Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Wendy Reetz
In E2K if I hide UserA from the global access list, they can log in through OWA, but not through outlook (xp). Is that typical behavior? or do I have something configured wrong? Is there another way to restrict who's seen in the Address books by Outlook users? I have it set up where the Defau

Global Address Lists

2001-09-11 Thread Rebecca Ford
I am using Exchange 5.5. Currently our global address displays names First Name, Last Name. Is there a way to change the views to be Last Name, First Name without changing the display names in each and every entry? thanks. Rebecca

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
Outlook searches the GAL for a match when it is trying to resolve the user. User must be visible in a GAL. -Original Message- From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 5:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Global Address Lists In E2K if I hide

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Chris Scharff
& www.mail-resources.com | resources | server | directory management > -Original Message- > From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Global Address Lists > > In E2K if I hide Use

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Chris Scharff
Sort of. :) > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Global Address Lists > > Outlook searches the GAL for a match when it is trying to resolve the

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Chris Scharff
x27;t wait to answer this question 47 times at MEC. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Global Address Lists > > The Exchange provisioning whitepaper at www.microsoft.com/isn and

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Baker, Jennifer
talog then they cannot use mapi. -Original Message- From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Global Address Lists In E2K if I hide UserA from the global access list, they can log in through OWA, but not th

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Chris Scharff
Sort of. :) > -Original Message- > From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 5:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Global Address Lists > > Add them to the NewGal group?? I don't see the problem. Are you >

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Baker, Jennifer
The DN thingy didn't work for me. I'm not changing my answer. :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address Lists Sort of. :) > -Original Message-

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Crump, Jay
what's wrong with seeing the default GAL? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address Lists The DN thingy didn't work for me. I'm not cha

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Chris Scharff
s sufficient to restrict the ability to view an object in AD (through other means). > -Original Message- > From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 5:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Global Address Lists > > The DN

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Chris Scharff
6 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Global Address Lists > > what's wrong with seeing the default GAL? > > -Original Message- > From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:12 PM > To: Exchange Discus

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Crump, Jay
o see. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address Lists Depending on the Exchange installation, potentially LOTS, especially in a hosting environment. We used restricted ABV views w

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Baker, Jennifer
I lost you after the beautiful part. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address Lists Well, OK. I think you are correct that if you don't have rights to view the o

Re: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Wendy Reetz
;Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:31 PM Subject: RE: Global Address Lists > I lost you after the beautiful part. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:16

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Chris Scharff
presents a security risk. [1] _Thankfully_ this example is not something I was ever forced to implement for my or any other company, but I know it's been done. -Original Message- From: Crump, Jay To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/16/2002 5:28 PM Subject: RE: Global Address Lists I to

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Baker, Jennifer
al Message- From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Global Address Lists Thank you all for your quick responses. If restricting the view in the GC restricted the object access, wouldn't that mean I shouldn'

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-16 Thread Julian Stone
PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address Lists Restricting address book views will not keep users from using owa, nor will it keep owa users from searching the entire global address list. The restricted address book views in ESM only apply

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-17 Thread Crump, Jay
nly basic e-mail access, and giving them access to the entire GAL represents a security risk. [1] _Thankfully_ this example is not something I was ever forced to implement for my or any other company, but I know it's been done. -Original Message- From: Crump, Jay To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-17 Thread Chris Scharff
Offhand, I don't see any reason why not. -Original Message- From: Crump, Jay To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/17/2002 9:46 AM Subject: RE: Global Address Lists Another question for Chris or anyone else that can help. Default mailbox stores when running Enterprise edition E2K

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-17 Thread Crump, Jay
I did offer 2 different scenarios. You don't see reason why not for. which one. "do not mount store" or delete. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Globa

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-17 Thread Chris Scharff
Yes. -Original Message- From: Crump, Jay To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/17/2002 5:42 PM Subject: RE: Global Address Lists I did offer 2 different scenarios. You don't see reason why not for. which one. "do not mount store" or delete. -Original Message--

Re: Global Address Lists

2002-08-18 Thread prontomail
In our case, we create multiple GALs, one for each company we host. - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:17 PM Subject: RE: Global Address Lis

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-18 Thread Crump, Jay
i got the hint. thanks for the clarification. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address Lists Yes. -Original Message- From: Crump, Jay To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-19 Thread Paul Patti
PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Global Address Lists In our case, we create multiple GALs, one for each company we host. - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, Aug

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-19 Thread Chris Scharff
Elsewhere in this thread are links to resources on the subject. > -Original Message- > From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 8:08 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Global Address Lists > > How did you create mutiple G

Re: Global Address Lists

2002-08-19 Thread Wendy Reetz
gs within ou's, not the ou itself. Again, thanks, everyone. Lots of help. Wendy - Original Message - From: "prontomail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 12:29 PM Subject: Re: Globa

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-19 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
nt: Friday, August 16, 2002 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address Lists Depending on the Exchange installation, potentially LOTS, especially in a hosting environment. We used restricted ABV views when I worked at $vbc for other political reasons. > -Original Message-

RE: Global Address Lists

2002-08-19 Thread Baulch, Stephen
-Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 19 August 2002 11:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address Lists No problem, it was a Saturday and I wasn't feeling overly verbose. :) > -Original Message- > From:

RE: Global Address Lists

2001-09-11 Thread Ed Crowley
Subject: Global Address Lists I am using Exchange 5.5. Currently our global address displays names First Name, Last Name. Is there a way to change the views to be Last Name, First Name without changing the display names in each and every entry? thanks. Rebecca

CDO / ASP, Global Address Lists and Distribution Lists

2001-11-20 Thread Cyrus . Curwood
Title: CDO / ASP, Global Address Lists and Distribution Lists Hello all, This is my first post so sorry if anything is wrong! I have posted this via the on-line form but nothing has come through so I am reposting direct. Hope it doesn't double up. I am a beginner to CDO but need one