Nope that works too.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 14, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL
I believe the problem is not in adding people BUT removing them, even though
they are removed
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 14:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL
Far be it from me to disagree with a Great Old One such as yourself, CJ, but
I beg to differ with you on this one. I just tested this, and adding a test
account to a group
-Original Message-
>From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:06 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL
>
>
>As they exist now, yes. If you add people to the DL, they will not get
>permiss
bject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL
As they exist now, yes. If you add people to the DL, they will not get
permissions. The DL is expanded at the time the permissions are granted. The
permissions are then handed out on a mailbox by mailbox basis.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh C
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Walden H.
Leverich
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folder permissions for DL
I know I should know this, but my brain isn'
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folder permissions for DL
I know I should know this, but my brain isn't working today. If I create a
Distribution Lis
I know I should know this, but my brain isn't working today. If I create a
Distribution List and grant the list permissions to a public folder does
that mean that all the members of that list get that permission (Author in
this case)? This is EX5.5SP4 on W2K.
-Walden
Walden H Leveri
7 matches
Mail list logo
