You don't understand the definition of "spam"
so I suggest that you may also STFU.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: SV: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Et
Given our current message volume.
I'm sure we all remember these...
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
--steve
PS: Dude, STFU.
Steve Hanna
Network/Systems Administrator
Niagara Plumbing Supply Company Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is nothing common
Dude, STFU.
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 11:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
>
>
> First, you have no credibility on the point. You find the
> phrase "I fi
Dude, STFU
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 7:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
>
>
> People mis-characterize and read things into my posts that
> are not there.
Dude, STFU.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
>
>
> Yes, we did a phenomenal job for Marathon and Microsoft, without or
> knowl
Dude, STFU
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:02 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
>
>
> Yes, really. Laws are designed to define the floor. Ethics
> are designed
Dude, STFU.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
>
>
> Titles are priceless.
>
> Ethics are about avoiding real an
Dude, STFU.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
>
>
> I will state this again for the 11 millionth and 1 time now. Accepting
> di
Ouch.,
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Password Mainenance
>
>
> No.
>
> We have always manually created the passwords in the past and
> kept a list.
> Do
Samantha,
This list is at sometimes a little rough. If you wish to communicate within
this community there are certain expectations # 1, read the FAQ for this
list (as you should for any list). There are a bunch of very smart folk on
this list that are giving advise for *free*.. If you don't lik
telnet to :80 on the box anymore.
When I try to start the MMC for IIS I get an error cannot connect to mail
"the data is invalid"
Thoughts
--steve
~~~~
Steve Hanna
Network/Systems Administrator
Niagara Plumbing Supply Company Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RightFax has matured somewhat over the years.
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail in to China
Trials and Tribulation?
Admittedly, this was several years ago
You like pie?
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:32 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Message rejected
>
>
> m
> pie...
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Rather than continue to send test messages to the list check your list
prefs.
When was the last time you reviewd your settings.
If infact your settings are cowrrect perhaps an unsub / resub would work.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Slow down.,.. don't get all worried about it.
Read the implications of the klez family of viruses. explain it to your
boss.
your new slow down...
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:23 AM
> To: Exch
This is probably not the best way to manage your mail.
for outlook questions see www.slipstick.com
--steve
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Another Outlook/Exchange question
>
>
> Another note: it seems that when sending my e-mail via a
> networked client (connected to Excha
two great sites
dnsstuff.com
dnsreport.com
the below link is the report for the dot com in question (me thinks)
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=amfes.com
--steve
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP
>
>
> OK, I've verified DNS works.
> I've verified via NSLOOKU
When I subbed this list some 2 years ago. I was promptly told to read the
FAQ. I did, and thus avoided the brutality you speak of.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subj
FAQ 1.11
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Duckman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:04 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Test
>
>
> Test message please ignore
>
>
>
> ___
hope your mouth is big enough for your foot.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Grech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: JDBGMGR.EXE Hoax?
>
>
> the virus really creates a directory from the follo
Is ther something obvious in E2k that causes inetinfo to reach 99% of CPU
all the kbs I can find suggest re-service pack
The box is win2k sp2 + e2k sp2.
I'm trying to answer a question for someone else (I don't have a 2k box yet)
I continue to research..
--steve
_
Yes.
more answers will require more info.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:31 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Email Accounts
>
>
> Hi
>There is a problem where i am at of users can attach
A) You could always just re-create the profile.
B) PST in the mix perhaps
C) 2 hours is a life time :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Offline Folders Un
Troll,
link
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q180/0/94.ASP?LN=EN-US&SD=t
ech&FR=0&qry=LMHOSTS&rnk=4&src=DHCS_MSPSS_tech_SRCH&SPR=W98
>
>
> I am the LMHOST KING bow down to me !! o yeah microsoft.com
> have been slow
> latly when doing searchs
>
> -Original Messa
troll..
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html
~steve
>
> Does anyone know a good program or books for making good
> stationery HTML for
> outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!!
>
> Rich
>
> _
> List posti
pardon, I said pardon. huh what...
ipconfig /? for the full story
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:52 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Off Topic "Display IP from DOS usi
Two halves of coconut banging them together.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K
>
>
> Beat that!
>
> -Original Message-
> From
That being the case the receptionist could manage the servers. I myself am
waiting for the MS easybake oven.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 8:41 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: today's ad
My suggestion, if used, is to be used with the knowledge that "there are
seldom good technological solutions for behavioral problems"
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:42 PM
> To: Exchange Discu
Add a line at the beginning of the MSG stating " do not reply to this MSG as
it was sent from an administrative mail box"
beyond that "delivery restrictions"
--steve
>
> Dear DL Members,
>
> I have been asked to figure out how to send an e-mail
> message out to
> a System Distribut
to continue a thread
please summarize the thought again
or call p s s
I know it sucks but hey WTH
--steve
>
> I'm kind a desperate.
> Can somebody help me get this resolved.
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/
Ha ha ha .
# banner NO! > exchange discussions
Never a dull moment..
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: x400 addressing
>
>
> N N O !!
>
buy a book, come back when your finished reading it.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 6:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: How to set up exchange server
>
>
> Dear All:
>
> We have an Exchange server 5.5 a
Long live this nasty a** list. The attitude of this list is one of it's most
valued properties. As a "new" admin (in the exchange realm) this list has
forced me to be very, very diligent in my study and in the administration on
my company's investment. If this list should become user friendly
34 matches
Mail list logo
