en't told them they *could* have individualized Bayesian
> databases rather than a monolithic domain-wide one.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday,
> > August 25, 2003 9:31 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailin
experience
> has
> been positive with no issues experienced. I have not yet
> used technical
> support. Documentation is complete and useable. It's is doing a very
> good
> job of
> detecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I don't
>
tecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I
> don't believe they offer an outbound solution.
>
> Aaron
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:31 AM
> To: Exchange Discussi
Hello all,
I wonder if those of you that have have experience with the above
services could take a moment and share them, good or bad?
We're currently using Messagelabs (the idea was to help control spam and
add an additional layer of virus protection to our network), and while
the anti-spam and
We have Messagelabs -> NAV for Gateways -> NAV for Exchange -> NAV
Corporate on the desktops.
Seems to work well as we've never had a virus reach one of the desktops.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:39 AM
> T
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:28 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002
>
> Does the recipient have mail delivery set to a PST file?
>
> On 07/25/03 14:39, "Steve Sorenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
Hello,
We are having a strange problem with one user's (we'll call her "User
A") calendar and specifically with meeting requests. Here is the
scenario:
1) User A sends invitation to User B for a meeting.
2) User B accepts invitation.
3) A short while later (the time varies), User A will receive a
Maybe IMAP?
Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> I am in the position of trying to figure out how to get Pine
> to work as a mail client for E2k. Has anyone done this
> before an
owley MCSE+Internet MVP
> >Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> >Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Steve Sorenson
> >Sent: Monda
Can anyone tell me if it's possible to search an Exchange 2000 database
for a particular text string(s)? I need to extract all messages meeting
a certain criteria.
We use Promodag for reporting basic email usage, but this will not
search the message body.
TIA,
Steve
would appear that
> when they say you can use "one of the following methods" they
> mean one and only one. May have to do with how the
> categorizer does it's thing... dunno.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello all,
Exchange 2000 and Outlook 2002.
Trying to allow one individual to create a DL of 1000 users and send
email to these individuals (no, it's really not spam, nor opt-out). In
System Manager | Global Settings | Message Delivery | Defaults |
Recipient Limits is set to "Maximum = 125".
In
Have a look at KB article Q302254.
HTH,
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: E2K Memory Errors
>
>
> If I did not see this with my own two eyes, I would not
> believe it!
You get what you pay for.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
>
>
> Definitely some very inexpensive recreational pharmaceuticals.
>
>
Well, you could create a distribution list with no members. Then add the
SMTP email addresses of those layed off individuals to the list.
HTH,
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 12:24 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> S
All this haiku stuff
It is hard to make sense with
Five seven seven
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:07 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: haiku friday
>
>
> review yesterday
> got a company car now
> plu
t;
>
> Joshua Morgan
> PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
> Fax: (413) 581-4936
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subj
I guess I fail the test then. Why would you post a test message to
public mailing list?
> -Original Message-
> From: Graham Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Test
>
>
> please ignore
NAV Corporate has Anti Virus for Gateways that we're using here with
great success.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: John Shi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:02 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Gateway Virus Protection.
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
> Ha
Half the fun is nailing the live ones to the catapult.
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: fix monitor
>
>
> I prefer frozen squirrels for catapult ammo.
>
>
> -
I agree with Tom. We've been using NAV corporate (NAV for Gateways, NAV
Exchange and NAV on the desktops) for a year and have no, none, nada,
zippo outbreaks. It's performed flawlessy through bombardment of the
many viruses of 2001.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier [mailto:
21 matches
Mail list logo
