Check the disaster recovery whitepapers (someone else has already provided a
link) - I think when you install on the recovery server and you want to use
the same name, you need to use the same Org and site name but create a new
site, not join the existing site.
Been a while and I could be wrong -
newbies
'falling' into Exchange.
Trent Hancock
Austin TX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exch
I would remove the size limit for your blackhole recipients. If a message
NDR's due to size it will be sent back to the sender with the rejection
message AND the complete original message and attachment(s).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bie
The terms 'Microsoft' and 'indexing' remind me of all the weird problems
that disappeared from systems with the removal of Findfast.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-103735@;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Bob Sadler
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 6:22 PM
To:
OMTOOL
Used FaxSr in a VAX/VMS environment (yes, they ported it to NT).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-103735@;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax Sr. on Exchange
Oka
Hydrafax viewer by any chance ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-103735@;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 8:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Vendors AV and attachment exceptions
No argument from me...BUT w
If you and/or your correspondents allow .zip files, you could put it in a
password protected .zip file. I know Symantec's gateway scanner would check
the contents of .zip's, so I assume others do as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-103735@;ls.swynk.
Finally, a voice of reason.
I understood the original question and also thought the 'test it for
yourself' answer a bit short.
I remember desiring the same information once, and after trying Ed's method,
and quickly had a 10mb application log full of useless information before I
could turn it of
Aha !
The Great One is an AGGIE ?
:-)
Trent Hancock
Native Terp, Assimilated Longhorn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Look, Morons
Is this included in their Neatsuite ? Similar to the gateway scanner
included in NAV CE?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allan Johnson
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Sc
SM is Microsoft's feeble attemp
at something like a system catalog (from my old MVS days).
Regards,
Trent Hancock
Available Network/System/Exchange admin
Austin TX, or Southeastern Coastal US
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate
Sent:
See the FAQ
> Good morning,
>
> Outlook 98 exchange 5.5 sp4
>
> My management staff has decided they wanted a low cost way to put
> confidentiality disclaimers on
> the bottom of all eMAILs that are created by our users. They want they to
> go during the send
> process where the user has
Mere mortals would never be able to survive aohell.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 7:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting messages disappearing.. Oh my...
The stars are
Now I've seen
nothing since 2pm today. Yet I can log on via web page and see the stuff I
haven't received. No problem with mail from other lists or other traffic.
Trent Hancock
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.
That, and it just pi$$es most people off just to see it in the message.
IMO (therefore take at what it's worth), your IT security team has stepped
outside it's bounds. A legal dept or exec level demand based on a legal
opinion should be the only source. Even then, I would fight it based on the
That's not an option within Exchange. You need to have an AV or content
filtering pgm running on Exchange that will do this or install a separate
gateway/scanner that your incoming mail goes through before hitting
Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Use the install cd, it should recognize the installed components and give
you the option to remove them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jon
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: uninstall exch services whe
Obviously you haven't yet attempted recovering your server with your
fabulous blbackup
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of kanee
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Or, if you don't want to deal with the NDR's, create a DL with no members
and add the smpt addrs of the departed /terminated employees to it. I call
mine TheBlackHole.
I look at their stuff for a while to see if it can be legitimately
unsubscribed and do so if practical; then add the smtp addr to
The Anti-Longhorn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Busby, Jacob
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folders in System Manager Error
> Are you an Aggie, too? It's not a bad place to be.
This
Won't be able to do it with any version of Outlook (well, don't know about
xp). You need the old Exchange client - can't remember if it's on the 5.5
install cd or if it had O97. Try the version of exchng32 on the users
machine with the problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
