-11-19 Thread Murphy, Brian
I'm ready to get flamed for this one. (Be gentle)Better to learn the hard way then not at all. I have heard everyone talk about not "relaying" mail or not allowing the "relaying" of mail. But what exactly does that mean? For example, I have my system setup to NOT relay mail as per the FAQ.

RE: Dumb Question about Relaying

2001-11-19 Thread Murphy, Brian
ject: Re: Dumb Question about Relaying On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Murphy, Brian wrote: > I have heard everyone talk about not "relaying" mail or not allowing the > "relaying" of mail. But what exactly does that mean? An SMTP system that performs relaying will accept mail f

Verify Sender

2001-11-20 Thread Murphy, Brian
Is there a way to get Exchange to validate sender's address prior to delivery to internal valid user. In other words, is there a way to validate the sender's domain is legit. Example: I have setup a standalone Exchange box that is configured to reroute incoming smtp but has routing restrictions

RE: Multiple Email domains to single user or multiple users on Ex change 5.5

2001-11-20 Thread Murphy, Brian
I believe this is a two step process. You would need to assign the appropriate smtp address to each recipient. Then, you would need to enable routing and setup each domain to be routed internally (Routing tab - Reroute incoming smtp). However, you also need to setup your routing restrictions (R

RE: IIS SMTP relay for Exchange - Is my relay being used by othe rs?

2001-11-20 Thread Murphy, Brian
You are infected with the Nimda virus! -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS SMTP relay for Exchange - Is my relay being used by others? Okay. Here's the low-down. I have an Exchang

RE: IIS SMTP relay for Exchange - Is my relay being used by othe rs?

2001-11-20 Thread Murphy, Brian
Actually...This is one possibility... I don't want to cause panic. Dowload the latest scan engine from www.sophos.com. Make sure you download all the ide files. Perform a virus scan just to make sure. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tu

RE: Verify Sender

2001-11-20 Thread Murphy, Brian
ose RDNS isn't correctly configured, which is a whole bunch of people. Your users will begin to blame you; they don't want to hear about yadda yadda RDNS yadda yadda properly configured blah blah the CEO's home ISP blah blah. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[

RE: IIS SMTP relay for Exchange - Is my relay being used by other s?

2001-11-20 Thread Murphy, Brian
Rule out the virus first. Download some type of AV and scan. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS SMTP relay for Exchange - Is my relay being used by others? Version 4.0 so the